Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Foreign tourism in the Nizhny Novgorod region in the late 1920s–1930s.

Ryabova Ol'ga Vyacheslavovna

ORCID: 0000-0001-9017-0983

PhD in History

Associate Professor, Department of Service and Tourism, Institute of Economics and Entrepreneurship, N.I. Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University

603022,Nizhny Novgorod, Gagarin Ave., 23.

orabova034@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Efremova Marina Vladimirovna

ORCID: 0000-0002-6985-2696

Doctor of Economics

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Service and Tourism, Institute of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

603022, Russia, g. Nizhnii Novgorod, prospekt Lenina, 27

efremovamv@iee.unn.ru
Shimin Nikolay Andreevich

ORCID: 0000-0001-7834-790X

PhD in Economics

Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Service and Tourism, Institute of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

603022, Russia, g. Nizhnii Novgorod, prospekt Lenina, 27

shimin@iee.unn.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2023.8.43717

EDN:

WKDYIZ

Received:

04-08-2023


Published:

31-08-2023


Abstract: The subject of the study is the formation and development of foreign tourism in the Nizhny Novgorod (Gorky) region in the first decades of Soviet power. The purpose of the paper is to describe the problems faced by the tourism industry in organizing work to attract foreign tourists. With the beginning of the "Stalinist modernization", the flow of foreign tourists is increasing. But the material and technical base of the tourism industry turned out to be completely unprepared for this. There was also a catastrophic lack of trained personnel to work with intourists. To get out of this situation, the government creates the GAO "Intourist", which becomes a monopolist in the organization and reception of foreign tourists. The methodology of the work is based on the principles of historicism and objectivity, as well as a systematic approach that allows a comprehensive examination of the subject under study. The novelty of the scientific work lies in the identification and generalization of historical sources, the involvement in scientific circulation of archival data showing the activities of the Gorky Regional Department in the period under study. The conducted research has shown that the need to open representative offices of GAO "Intourist" abroad, the organization of work with intourists already on the territory of the USSR faced an acute shortage of highly qualified personnel. The solution to this problem was the organization of courses for the training of tour guides with knowledge of foreign languages. Problems with the accommodation of intourists in hotels, poor transport provision were the result of chronic underfunding of the industry. The explanation for this is the need for industrialization in the USSR. Therefore, the tourism industry was provided on a residual basis.


Keywords:

Nizhny Novgorod, Gorky Regional Branch, intourist, industrialization, industrial excursions, ideological propaganda, hotel, personnel of tourism enterprises, training of tour guides, cultural and historical monuments

This article is automatically translated.

The history of the development of tourist and excursion business in the Gorky region is an integral part of the history of the development of tourism in our country. In the Soviet Union, excursions and tourism were very popular, they performed an important socio-ideological function, while tourist activity was based on the concept of "proletarian tourism", which meant the education of strong and healthy Soviet people who were ready to endure the proposed "Spartan", paramilitary service of tourist enterprises [1, p. 181]. It should be noted that the first experiences of foreign tourism in the USSR were also based on the ideological attitudes of the Communist Party.

Numerous works by Soviet historians, for example, A. E. Ioffe [2], M. S. Kuzmin [3], L. S. Nikolskaya [4], and modern researchers are devoted to the process of formation and development of foreign tourism in the USSR in the pre-war period. Among modern scientists , it is particularly worth highlighting the works of I. B Orlova and E. V. Yurchikova "Mass tourism in Stalin's everyday life" [1], L. G. Berezovskaya "Intourist": at the origins of foreign tourism in the USSR" [5], V. S. Novikova "Business under state control: foreign tourism in the USSR in the 1930s-1980s" [6]. They present in detail the process of development of the tourist movement as a whole, including the activities of VAO "Intourist". The activities of regional tourist and excursion organizations of the pre-war period can be studied only through careful work with the funds of local archives. The materials presented in this article make it possible to involve the data of the State Socio-Political Archive of the Nizhny Novgorod region (hereinafter – GOP NO) into scientific circulation.

