Library
|
Your profile |
Historical informatics
Reference:
Latonov V.V., Latonova A.V.
Application of the Theory of Self-organized Criticality to the Analysis of the Liberal Agenda in the Press of 1815-1825.
// Historical informatics.
2022. ¹ 3.
P. 156-165.
DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2022.3.38752 EDN: DSJVGG URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=38752
Application of the Theory of Self-organized Criticality to the Analysis of the Liberal Agenda in the Press of 1815-1825.
DOI: 10.7256/2585-7797.2022.3.38752EDN: DSJVGGReceived: 12-09-2022Published: 11-10-2022Abstract: The subject of the research in this paper is the liberal agenda in the Russian press of the pre-Decabrist period. The object of the study is the newspapers published during this period. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that the proposed study searches for pink noise in the data that were obtained from the press of the first quarter of the XIX century. The paper shows that the public consciousness of this period was in a state of self-organized criticality. Previously, the state of self-organized criticality could be found only in systems that arose at the end of the XIX century or later. The difficulty of the problem considered in this paper is that there are almost no mass sources for such an early historical period, and very few of the available ones lend themselves to formalization. The novelty of the conducted research lies in the application of the scientific tool of the theory of self-organized criticality to data having origins in the first quarter of the XIX century. The main conclusion made by the authors of the article is that the public consciousness in the pre-Decabrist period was in a state of self-organized criticality. For the analysis, statistics of publications in newspapers and magazines were collected, which served as a reflection of the liberal agenda relevant to the period of the genesis of the Decembrists. The paper shows that the sequence of publications on liberal information issues in the Russian press in the period 1815-1825 contains pink noise. Fourier analysis was used to determine it in the dynamic series. Keywords: liberal agenda, liberalism, press, media, newspapers, the era of Alexander I, Fourier analysis, self-organized criticality, statistics, pink noiseThis article is automatically translated. The conducted research shows that the public consciousness was in a state of self-organized criticality. According to newspaper publications, it can be concluded that the enlightened society was in an unstable state and multiple liberal notes in newspapers only warmed up the public. As already mentioned earlier, it would be wrong to consider exclusively liberal notes in newspapers as the motivating impulse of the Decembrist movement. However, the result obtained in this work can be considered as an additional argument in favor of the fact that in an enlightened society there was a certain predisposition to the events of December 1825.
The lists of newspaper and magazine extracts are available for download at the link: https://github.com/WLatonov/Self-organized_criticality_database References
1. Kozodavlev O.P. Discourse on the gradual liberation of the peasants from slavery and on the ways in which civil freedom can be safely introduced between them // Noble projects for solving the peasant question in Russia at the end of the 18th-first quarter of the 19th century. Sat. doc. / Prep. mat. and input. Art. A.N. Long. Lipetsk.-2003.-S. 156.
2. Turgenev N.I. Russia and Russians. M.-2001.-S. 49. 3. The uprising of the Decembrists. T. XX. M.-2001.-S. 168. 4. The uprising of the Decembrists. T. I. M.-L.-1925.-S. 480. 5. Nechkina M.V. Decembrist movement. Moscow: Acad. Sciences, 1955. T. II. – S. 36. 6. The uprising of the Decembrists. T. XIV. M.-1976.-S. 309. 7. Nechkina M.V. Decembrist movement. Moscow: Acad. Sciences, 1955. T. I.-S. 271. 8. Bak P., Tang C., Wiesenfeld K. Self-organized Criticality // Physical Review A.-1988. – Vol. 38. No. 1.-R. 364-374. 9. Malinetskii G.G., Podlazov A.V. The paradigm of self-organized criticality. Hierarchy of models and limits of predictability // Izvestiya VUZov. Applied nonlinear dynamics. 1997. V.5, No. 5. S.89 106. 10. Malinetsky G.G., Kurdyumov S.P. Nonlinear Dynamics and Forecast Problems // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2001. T71, No. 3, p. 210 232. 11. A. V. Podlazov, “New aspects of self-organized criticality”, Preprints of the IPM im. M. V. Keldysh, 1995, 086. 12. A. V. Podlazov and A. R. Osokin, “Self-organized criticality of eruptive processes in solar plasma”, Matem. modeling, 14:2 (2002), 118–126. 13. Pinto C.M.A., Mendes Lopes A., Machado J.A.T. A review of power laws in real life phenomena // Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 2012. Vol.17. Issue 9. P. 3558-3578. 14. Mathews M.K., White M.C., Long R.G. Why Study the Complexity Sciences in the Social Sciences? // Human relations. 1999 Vol. 52. Issue 4. P. 439-462. 15. Andergassen R., Nardini F., Ricotilli M. Innovation Waves, Self-organized Criticality and Technological Convergence // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2006 Vol. 61. Issue 4. P. 710-728. 16. Frigg R. Self-organized criticality – what it is and what it isn’t // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2003. Vol. 34. Issue 3. P. 613-632. 17. Clauset A., Shalizi C., Newman M. Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data // SIAM Rev. 2009 Vol. 51. Issue 4. P. 661-703. 18. Kurdyumov S.P., Malinetskii G.G., Podlazov A.V. Historical dynamics. A view from the standpoint of synergetics // Preprints of IPM im. M.V. Keldysh RAS. 2004. No. 85. S. 1-16. 19. Borodkin L.I. Methodology for the analysis of unstable states in political and historical processes // International processes. 2005. V.3. No. 7. pp. 4-16. 20. Shimada I., Koyama T. A theory for complex system’s social change: an application of a general ‘criticality’ model // Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. 2015. Vol. 13. Issue 3. P. 342-353. 21. Roberts D.C., Turcotte D.L. Fractality and Self-Organized Criticality of Wars // Fractals. 1998 Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 351-358. 22. Thietart R.-A. Strategy dynamics: Agency, path dependency, and self-organized emergence // Strategic Management Journal. 2016. Vol. 37. Issue 4. P. 774-792. 23. Buck P. How nature works: the theory of self-organized criticality. – M.: URSS.-2014.-276 p. 24. Zhukov D.S., Lyamin S.K. Study of social processes by means of the theory of self-organized criticality // Socio-economic phenomena and processes.-2015.-T. 10, No. 4.-S. 194-203. 25. Zhukov D.S., Lyamin S.K. Revolutions on the Net: Application of the Theory of Self-Organized Criticism to the Study of Protest Movements // Historical Informatics.-2017.-No. 4.-P. 11-43. 26. Zhukov D.S. Self-Organized Critical Models in Socio-Humanitarian Research // Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. Story. Philosophy. Right.-2018.-No. 1.-P. 45-60. 27. Zhukov D.S., Lyamin S.K. Approaches and tools of the theory of self-organized criticality in sociopolitical research // PRO NUNC. Modern political processes. No. 1(13): Again about the elites. Tambov.-2014.-S. 84-109. 28. Mandelbrot B.B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.-1982.-470 p
Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|