Abstract: The relevance of the study is explained by the significant growth of scientific publications, as well as the publication of legal acts containing the category of legal regime. Their analysis shows that there is a split in the legal world and a certain vagueness in understanding the content of the term legal regime.
Due to the fact that the category stated in the title of the article becomes the basic unit of the legal apparatus, the subject of the work is the search and development of a unified methodological approach to its content. The accumulated volume of available research on this issue is huge and requires the scientific community to come to a common understanding of this legal phenomenon.
The author suggests for discussion several essential characteristics and elements that allow distinguishing the legal regime as a special type of legal regulation from the usual, current one. Particular attention is paid to the formulation of the concept of legal regime, which allows to distinguish it from other types of legal regulation. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that only a complete detailing of all the elements and properties of the legal regime is able to give it terminological unity, scientific stability and practical clarity for scientists and addressees of the legal regime, to ensure the unconditional implementation of its prescriptions.
The following conclusions are formulated in the paper. The unjustified use of the indisputable authority of the category of legal regime by virtue of its unconditional recognition by the scientific community, blind worship in front of it is nothing but a legal fetish or a legal chimera.
The legal regime in the narrow sense is a limited in scope and time, an exception from the general order of legal regulation, due to the need to implement legal measures and means provided by the state, with the predominant use of certain methods, to eliminate the actual circumstances hindering its current implementation (or the creation of favorable conditions), in order to ensure the occurrence of the desired law and order.

Abstract: This research is dedicated to legal regulation of the sphere of private interests preserved in the conditions of legal regime of the martial law. Comparative analysis demonstrates the need for protecting the private sphere of public relations in terms of the market economy, and primarily private property. Shifting the restrictive measures that existed in Soviet legislation onto the current reality is not fully possible due to the obligation to protect the interests of private sphere of social life, which has not been acknowledged in Soviet State. Examination of stipulated by the federal constitutional law “On Martial Law” limitations of economic rights of the citizens and legal entities, demonstrates its imperfection in part of reimbursement of cost of property value to the owners, compensation of losses to the employers in involving of their employees in other jobs, etc. Search for the balance between public and private law in the conditions of martial law allowed formulating the principle of proportionality in limitation of rights that imposes the inadmissibility of excessive legislative limitation of private sphere by establishing the boundaries of “interference” within it under various possible options of development of an armed conflict. The author underlines the need for determination the types of restrictive measures in various circumstances of an armed conflict, as well as identifies the gaps and collisions in legal regulation of the martial law.

Abstract: This research is dedicated to legal regulation of the sphere of private interests preserved in the conditions of legal regime of the martial law. Comparative analysis demonstrates the need for protecting the private sphere of public relations in terms of the market economy, and primarily private property. Shifting the restrictive measures that existed in Soviet legislation onto the current reality is not fully possible due to the obligation to protect the interests of private sphere of social life, which has not been acknowledged in Soviet State. Examination of stipulated by the federal constitutional law “On Martial Law” limitations of economic rights of the citizens and legal entities, demonstrates its imperfection in part of reimbursement of cost of property value to the owners, compensation of losses to the employers in involving of their employees in other jobs, etc. Search for the balance between public and private law in the conditions of martial law allowed formulating the principle of proportionality in limitation of rights that imposes the inadmissibility of excessive legislative limitation of private sphere by establishing the boundaries of “interference” within it under various possible options of development of an armed conflict. The author underlines the need for determination the types of restrictive measures in various circumstances of an armed conflict, as well as identifies the gaps and collisions in legal regulation of the martial law.

Abstract: The subject of this research is the possibility of application of the generally accepted legal principles in the conditions of martial law. The legislation of the Russian Federation on the questions of state defense, military service, mobilization, and realization of the regime of martial law, universally consolidates alongside the corresponding legislation, such legal regulator as the generally accepted legal principles. It remains unstudied to which extent their content meets the goals and tasks of realization of the aforementioned regime. The international practice in general, demonstrated the ambiguity of interpretation and application of the generally accepted principles of law by the international community. The Russian judicial practice shows that they face certain difficulties in implementation of the generally accepted principles and norms of the international law, indicating just their possible sources. The scientific novelty of this research consists in the necessity of improvement of the theory of generally accepted principles of law, caused by their incompleteness and ambiguity. Due to this fact, the author suggests to amend the Article 2 of the Federal Constitutional Law “On Martial Law” in the parts: “generally accepted principles of law” and “fundamental principles of law”.

Abstract: The subject of this research is the social relations that form in the conditions of martial law. The author examines the concept of legal relations and its structure, as well as separately analyzes all elements of it: participants (subjects), objects, the content of the legal relation, authority of the branches of government, their legal competency, ability to limit the subjective rights and liberties of citizens during martial law, as well as the need to restrict the legal rights of individuals and legal entities. The author justifies the ability to impose additional responsibilities upon the sides of legal relations during martial law. Analysis is conducted on the legal personality of the branches of government authority in modern France and Great Britain. The author substantiates the structure of legal relations of martial law, which consists of subjects, objects, and content, due to which the author proposes the hypothesis on permissibility of limiting the subjective rights and imposing additional responsibility upon the participants of these legal relations.

Abstract: The subject of this research is the social relations that form in the conditions of martial law. The author examines the concept of legal relations and its structure, as well as separately analyzes all elements of it: participants (subjects), objects, the content of the legal relation, authority of the branches of government, their legal competency, ability to limit the subjective rights and liberties of citizens during martial law, as well as the need to restrict the legal rights of individuals and legal entities. The author justifies the ability to impose additional responsibilities upon the sides of legal relations during martial law. Analysis is conducted on the legal personality of the branches of government authority in modern France and Great Britain. The author substantiates the structure of legal relations of martial law, which consists of subjects, objects, and content, due to which the author proposes the hypothesis on permissibility of limiting the subjective rights and imposing additional responsibility upon the participants of these legal relations.