Due to a number of objective reasons, the ways of foreign tourism bypassed the USSR until the mid-1920s.  It was only starting from the 1926/27 season that small groups of foreign tourists began to come to the Soviet Union.

 At the same time, tourist trips were limited to visits to the two largest cities of the USSR – Moscow and Leningrad. The All-Russian Society for Cultural Communication with Abroad (VOX) dealt with the reception and service of foreign tourists, as well as excursion programs [7, p. 3]. Foreign tourism in the USSR did not have any economic significance during this period, it was mainly of a cultural and ideological nature.  However, since 1928 there has been a noticeable increase in the number of foreign tourist groups arriving in the USSR, mainly due to visits to the country by cruise ships, which began to include the Leningrad port in their route [8, L. 6].

VOX could no longer cope with servicing the increased tourist flow, and it was decided to transfer its functions to the Sovtorgflot, which created a special passenger office for this purpose [5, p.11]. The passenger office provided foreign tourists with accommodation in hotels, transfers and cultural and excursion services, but it managed to work only for one season.

In the spring of 1929, in accordance with the Government Decree, the State Joint Stock Company "Intourist" was established [9, p.11]. GAO "Intourist" received from the Government of the USSR the monopoly right to receive foreign tourists in the country. The scope of his duties was clearly defined and consisted in the following: "attracting and servicing foreign tourists and tourists to the USSR, selling tickets, transporting foreign tourists ... providing them with accommodation, organizing the sale of souvenirs and art objects, cultural services" [10]. It should be noted that in the first years of its existence, economic motives prevailed in the activities of GAO Intourist. Thus, in a note by a member of the Board of Intourist T.S. Khoziainov "On the problems of the development of foreign tourism in the USSR" dated September 22, 1929, it was emphasized: "Foreign tourism in our conditions can be considered as a special branch of the economy as the simplest and most profitable export. In fact, we sell tours of the USSR abroad for foreign currency… In addition, tourists, while in the USSR, making the tour they bought, buy all kinds of antique, handicraft and other things, for which they also pay in foreign currency ... foreign tourism contributes to the establishment and strengthening of cultural and economic ties" [11, p. 116].

Immediately before the "Intourist" a number of complex tasks arose. Firstly, it was necessary to open a number of its representative offices abroad. But this required trained personnel, which, unfortunately, the USSR did not possess at that time. Therefore, Intourist attracts to its work those citizens of the USSR who, even before the revolution, had the opportunity to travel as a tourist around the world or had been in exile for a long time and, accordingly, knew foreign languages, customs and customs of Europeans. In addition, about 1,600 foreign travel agencies and travel agencies that worked with Intourist on a contractual basis were engaged in attracting foreign tourists to the USSR. Among them were all world leaders, for example, Thomas Cook & Son [5, p. 12].

Secondly, it was necessary to create a network of its branches on the territory of the USSR, equipped with hotel bases, motor transport and personnel of highly qualified guides-translators. If in the first years of Intourist's activity the flow of guests from abroad was quite large and stable, then by 1931 the situation was changing dramatically. This was due to the fact that 95% of tourists left the USSR, remaining dissatisfied with the services provided [5, p. 14].  The foreign press begins to publish articles describing "the misadventures of tourists in the USSR." Among the complaints, the main place was occupied by: poor conditions of transfer, accommodation and food; incompetence of hotel and restaurant employees; unsanitary conditions that reigned everywhere. So, the American writer Theodore Dreiser, who visited the USSR in 1927, described his stay in Nizhny Novgorod (since 1932 – Gorky): "Our hotel "New Russia" turned out to be next to a beautiful square called Sovetskaya. The square adjoins the walls and towers of the Kremlin, and in its center stands a beautiful white church with silver domes. But in the hotel we got two stuffy, stripped rooms. Mine was particularly impressive: soft black armchairs and a sofa gave it the look of a gambling hall" [12]. It should be noted that the most prominent representatives of the Western intelligentsia, to which Theodore Dreiser belonged, were provided with services of the highest class level. While ordinary foreign tourists were forced to use a completely different level of service. Thus, in the reporting materials of Intourist, it was regularly noted that "... foreigners spent the night in bathrooms, in corridors, or were forced to spend the night at train stations", "in most cases, the premises are dirty, with stale linen ... there are no baths, the restrooms are so polluted that it is impossible to use them" [11, p.118].

