Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Nikitina, O.P. Judicial examination of a document as a method of control over the claims of falsifi cation of evidence in the arbitration process.

Abstract: The goal of this article is to study the role of judicial examination of a document as one of the means of analysis of claims on falsifi cation of documents. Examination of the document in question by the court is important in order to evaluate the position of the party to the case, who asks for an expertise, as well as the counter-arguments of his opponent, and to form the opinion of the court on its authenticity and the necessity of an expertise. The main goal is to fi nd elements of the document which give grounds for the doubts in its authenticity. The results of such an examination may strengthen or weaken the doubts of a judge in authenticity of a document, and become one of the grounds for supporting or denying the claim for the expertise, it also may be helpful for the establishment of questions for an expert, as well as for the preparation of materials for the expertise, and in general it facilitates correct and timely rulings on the cases.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, viewing, document, claim, expertise, control, court, authenticity, process, evidence.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Aver'yanova, T.V., Belkin, R.S., Korukhov Yu.G., Rossinskaya E.R. Kriminalistika pod red. zasluzhennogo deyatelya
2. nauki RF, prof. Belkina R.S. M.: NORMA-INFRA-M, 1999, s. 308-309.
3. Andreev S.V. Problemy teorii i praktiki kriminalisticheskogo dokumentovedeniya. – Irkutsk: Izdatel'stvo
4. IGEA, 2001g., s.53;
5. Arsen'ev, V.D. Kriteriy istiny pri ustanovlenii fakticheskikh obstoyatel'stv dela v sudebnom i ekspertnom
6. issledovanii // Voprosy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy ekspertizy. Trudy VNIISE. Vyp. 7, M., VNIISE, 1973,
7. s.95; Istina, dostovernost' i obosnovannost' v sudebnom issledovanii po ugolovnym delam // Sb. Voprosy
8. teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy, M., 1966, s.8; Treushnikov M.K., ukaz.soch., s.s. 40-49 i dr.
9. Gortinskiy, A.V. Voprosy kompleksnogo issledovaniya dokumentov, izgotovlennykh v sfere komp'yuternykh
10. tekhnologiy // Sudebnaya ekspertiza na rubezhe tysyacheletiy. Materialy mezhvedomstvennoy nauchno-prakticheskoy
11. konferentsii 21-22 maya 2002g. ch.1 SYuI MVD Rossii, Saratov, 2002.
12. Gorshin, A. S. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza dokumentov. — Volgograd, 1994. S. 36.
13. Zhizhina M.V. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza dokumentov v arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstveyu. Diss. … kand.
14. yurid. nauk., M., 2003,
15. Kriminalistika: rassledovanie prestupleniy v sfere ekonomiki / Pod. red. prof. V. G. Gorbovskogo. S. 258.
16. Postanovlenie Gosstandarta RF ot 24.12.99 ¹707-st. «Pechati s vosproizvedeniem gosudarstvennogo gerba
17. Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (GOST R 51511-99).
18. Polozhenie o perevodnom i prostom veksele, utv. Postanovleniem TsIK i SNK SSSR ot 07.08.1937 ¹104 / 1341
19. // Svod zakonov SSSR, t.5, s.586.
20. Postanovlenie Gosstandarta RF ot 31.07.1997g. ¹273 «O prinyatii i vvedenii v deystvie gosudarstvennogo
21. standarta». Unifitsirovannye sistemy dokumentatsii. Unifitsirovannaya sistema organizatsionno-rasporya-
22. ditel'noy dokumentatsii. Trebovaniya k oformleniyu dokumentov (GOST R 6.30-97).
23. Sovremennye vozmozhnosti sudebnykh ekspertiz (Metodicheskoe posobie dlya ekspertov, sledovateley, sudey).
24. M., «Triada.Kh», 2000, s. 35.
25. Kriminalistika pod red. V.A. Obraztsova, M., 1999g., s.183; Kriminalistika pod red. E.P. Ishchenko, M., «Yurist»,
26. 2000g., s.236;
27. Lisichenko V.K. Sledstvennyy osmotr kak spetsial'nyy metod issledovaniya ob'ektov v protsesse dokazyvaniya
28. po ugolovnym delam // Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza. Respublikanskiy mezhvedomstvennyy sbornik
29. nauchno-metodicheskikh rabot. Vyp. 11, Kiev, 1973; Soderzhanie i funktsii sledstvennogo (sudebnogo) osmotra
30. dokumentov // Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza. Respublikanskiy mezhvedomstvennyy sbornik nauchno-
31. metodicheskikh rabot. Vyp. 11, Kiev, 1975.
32. Nikolaychik, V.M. Sledstvennyy osmotr veshchestvennykh dokazatel'stv, M., 1968;
33. Ozhegov, S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka. M., 1987.
34. Orlov, Yu.K. Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse, M., 2000g., s.5.
35. Podvolotskiy I.N. K voprosu ob ugolovno-pravovom, ugolovno-protsessual'nom i kriminalisticheskom ponyatii
36. dokumentov // Sudebnaya ekspertiza na rubezhe tysyacheletiy. Materialy mezhvedomstvennoy nauchno-prakticheskoy
37. konferentsii 21-22 maya 2002g. ch. II SYuI MVD Rossii, Saratov, 2002, s.170.
38. Informatsionnoe pis'mo VAS RF ot 19.08.94 // Vestnik VAS RF, 1994, ¹11, s. 68-69.
39. Sosenushkina M.N. Osobennosti identifikatsionnogo issledovaniya ottiskov udostoveritel'nykh pechatnykh
40. form (pechatey i shtampov), izgotovlennykh po sovremennym tekhnologiyam // Sudebnaya ekspertiza na rubezhe
41. tysyacheletiy. Materialy mezhvedomstvennoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 21-22 maya 2002g. ch. 1 SYuI
42. MVD Rossii, Saratov, 2002.
43. Shashkin, S.B., Soklakova, N.A., Tyurina, N.V. Nekotorye aspekty kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya tekstov,
44. otpechatannykh na kapel'no-struynykh printerakh // Kriminalistika XXI vek. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy
45. konferentsii 26-28 fevralya 2001g., MVD RF, M., 2001, t.1, s.s.80-84,
46. Yakovlev V.F. Arbitrazhnye sudy: problemy i puti ikh resheniya // «Rossiyskaya yustitsiya», ¹5, 2002, s. 3.
47. Materialy del ¹A73-2121/2011, ¹A73-10197/2011