On qualifi cation of the abuse of procedural rights.


	Law and Politics Reference: Popova, I.Y. On qualifi cation of the abuse of procedural rights. // Law and Politics. 2012. № 5. P. 902-908. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51761 Popova, I.Y. On qualifi cation of the abuse of procedural rights. Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of nature of abuse of procedural rights, based on the analysis of the doctrinal views in the science of civil process. The author states that such actions can only be intended, and states that such actions related to the unfounded claims should be viewed as civil offences (Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). Keywords: jurisprudence, abuse of procedural rights, judicial discretion, implementation of procedural rights, adversary character, civil process, civil law, civil offence, court, abuse. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article References 1. Agarkov M.M. Problema zloupotrebleniya pravom v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Otdelenie 2. ekonomiki i prava. 1946. №6. S.422–436. 3. Vitruk N.V. Pravovoy status lichnosti v SSSR M., 1985. 4. Grel' Ya.V. Zloupotreblenie storon protsessual'nymi pravami v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: Dis…. 5. kand. yurid. nauk. Novosibirsk, 2006. 6. Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 1972. S.47. Podobnyy podkhod predstavlen i v upo- 7. minaemykh ranee uchebnikakh grazhdanskogo prava MGU i SPbU. 8. Gribanov V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav. M., 1972. S.38. 9. Kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. T.A. Zhilina. M.: OOO 10. “TK Velbi”, 2003. S. 277 - 278 (avtor kommentariya k glave 9 - I.A. Prikhod'ko). 11. Kulakov V.V. Obyazatel'stvo i oslozhneniya ego struktury v grazhdanskom prave. M.: Volters Kluver, 2010. 12. Kulakov V.V. Solidarnoe obyazatel'stvo: vse za odnogo? // EZh-Yurist. 2011. №37. 13. Makovskiy A.L. Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Vstup. st. . M.: 14. Statut, 2009. 15. Prikhod'ko A.I. Vosprepyatstvovanie razresheniyu del v arbitrazhnykh sudakh: aktual'nye voprosy sudebnogo pra- 16. voprimeneniya. M.: Volters Kluver, 2006. 17. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. M., 2004. S.392-396. 18. Tyumenev V.Z. Teoriya zloupotrebleniya pravom v pravovykh sistemakh sovremennosti. Rezhim dostupa: htpp//www. 19. tisbi.ru/science/vestnik/issue1/ur2.html 20. Shamshurin L.O dispozitivnosti i zloupotreblenii protsessual'nymi pravami v sostyazatel'nom protsesse v 21. sfere grazhdanskoy yurisdiktsii: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2009. №6, 22. 2010. №1. 23. Shebanova N.A. Zloupotreblenie protsessual'nymi pravami //Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2002. №5 (14). 24. Yudin A.V. Zloupotreblenie protsessual'nymi pravami pri rassmotrenii del v arbitrazhnykh sudakh: problemy 25. teorii i praktiki // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2007. №7; On zhe: Zloupotreblenii protsessual'- 26. nymi pravami. v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. SPb., 2005. 27. Frantsuzskaya respublika: Konstitutsiya i zakonodatel'nye akty. M., 1989. S. 26-29.

Journals

Books

Popova, I.Y. On qualifi cation of the abuse of procedural rights.