In order to resolve the issue with the accommodation of foreign tourists, according to the resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR No. 763 of September 5, 1931 "On the development of foreign tourism in the USSR", Intourist was allowed to build, repair and rent hotels, dormitories and other premises suitable for a foreigner. By the beginning of 1933, the best hotels in the country belonged to Intourist. Intourist had four hotels in Moscow, three in Leningrad, two in Kiev, Kharkiv and Odessa. Hotels were also located in cities such as Tiflis, Dnepropetrovsk, Rostov-on-Don, Batumi, Novorossiysk, Yalta, Sevastopol, Erivan, Baku, Vladivostok and others [8, l. 6].

Three hotels were built in Gorky in the 1930s: Volna on Lenin Avenue, Intourist on Theater Square and the Rossiya Hotel on Verkhnevolzhskaya Embankment. Intourist conducted the construction of hotels together with the City Council, which allowed, albeit belatedly, to put the facilities into operation. New hotels were telephoned, most of the rooms had individual baths with hot and cold water. Restaurants, hairdressers, billiard rooms, etc. were also opened at hotels [13, p. 138].

Taking into account the growing importance of Gorky as an industrial center of the Soviet Union, attracting the attention of foreign tourists from all over the world, the USSR Government since the early 1930s has been turning Gorky from a transit point into a permanent tourism point, where every tourist had to have a stop for at least one day.

Due to the expansion of Intourist's foreign relations and the increase in tourist flow, the functional responsibilities of the Gorky Regional Branch have significantly expanded and become more complicated. The activities of Intourist and its branches, as organizations serving foreign tourists, in addition to attracting foreign currency, began to have great political significance, since intourists largely influenced public opinion about the Soviet Union in their countries.

The most difficult moments in the work of the Gorky Regional Department were the selection of highly qualified restaurant and hotel workers with knowledge of foreign languages and the organization of transport for intourists, that is, the creation of the necessary conditions on the Volga Fleet steamships and railway transport.

The situation was particularly acute with the Volga Fleet. On steamships, "unsanitary conditions, insufficiently clear and attentive service of intourists and other trifles were often observed, which, in general, created an unfavorable opinion of intourists" [8, L. 4].

As an example, we can cite a report on the August 1933 excursion-rest for drummers-inventors, foreign workers and specialists. The tour took place in August 1933 on the route Gorky – Astrakhan and back (21 days). It was decided that the trip would take place on the steamer Kashgar. The Volga River Transport Department (VURT) and the Foreign Bureau of the All-Union Council of Trade Unions (Inobyuro) concluded an agreement according to which the VURT was to provide the Kashgar steamer in good condition at the disposal of the Inobyuro. On July 24, 1933, the Kashgar steamer was inspected by the Foreign Bureau Commission. A number of shortcomings were identified: "the steamer is dirty, its appearance does not correspond to its purpose, the paint on the lower deck has fallen off, the upper awning leaks into the cabins. The same can be observed inside cabins, especially cabins of the 3rd category" [14, l. 39]. The Foreign Bureau Commission concludes that the Kashgar steamer is "absolutely unsuitable for excursions by foreign specialists and considers it necessary to renegotiate the contract for some other steamer" [14, l. 40]. But the excursion took place on this particular vessel, since the rental price of the Kashgar steamer was significantly lower than the price of another steamer more suitable for this purpose, namely, only 60 thousand rubles. There were positive moments during the tour. So, during the trip, unauthorized passengers were not allowed on board the steamer. And most importantly, the transportation of raw leather and other fetid cargo on the deck of the steamer was not allowed [14, L. 34].

