Abstract: The subject of this article is the examination of positions of a contract on realization of the rights of members of associations regarding acquisition or alienation of shares at certain value or circumstances, as well as refraining from such alienation until arrival of certain circumstances. In addition, within the framework of this publication, the author pursues correlation between the conditions on acquisition or alienation of shares and peculiarities of the status of public and private corporations. The author determines the key goals in determination of conditions associated with acquisition or alienation of shares, as well as refraining from such alienation:
 1) Resolution of corporate conflicts; ensuring of realization of corporate rights for achieving of goal of a contract and continuation of realization of action on achieving of a set goal;
2) Preservation of the “pool” of shares held by the parties of a contract for participation and voting at general meeting of shareholders.
 

Abstract: The research subject is the key peculiarities of corporate agreement with third parties stipulated by clause 9, article 67.2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (part one). Special attention is given to the differences between a corporate agreement between the members of a company and a corporate agreement between the members of a company and third parties. The author considers the similarities and differences between a corporate agreement and covenants. The author applies general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis) and special methods (formal legal and logical). The author reveals the main differences between a corporate agreement between the members of the company and an agreement between the members of a company and third parties. Firstly, a corporate agreement is a multilateral agreement, and a corporate agreement with third parties is a bilateral agreement between the members of a company as a unit and a third party. Secondly, a corporate agreement initiates an organizational relation, and a corporate agreement with a third party initiates a binding relation. Thirdly, the conclusion of a corporate agreement is conditioned by the common interests of the parties, and the conclusion of a corporate agreement with a third party is conditioned by the interest of the third party, i.e. the decrease of the risk of obligation breach by the members of a company which are a party to the agreement. 

Abstract: The subject of this article is the examination of peculiarities of the agreement on exercising the rights of parties of organizations, which consists of the internal positions defined within the framework of the Clause 4 of the Article 66.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 1). This publication also reviews the opinions of the legal expert regarding the place and role of such agreement among the internal documents of organization, as well as provides the author’s perspective. In addition, the author identifies the understanding of the right to determine these positions in the context of the corresponding agreement within the corporate relations between the parties and organization. Taking into account the peculiarities of corporate relations, it is proven that the right to determine in the agreement of exercising internal positions of the rights of all involved parties of private company, represents the right to unilateral regulation of internal positions, which belongs to all parties within the framework of corporate relations between participant and the company.

Abstract: The subject of this article is the examination of peculiarities of the agreement on exercising the rights of parties of organizations, which consists of the internal positions defined within the framework of the Clause 4 of the Article 66.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 1). This publication also reviews the opinions of the legal expert regarding the place and role of such agreement among the internal documents of organization, as well as provides the author’s perspective. In addition, the author identifies the understanding of the right to determine these positions in the context of the corresponding agreement within the corporate relations between the parties and organization. Taking into account the peculiarities of corporate relations, it is proven that the right to determine in the agreement of exercising internal positions of the rights of all involved parties of private company, represents the right to unilateral regulation of internal positions, which belongs to all parties within the framework of corporate relations between participant and the company.

Abstract: The research subject is the definition of the notion and the meaning of a corporate agreement concluded for the purpose of influencing the formation of the will of the association. The author defines the notion of a corporate agreement and points at the theoretical aspects of understanding of a legal entity’s will and the process of its formation. The research is aimed at the analysis of the possibilities which are provided by this agreement by means of application of corporate and non-corporate rights (acquisition or carve-out of shares or forgoing the carve-out) in this sphere. The author applies general scientific (analysis and synthesis) and special scientific (formal-legal and logical) research methods. The author comes to the following conclusions:
Firstly, from the position of the subject matter, a corporate agreement is a bilateral or a multilateral deal, which:
1. either is a beforehand defined way of influencing the process of the association’s will formation, if it is not concluded by all the members of the association;
2. or contains the “quasi will” of the association if, firstly, the association is not public, secondly, all its members are the parties to the agreement.
It is necessary to take into consideration that if in the first case the relations are regulated only by means of binding provisions, in the second case corporate legislation is also involved. But at the same time, in both cases the legally established procedures should be taken into account.
Secondly, the author considers the provisions of an agreement, connected with the acquisition or carve-out of shares, as aimed at destabilizing relations between the parties to the agreement and supporting particular positions. The author notes that this agreement can be used for other purposes, not connected with the subject matter.