Abstract: The article provides an overview and analysis of modern English vocabulary on the topic of artificial intelligence, and also examines the factor of “humanity” using examples of the use of phraseological units with the truth component.
The subject of the study is the communicative-pragmatic functions of linguistic units to describe “humanity” both the incorrect result of a program based on artificial intelligence, and the intentional distortion of truth using examples of phraseological units with the truth component.
The selection of empirical material is based on English publications on the topic of artificial intelligence and modern dictionaries (Dictionary.com, Oxford English Dictionary, Cambridge Dictionary of English, Farlex Dictionary of idioms, Collins English Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English). The initial sampling was carried out using a continuous sampling method and amounts to 44 units, further analysis of which showed that 15 phraseological units are used to indicate the truth, 8 indicate deception and 6 - the possible honesty of the speaker.
The main method of studying is an inductive approach.
The purpose of the work is to consider the linguistic units in the presented examples. The relevance of the study is due to the increased public interest in the topic of artificial intelligence, as well as the choice of the word hallucinate as the Word of 2023. The object of the study is the phraseology of the English language. The analysis presents examples of the use of phraseological units with the truth component, the meaning of which conveys the spectrum of interpretation of the truth.
The scientific novelty of the study lies in the quality of the material (modern phraseology and vocabulary of the English language), as well as the analysis and comparison of the meanings of the presented phraseological units.

Abstract: The article examines phraseological units of modern English from the perspective of expressing the meaning of dreaming, fantasizing and making things up. Examples of the use of phraseological units from modern English dictionaries served as empirical material. The relevance of the study is due to the emergence of a secondary nominative meaning for the word hallucinate for the purpose of further analysis of phraseological units and their possible similarity in meaning. The object of study in the article is phraseological units used in the examples presented in dictionaries to correlate the original meaning of the verb hallucinate with the presented phraseological units. The subject of the study is the communicative and pragmatic functions of the received phraseological units to describe dreams, fantasies and inventions in a state of conscious and unconscious. The purpose of the work is to study and analyze the received phraseological units. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the quality of the material (modern phraseology and vocabulary of the English language), as well as the analysis of the relationship between the meaning of the word hallucinate and the presented phraseological units. The main research method is an inductive approach to the analysis of empirical material, in which conclusions are based on the analysis of specific phraseological units. To identify derivational transformations in the structural-semantic organization of phraseological units, the work uses structural-semantic analysis. The result of the analysis reveals a number of phraseological units, the meaning of which does not correspond to the original meaning of the word hallucinate. However, one phraseological unit has been identified which can be considered as a synonym for the word hallucinate. This study contributes to the development of the study of phraseology of English, its enrichment, as well as its understanding in a broad approach.

Abstract: The article examines a number of modern phraseological units (phraseological units, derivatives of phraseological units and author's formations) on the example of the headlines of the English-language press. All the presented empirical material is analyzed according to the context of the publications, as well as the time frame (January 2022 – May 2022).
The relevance of the research is due to the emergence of secondary nominative means of modern English as a communicative necessity. The object of research in the article is phraseological units of the language used in the headings of articles devoted to the study of the phenomenon by Anna Sorokin. The subject of the study is the communicative and pragmatic functions of phraseological units in the media used to describe and characterize the main character and her act. The purpose of the work is to study and analyze the received phraseological units for the possible identification of a new phraseological unit describing the distinctive features of both Anna Sorokin and her history. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the quality of the material (modern English-language press), as well as attempts to establish a phraseological unit directly pointing to Anna Sorokin and her fraudulent actions. The main method of research is an inductive approach to the analysis of empirical material, in which conclusions are based on the study of specific phraseological units. To identify derivational transformations in the structural and semantic organization of phraseological units, the work uses structural and semantic analysis.
The result of the analysis reveals the constant use of one proper name and two author formations, which can later be attributed to the phraseological fund of the English language. This research contributes to the development of principles and approaches to the study of phraseology of the English language, its enrichment, as well as the understanding of phraseology in a broad way.