Thirdly, the most difficult problem for Intourist was the training of highly qualified guides and interpreters. In the Charter of Intourist, approved by the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR on February 7, 1933, it was written that the Society should independently "train the necessary personnel to serve intourists in universities, technical schools and factory schools and organize appropriate educational institutions, research institutes, courses, lectures, etc." [5, p.15]. Since tourists speaking different languages began to visit the Soviet Union, it was necessary to create a staff of translators who would know English, French, German, Spanish, Italian and other European languages. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that for guides-translators, it was not enough to speak only a foreign language in order to satisfy the interest of a foreign tourist in various aspects of the life of the Soviet Union. Therefore, since 1930, 3-year courses have been created at higher educational institutions in Moscow, Leningrad and Kiev, where training was conducted according to programs developed by the excursion and translation department of the Moscow Institute of New Languages (EPO MIN) [15, p. 8]. For several years, more than 10 thousand representatives of the tourist asset from all regions of the country have completed these courses. The Tourist and Excursion Technical School, which began its work in November 1932 in Moscow, also provides significant assistance in the training of personnel [16, p. 24].

In Nizhny Novgorod (since 1932 Gorky), the training of translators was carried out on the basis of the "Provincial Higher Courses of Foreign Languages and Literatures at GUBONO", since the city in the 1920s-30s became one of the largest industrial centers of the country. The industrial development of Gorky caused a large influx of foreign specialists. Therefore, according to the decision of the authorities, the "Provincial Higher Courses of foreign Languages and Literatures at GUBONO" were not only to teach students foreign languages, but also to conduct political activities among foreign workers and specialists who arrived in the city for the construction of gas, the launch of new industrial enterprises and the re-equipment of old factories.  On September 13, 1937, the Resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR No. 953 "On the training of teachers of foreign languages for lower secondary and secondary schools" was issued and a decision was made to organize on the basis of the "Provincial Higher courses of foreign Languages and Literatures at GUBONO"  Gorky Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages (GPII) with a three-year term of study [17].

Familiarization with the industry of the Gorky Region, as a rule, was the main goal of foreign tourists, but the administration of enterprises did not always meet halfway and often refused intourists to inspect a particular plant [18, p. 47]. In addition, Gorky attracted foreign tourists with ancient monuments; in this respect, too, not everything was going well, since many monuments, for example, the Kremlin, the Nativity Church and others, were in an extremely neglected state.

In February 1919, the gubpodotdel for Museums and the protection of monuments of culture and art (gubmuseum) was established in Nizhny Novgorod. It was the first Soviet institution in Nizhny Novgorod province in charge of monument protection [19, pp. 18-19]. But the protection of ancient monuments by the Gubmuseum was conducted exclusively in the form of a census, which was due to the extremely small staff and almost complete lack of funding. In addition, since the late 1920s, museum activity in the USSR was abruptly curtailed, and local history organizations were even subjected to destruction [20, p. 6]. The ideological campaign against religion that has begun has led to the destruction of a huge number of church buildings, including those that until recently were considered historical monuments. Restoration work was not carried out during this period, at best it was limited to maintenance repairs. The popularization of cultural and historical heritage during this period was almost completely absent. Although it should be noted that A.P. Melnikov's brochure "Nizhny Novgorod antiquity: a guide to help tourists" (1923). As a result, the period of 1917-1941 is marked by huge losses in the historical and cultural heritage of the Nizhny Novgorod (Gorky) region.

Thus, summing up, we can note the following. The activity of receiving foreign tourists in the Nizhny Novgorod (Gorky) region in the first decades of Soviet power was characterized by the following features. Firstly, the decision of the Soviet authorities to turn Nizhny Novgorod (Gorky) into an industrial center contributed to the influx of foreign tourists. But the material and technical base of the city turned out to be completely unprepared for this. There were simply not enough hotels. The organization of the transfer for intourists was also carried out at a very low level. There were objective reasons for this. The country, which survived the civil war and foreign intervention less than ten years ago, was unable to provide a world-class service for foreign guests. The Soviet government tried to correct the situation as much as possible. Certain funds were allocated for the construction of new and repair of old hotels. Work was carried out to improve the transport provision of the industry. But, unfortunately, this was not enough, since the country faced more pressing problems, the financing of the tourism industry was conducted on a residual basis.

