Reference:
Prizhennikova A.N..
Administrative justice in the modern world: topical issue.
// NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – № 11.
– P. 123-130.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.11.1031.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.11.1031
Read the article
Abstract: In Russia theory and practice of administrative justice have long history: from the quasi-judicial institutions of administrative justice ("mixed" tribunals) headed by the First Department of the Governing Senate, which was characterized by a number of significant shortcomings in organizational and practical aspects to the partially formed model created by the Temporary Government. Then the problem was seemingly solved in the Russian legal science in early XX century, which was reflected in the legislative definition of administrative justice as a form of judicial power. However, in the modern conditions the discussions on the primary justice models, which would be most adequate to the Russian situation, are revived. The approach of the representatives of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation is quite a vivid example, they offer to form a system of Administrative Chambers within the framework of administrative branch of government. They should be accountable to the Administration of the President or to the Ministry of Justice at the federal level, and to the Plenipotentiaries of the President in the Federal Districts at the level of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the chambers may be specialized: tax, customs, anti-monopoly, currency regulation and control, cadastral reporting. It basically would mean making administrative justice a system of quasi-judicial institutions, which Russia used to have in the XIX century. Such a situation requires a cleare definition on the issues of correlation between the terms "administrative justice" and "administrative judicial procedure". The issues of formation and development of administrative justice were of interest to many administrative law scholars, such as D.N. Bakhrakh, A.B. Zelentsov, I.V. Panova, N.G. Salischeva, V.V. Skitovich, Y.N. Starilov, M.S. Studenikina, N.Y. Khamaneva, etc. The author makes a conclusion that studies of the foreign experience may assist the Russian Federation in choosing the optimum approaches to the formation of its own model of administrative justice, using the practical experience. Russia needs administrative courts. Administrative cases should be dealt with within an independent administrative process, and to be regulated by the Administrative Judicial Procedural Code, which would establish methodology, other procedural acts on hearing and resolving cases arising from such legal relations.
Keywords: administrative justice, administrative judicial procedure, administrative courts, administrative dispute, justice, specialized courts, courts of general jurisdiction, arbitration courts, civil judicial procedure, administrative legal relations
References:
Zhadnov Yu. Sistema administrativnykh sudov ne dolzhna sovpadat' s administrativno-territorial'nym deleniem // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-№ 9.-S. 24; Salishcheva N.G., Khamaneva N.Yu. Administrativnaya yustitsiya, administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2002.-№ 1.-S. 8; Vlasov A. Kakoy budet administrativnaya yustitsiya? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2002.-№ 11.-S. 18; Studenikina M. Administrativnaya yustitsiya: kakoy put' izbrat' