Ryabova Y.V. —
The Economics of Forced Labor in the Soviet Union: a Historiographical Overview
// History magazine - researches. – 2025. – № 1.
– P. 136 - 146.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2025.1.73134
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/hsmag/article_73134.html
Read the article
Abstract: The subject of the research is the Russian historiography of the post-Soviet period, which examines the genesis of the Soviet punitive system and the mechanism of functioning of such a state structure as the Main Directorate of Correctional Labor Camps (GULAG). The article contains an overview of the scientific literature devoted to the production issues of the GULAG's economic activities and the work of the special agent. The object of the study was the economics of forced labor as an important component of this state unit, an integral part of the Soviet economic system of the 30-50s of the XX century. The purpose of the work is to trace the dynamics in the study of this issue by Russian researchers, identify the main problem-thematic blocks, identify discussion topics and questions, and present the opinions of leading experts. The article pays special attention to the works of modern authors, their positions and opinions. The author used traditional methods for historical science as the main research methods: historical-genetic, comparative-historical, problematic-chronological, descriptive. Their application made it possible to analyze the studied processes and phenomena in the most complete way. The main contribution of the author to the study of this topic can be considered the systematization of the available material presented in the scientific and historical literature of the late 80-90s of the XX century - 10-20 years of the XXI century, reflecting the role of the GULAG in the development of the Soviet national economy.
Based on the results of the work, the author concludes that despite the existence of many research papers examining the problem of forced labor economics in the Soviet Union, there is currently no consensus among researchers in assessing this historical phenomenon, its essence, effectiveness and expediency. Many issues are still debatable and further involvement of additional sources and materials, mainly of a regional nature, will contribute to their solution. The topic has prospects for further study.
Ryabova Y.V. —
Economic aspects of the effectiveness of forced labor in the Soviet camp system in the first half of the 1950s. (based on the Southern Kuzbass Corrective Labor Camp of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR materials).
// Genesis: Historical research. – 2024. – № 1.
– P. 52 - 64.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2024.1.69573
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_69573.html
Read the article
Abstract: Using the example of the Corrective Labor Camp of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, some economic aspects of the effectiveness of forced labor in the Soviet camp system in the first half of the 50s are considered. The twentieth century particular attention is paid to the issue of expenses and income of the forced labor camp. Based on archival materials from the current archive of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Kemerovo Region, a list of expenses is given, as well as the amount of money spent by the state on the maintenance of the prison population and the forced labor camp as a whole. Data on the costs required to maintain the camp economy are correlated with the amount of money for which the contingent produced marketable products annually. Information is provided on the amount of financial assistance received by the forced labor camp from the state budget and from the departmental unit under the jurisdiction of which it was located. The novelty of the research lies in the appeal to unpublished archival documents of the current archive of the Main Directorate of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Kemerovo region and in local history topics that have not received widespread scientific coverage. The author comes to the conclusion that the income received from the labor activities of the prison population not only did not compensate for the costs of servicing the activities of the correctional labor camp, but also significantly exceeded them. Analysis of documentary material clearly showed that the use of forced labor was not cheap for the state, much less free. The state spent significant sums to organize camp production and maintain the prison population. The camp existed thanks to annually received government grants and subsidies.