Secondly, the tourism industry in the 1920s faced an acute shortage of trained personnel. To work with intourists, ideologically properly trained specialists with good knowledge of foreign languages were needed. To solve this problem, the Government organizes the training of tour guides at courses at higher educational institutions throughout the country. Gorky was no exception and has been in it since 1937 at the "Provincial Higher Courses of Foreign Languages and Literatures at GUBONO"  Gorky Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages (GPII)  3-year courses begin to operate.

Thirdly, Nizhny Novgorod, which has a huge number of cultural and historical monuments, faced the destruction of a significant part of its heritage in the late 1920s. This led to a decrease in the attractiveness of the city in the eyes of foreign tourists who were willing to visit our city, even despite the low level of service, just to see the unique monuments of antiquity. Another attraction for foreign tourists was the industrial enterprises of the city under construction. But even here, when organizing excursions, travel agencies faced already known problems – a shortage of tour guides and a low level of transfer. In addition, not every enterprise of the city tour group could get permission to conduct an excursion.

References
1. Orlov, I. B., & Yurchikova, E. V. (2010). Mass tourism in Stalin's everyday life. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
2. Ioffe, A. E. (1969). International, scientific and cultural relations of the Soviet Union in 1928-1932. Moscow: Science.
3. Kuzmin, M. S. (1971). Activities of the Party and the Soviet State for the Development of International Scientific and Cultural Relations of the USSR: 1917–1932. Moscow: Science.
4. Nikolskaya, L.S. (1970). International relations of the USSR in the first decade of Soviet power. On the history of VOKS and foreign societies of cultural relations with the USSR. Doct. Diss. Absract. Moscow.
5. Berezovskaya, L. G. (2016). "Intourist": at the origins of foreign tourism in the USSR. Modern problems of service and tourism, 10 (4), 10–19.
6. Novikov, V. S. (2016). Business under the control of the state: foreign tourism in the USSR in the 1930s–1980s. Modern problems of service and tourism, 10(4), 20–30.
7. Gridnev, Y. A. (2006). Society of Cultural Communication with Foreign Countries: 1925–1929. Doct. Diss. Absract. Moscow.
8. GOPA NO, f. 5423 G, op.1, d. 1156.
9. Intourist-80 years around the world. (2009). Moscow: Intourist.
10. Official website of JSC "Intourist". Retrieved from http://www.intourist.ru/news.spx?news=h1
11. Stukal, D. K. (2007). Foreign tourism as an instrument of foreign policy of the USSR in the 1930s. Journal MGUS, 2(2).
12. Po Rossii . Dreiser. Russian diary (wikireading.ru). Retrieved from https://pub.wikireading.ru/h3nKFw1opb
13. Korneeva, E. I. (2010). Organization of foreign tourism in the USSR in the 1920s–1930s. Russian history, 3, 134–141.
14. GOPO NO, f.4523 G, op.1, d.790.
15. Orlov, I. B., (2013). "Fighters of the ideological front": training of guides-translators in the USSR. In I. V. Glushchenko, V. A. Kurenny (Eds.), Time, forward! Cultural policy in the USSR (81-95). Moscow: House of the Higher School of Economics.
16. Dvornichenko, V. V. (1985). Tourism in the USSR and the activities of Soviet trade unions on its development (1917–1984). Moscow.
17. History of the university-Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N. A. Dobrolyubov. Retrieved from https://lunn.ru/about/history?ysclid=l6nga2qq9v549857595
18. Ryabova, O. V., & Smirnova, I. P. (2022). From the history of the development of tourist and excursion business in Nizhny Novgorod in the 1920s. Genesis: historical research. 4. doi:10.25136/2409-868X.2022.4.37850 Retrieved from https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=37850
19. Galai, Y. G. (1989). Keep history, traces. Protection of historical and cultural monuments in the Nizhny Novgorod land. 1917–1941. Gorky: Volga-Vyatka Book Publishing House.
