Abstract: The subject of the research is the correspondence of tax and levy legislation to competition laws and the influence of the latter on the principal of personal execution of tax responsibility. Izvekov views the issue in relation to regulation of legal relations arising in cases of bankruptcy. Noteworthy, that there are no in-depth researches that would be devoted to particularities of execution of tax responsibility in bankruptcy cases including that at the account of controlling persons. Being already a complex topic, obligatory payments become even a more serious issue when it comes to insolvency of citizens and individual entrepreneurs who are held liable both personally and to the full extent of its assets. The research is based on the methods of historical and comparative law as well as legal modelling. In his research Izvekov demonstrates new trends in the arbitration judicial practice that have been developing under new legislation and law interpretations. As a result of the research, the author of the article describes positive and negative factors caused by amendments to legal provisions that regulate subsidiary responsibility of taxpayer (citizen or individual entrepreneur) controlling persons. The author of the article also makes a number of practical recommendations to qualify relations between a bankrupt person and controlling person as the grounds for either recovery of damage or bringing to subsidiary responsibility. 

Abstract: Legal regulation of Russian enterprises' bankruptcy attracts attenion of many researchers, however, they mostly focus on theoretical and practical issues that may arise in the process of applying bankruptcy procedures set forth by the law and quite rarely discuss such questions as the bankruptcy tax regime. The correspondence between tax and levy laws and bankruptcy laws have never been a matter of complete research before even though certain aspects have been analyzed in some researches. The present research is based on the method of comparative law. In his research Izvekov describes contradictions of the bankruptcy laws and tax and levies laws anduses such methods as legal modelling to solve the problem. The author has developed theoretical and practical recommendations on how to achieve the aforesaid objecttive in the spheres of tax legislation and bankruptcy legislation. The research results can be used by authorized authorities and arbitration courts as mechanisms of performing tax obligations modified according to the order set forth by the Bankruptcy Law. The researcher also makes recommendations on how to improve the provisions of the tax law and bankruptcy law that provide for the fiscal interest of the state. 

Abstract: The article is devoted to the question about whether it is advisable for the legislator to use the concept 'state as an involuntary creditor of an insolvent taxpayer' to improve the taxation regime when a company is bankrupt. Today's economic situation forces the government to undertake measures aimed at finding new sources of budget replenishment from corporate tax revenues when a company faces insolvency or insufficiency of assets. The author of the article analyzes prerequisites for state tax requirements taking a priviliged order in the list of credit requirements as well as studies 'pro and con' arguments. The task set forth by the author of the article is achieved through using methods and techniques of historical and international comparative law as well as systems analysis of the legislation and research literature on the matter published in the foreign states. The article may be of interest not only because it raises questions about bankruptcy but also covers issues of comparative and international law. The article gives a reader an insight into competitive legislation of Britain, British colonies and some other countries. As a result of the research, the author makes thesises that oppose to the introduction of the concept of 'state as an involuntary creditor of an insolvent taxpayer' in the Russian bankruptcy law. The author also makes recommendations on how to improve current bankruptcy law of the Russian Federation and to satisfy financial interests of the state without changing the order of credit requirement fulfilment. 

Abstract: The subject of the research is the problems of regulating legal relations arising in the process of performing tax obligations in relation to bankruptcy procesures on the account of debtor's pledged assets (Article 73 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation). The author of the article analyzes how the legal concept of pledged property being used as a way of performing tax obligations has been developing through time as well as how this instrument is used in other states and countries. The rationale of the research is caused by the need to overcome the formal inequality of rights executed by authorised bodies and unsecured creditors when a tax authority is entitled to apply requirements based on the debtor's pledged assets. The research is based on the methods of historical and international comparative law. In order to solve the proposed issue, the author has used the methods of legal modeling. As a result of a detailed analysis, the author defines positive factors of such requirements to make obligatory payments secured by the pledge of debtor's assets including equal rights of creditors and a better protection of public interests, and negative factors including omission of financial fulfilment of tax obligations when a pledge lender seizesassets. As a result of his research, Izvekov provides authorities and arbitration courts with the mechanisms to fulfil tax obligations secured by the pledge in case of bankruptcy procedures. The author also makes recommendations on how to improve applicable legislation ensuring the fiscal interest of the government. 

