Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Milovidov, O.D. The non-judicial dispute resolution bodies for the civil officers claims in the USA and the Great Britain.

Abstract: The object of this study is a combination of material and procedural legal norms, which regulate the activities of the non-judicial dispute resolution bodies, which deal with the claims of civil officers in the Great Britain and the USA, as well as the theoretical provisions of the existing studies on civil service. The goal of this article is to uncover the specific features of legal regulation of non-judicial resolution of claims by civil officers in the Great Britain and the USA, as well as to establish the status of such bodies and procedural specific features of non-judicial protection of rights of civil officers. The methodological basis for the studies is comprised by the general scientific (analysis and synthesis, comparison, description, generalization, classification, deduction and induction) and legal (formal legal and comparative legal) methods. The result of the study is establishment of the specific features of the non-judicial protection of civil officers in the states, belonging to the Anglo-Saxon legal family in accordance with the specific features of national legal regulation. The results of this study may be used for the improvement of the normative legal basis and legal mechanisms for the nonjudicial protection of civil officers in the Rusian Federation. The conclusions of the author show the dramatically different but equally efficient approaches to the non-judicial protection of rights of civil officers, dealing with their claims and decision-making on these claims.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, civil, service, the Great Britain, the USA, claims, non-judicial, dealing with the case, bodies, process.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. A dministrative Procedure Act 1946 g. P.L. 79-404, 60 S 237;
2. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Pub. L. 90-202;
3. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Pub. L. 101-336;
4. Civil Rights Act of 1964 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5;
5. Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 The Stationery Of? ce Limited, 2010. P.1, C.1, Sec.2(4);
6. Equal Pay Act of 1963 Pub. L. 88-38;
7. Federal service Reform Act 1978 P.L 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111;
8. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 Pub.L. 110-233, 122 Stat. 881;
9. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Pub. L. 93-112;
10. Whistleblower Protection Act 1989 P.L. 101-12, 103 Stat. 16;
11. http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/k/b/Acas_Code_of_ Practice_1_on_disciplinary_and_grievance_proceduresaccessibleversion-Jul-2012.pdf;
12. http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/about/resources/civilservicemanagement-code;
13. http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/about/values/;
14. Code of Practice Discipline and Grievance Procedures, Blackwell, TSO 2009;
15. http://www.civilserviceappealboard.gov.uk/; 16. 5 USC par. 1214, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ text/5/1214; 17. http://www.mspb.gov/about/jurisdiction.htm; 18. http://www.osc.gov/pppNext1.htm