20. Lisitsyna, A. V. (2014). Problems of protection of historical and cultural monuments in the cities of the Nizhny Novgorod (Gorky) region: the Soviet period. Academia. Architecture and construction, 3.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study is the development of foreign tourism in the Nizhny Novgorod region in the late 1920s – 1930s. The source base of the study was made up of data from the State Socio-Political Archive of the Nizhny Novgorod region, as well as scientific works by both Soviet historians and modern researchers in the field of tourism development in the first third of the twentieth century. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, objectivity and impartiality in data analytics. The retrospective method is combined here with the historical-genetic one. All this made it possible in this article to reveal the peculiarities of the development of foreign tourism in the Nizhny Novgorod region during the period under review in the context of all-Russian trends. A characteristic feature of this period of tourist development in the Soviet Union was the implementation of the concept of "proletarian tourism", which meant the upbringing of strong and healthy Soviet people who were ready to endure Spartan travel conditions, who did not impose requirements on the quality of tourist service and at the same time were able to actively help in solving urgent tasks of socialist construction. The relevance of this work is beyond doubt, since the development of foreign tourism in Russia during the period under review outside Moscow and St. Petersburg still remains a little-studied problem that has not received sufficient coverage in the scientific literature. The novelty of the presented research consists in the introduction into scientific circulation of a significant array of authentic and poorly studied sources stored in the State Socio-Political Archive of the Nizhny Novgorod region. This made it possible to identify and document the difficulties of the development of foreign tourism: personnel, infrastructure, transport, which, in the context of the ideologization of domestic tourism, were perceived by Soviet people as the norm, but needed to be overcome based on foreign tourists. The article very clearly presents two fundamentally different approaches to the level of organization of domestic and inbound tourism in the first decades of the Soviet state. The article has a logical structure that allows you to consistently highlight its content. The presentation of the research results is carried out from the general to the particular – from the general problems of the development of foreign tourism in the Soviet Union to the specific problems and peculiarities of its development in the Nizhny Novgorod region. As a result of the study, the following characteristic features of the development of foreign tourism in the Nizhny Novgorod region in the first decades of Soviet power were revealed: the transformation of Nizhny Novgorod (Gorky) into an industrial center contributed to the influx of foreign tourists. But the material and technical base of the city was not ready for this, which had objective reasons related to the consequences of the civil war and foreign intervention, as well as the residual principle of financing the tourism industry in the country; the shortage of specially trained personnel for foreign tourism, ideologically mature and well-versed in a foreign language; the loss of a significant part of historical and cultural attractions reduced the attractiveness of the city in the eyes of foreign tourists who were ready to visit Nizhny Novgorod, even despite the low level of service, just to see the unique monuments of antiquity; the organizers of excursions to industrial enterprises under construction in the city faced already known problems – a shortage of tour guides and a low level of transfer. In addition, not every enterprise in the city could get a tour group permission to conduct an excursion. The list of literature involved in the study includes 20 sources, including archival materials and publications on the research topic from different years of publication. Recognizing the undoubted advantages of this interesting work, it is necessary to make a comment related to the name and status of the administrative-territorial unit in question – the Nizhny Novgorod region. For most of the period under study, it was the Nizhny Novgorod province, and only in 1929. It was transformed into the Nizhny Novgorod region, then into the Nizhny Novgorod Region, Nizhny Novgorod District, and in 1936 into the Gorky region. This should have been specified at the beginning of the work, devoting a separate paragraph with links to documentary sources, which would have given the study greater historical authenticity. In the title of the article, perhaps, a clarification could also be made regarding the territorial object of the study. The article is sure to arouse the interest of readers.