Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Milchakova, O.V. The modern models for the judicial constitutional control in the former Yugoslavia states

Abstract: The article concerns the models of judicial constitutional control in the states currently existing at the territory of the Former Yugoslavia (Bosnia, Herzegovina, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia, Montenegro). These states have a history of Socialistic past, which is similar to Russia, and their experience is especially interest, since their tradition was continuous for more than half a century. The author provides consecutive analysis of the similarities and differences in the process of formation, competence, procedures of the constitutional courts in the former Yugoslavian states, their places within the systems of state government bodies. The author used mostly historical and formal legal method for the analysis, and also comparative legal method. The results of study allow to state that these states have an European model of judicial constitutional control. Finally, the author draws a conclusion that in all of the Former Yugoslavia states the constitutional courts are regarded as independent state bodies, which are not included into any branches of state power, while they de facto implement judicial power, their proceedings are de facto part of judiciary.


Keywords:

former Yugoslavia states, constitutional control, constitutional court, American model, European model, Constitution, constitutional proceedings, judicial power, constitutionality, actio popularis.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. A. D. Kerimov, E. V. Khalipova Pravomerno li vydelenie lish' trekh vetvei gosudarstvennoi vlasti? // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-3.-C. 42-48.
2. Naumovski B. Constitutional Judiciary in the Republic of Macedonia (Development, Competence, Experience, Challenges and Perspectives). // Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. 3(53)’11. S. 166-167.
3. Nuriev G. Kh. Evropeiskaya model' konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva. M., 2012.-224 s.
4. Nesmeyanova S. E. Konstitutsionnyi sudebnyi protsess v Rossii: Ucheb. posobie. M., 2012.-204 s.
5. Mil'chakova O. V. Konstitutsionnyi kontrol' v stranakh byvshei Yugoslavii. M., 2014.-308 s.
6. Mil'chakova O. V. Konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya v Khorvatii: stanovlenie, razvitie, osnovy organizatsii. Monografiya. M., 2013.-174 s.
7. Mesich S. Kak razvalilas' Yugoslaviya. M., 2013.-394 s.
8. Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po byvshei Yugoslavii: Deyatel'nost', rezul'taty, effektivnost'. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Moskva, 22 – 23 aprelya 2009 g.) / Otv. red. E. Yu. Gus'kova. M., 2012.-544 s.
9. Konstitutsionnyi kontrol' v zarubezhnykh stranakh: ucheb. posobie / otv. red. V. V. Maklakov. – 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M., 2010.-672 s.
10. Konstitutsionnyi kontrol': doktrina i praktika: materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 20-letiyu Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Sankt-Peterburg, 28-29 oktyabrya 2011 g.) / Pod red. V. D. Zor'kina. M., 2012.-464 s.
11. Bondar' N. S. Sudebnyi konstitutsionalizm v Rossii v svete konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. M., 2011.-544 s.
12. Vitruk N. V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess: ucheb. posobie. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2011.-592 s.
13. Storozhev A.N. Modeli konstitutsionnoi yustitsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava.-2013.-9.-C. 1108-1114.
14. Karpenko K.V. Institut posleduyushchego (konkretnogo) konstitutsionnogo kontrolya vo Frantsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2013.-5.-C. 780-790.
15. Mil'chakova O.V.. Predely vmeshatel'stva Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v deyatel'nost' Konstitutsionnogo suda Bosnii i Gertsegoviny // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10872.
16. Mil'chakova O.V.. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie na strazhe prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.12.10446.
17. Mil'chakova O.V.. K voprosu o stadiyakh konstitutsionnogo sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10382.
18. Sokolov T.V.. Vzaimosvyaz' konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstv: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9496.
19. Nafikova G.A.. Pravozashchitnyi aspekt mekhanizma realizatsii printsipa okhrany prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.5001.
20. Prizhennikova A.N.. Problemy formirovaniya sovremennoi modeli administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.12.
21. S.V. Narutto. Konstitutsionnyi sudebnyi protsess: ponyatie, priznaki, osobennosti // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.05.15.
22. Kobzar'-Frolova M.N.. K voprosu o ponyatii i sushchnosti administrativnoi yurisdiktsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.02.7.
23. M.S. Zhamborov. Osobennosti printsipa sostyazatel'nosti v konstitutsionnom sudoproizvodstve po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i SShA // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.01.3.
24. Volkov A.M., Lyutyagina E.A.. Sudebnye sposoby razresheniya administrativnykh sporov v oblasti prirodopol'zovaniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107.
25. A. A. Mikhailova. Konstitutsionnoe razvitie Serbii v XIX – nachale KhKh veka: stanovlenie sovremennogo poryadka v traditsionnom obshchestve // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107.
26. Korzina I.A.. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie-mekhanizm zashchity prav mestnogo samoupravleniya. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107
27. Mil'chakova O.V. K voprosu o stadiyakh konstitutsionnogo sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1694 - 1700. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10382.
28. Mil'chakova O.V. Predely vmeshatel'stva Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v deyatel'nost' Konstitutsionnogo suda Bosnii i Gertsegoviny // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 2. - C. 171 - 180. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10872.
29. Mil'chakova O.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie na strazhe prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1528 - 1536. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.12.10446.
30. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. «Uvlechenie obshchimi mestami» i tsennostnyi komponent konstitutsionalizma // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 296 - 317. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.3.503. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_503.html
31. Markov P.V. Usloviya osushchestvleniya sudebnogo usmotreniya v stranakh kontinental'noi i anglosaksonskoi pravovoi sem'i // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 4. - C. 73 - 107. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_318.html
32. Eremina N.V., Seredenko S.. Konstitutsionnyi natsionalizm v sovremennoi Evrope: novyi uroven' ugroz. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2014. - 3. - C. 1 - 42. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.3.11170. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_11170.html