Abstract: According to the author of the article, the concept of 'obligatory payment' set forth by Article 2 of the Bankruptcy Law cannot be considered as complete and covering all kinds of public claims that may arise in the process of bankruptcy proceedings. In theory and practice the term is widely interpreted as other obligatory payments such as execution fee, pollution fee and customs duty. However, it is impossible to fully study the category of obligatory payment without considering an authorized authority having exclusive competence to impose obligatory payment requests in bankruptcy proceedings. Yet, such authorized authority usually imposes not only obligatory payments but also other public claims (for example, debt recovery under the government contract). For this reason, it is necessary to define borders between obligatory payments and other public claims. The research is based on the methods of induction, deduction as well as methods of historical and comparative (including international) law. In his research Izvekov describes contradictions in legal and judicial practice of interpretation the term 'obligatory payment' and competences of an authorized authority in bankruptcy proceedings. Special attention is paid to improving the mechanism of collecting debts under public claims in bankruptcy proceedings. The author also analyzes foreign publications and articles on the matter and makes his own suggestions on how to develop the institution of tax lien in order to ensure the compliance with the requirements imposed by such an authorized authority in the Russian Federation. The author of the article also provides theoretical and practical recommendations on how to solve relevant issues in the spheres of tax legislation and bankruptcy legislation. 

Abstract: The subject of the research is the problems arising in the process of application of tax and levy legislation and competition laws. Particular usses related to the topic of the research are sometimes viewed by researchers who analyze the process of regulation of legal relations in case of bankruptcy. However, there is a lack of comprehensive researches on particular issues of fulfiment of obligations to pay VAT in case of bankruptcy. The author of the present research article examine such aspects of the topic as the development of the legal concept of tax responsibilities of an insolvent taxpayer, tax effects of the decision to sell property and/or property rights of an insolvent taxpayer by single lot, debtor's assets, to replace debtor's assets and seize an insolvent taxpayer's property by a mortgagee. Special attention is paid to the classification of legal approaches developed as a result of changes in the legislation and explanations of supreme judicial authorities. The research is based on the methods of historical and comparative legal studies. The researcher describes contradictions in the legislation and judicial practice regarding fulfilment of obligations to pay value-added tax in case of taxpayer's bankruptcy. Legal views are calssified depending on the periods of applicability of different versions of the Tax Code. The author also uses the methods of legal modeling when analyzing obligations to pay VAT when property has been sold as a property complex or by single lot as well as when a debtor's assets have been replaced. The researcher offers theoretical and practical recommendations on solving the issues arising in the process of application of tax laws and bankruptcy laws. The researcher also makes an attempt to systematize different interpretations of laws and fill in the gaps in legal regulation. As a result of his detailed analysis of tax obligations to pay VAT, the author defines positive and negative factors of selling the bunkrupt's property by one lot, debtor's enterprises or assets, replacement of debtor's assets and seizure of an insolvent taxpayer's property by a mortgagee. As a result, the author offers mechanisms of minimization of losses for taxpayers in case of bankruptcy and relevant tax control activities conducted in relation to both debtors and their counterparts. The author makes recommendations in improving the provisions about justified tax benefits through making amendments in the tax and bankruptcy laws. In particular, the author offers to make certain conditions that would support the fiscal interest of the governnent. Peculiar conclusions have been made regarding autonomous legal standing of creditors' association whose decisions often result in tax consequences for the taxpayer in debt or his counterparts.
 

Abstract: This article elucidates the prospects for posing tax questions in the transboundary bankruptcy cases on the examples of the BRICS countries. We will formulate the main collisions in comparison of the sequence of tax requirements in state law of the BRICS countries, assess the situation of direct involvement of the state in bankruptcy cases in another country, and establish paths for overcoming the issues arising in the process. The author defines the theoretical foundations of the influence and cooperation of the fiscal demands of a state with similar fiscal interests of another state. The author explores approaches of the BRICS countries towards the category of public demands and correlation with the concept of mandatory payment. The article substantiates the disagreements of national legislation on priority of satisfaction of demands of the creditors in some of the BRICS countries. The presented material can be useful for researchers of international private law and international tax law in dealing with cases of transboundary bankruptcy.

Abstract: The present article is devoted to the taxation matters arising in the process of cross-border bankruptcy as well as ways to harmonize legislation systems of the BRICS member-states for this purpose. In his research Izvekov defines the main problems related to the priority of fiscal requirements in the bankruptcy legislation of the BRICS countries, analyzes whether a state may participate in the case of bankruptcy while in the territory of another contracting state and offers relevant solutions. The researcher outlines the theoretical grounds for the influence of fiscal requirements of the state at the extraterritorial level. The research is based on the comparative analysis of international practices of trans-border bankruptcies, national bankruptcy legislation and issues of insolvency of the BRICS countries. The author also describes conceptual contradictions in the priority of creditors' claims in some BRICS countries. Izvekov demonstrates how the main results of the research can be applied to the BRICS commonwealth and suggest that government authorities should be able to participate in the proceedings initiated in the territory of other BRICS countries. It is assumed that the present research article can be of interest not only for those who are interested in trans-border bankruptcy but also for those who are concerned about general issues of comparative legal studies and international jurisdiction.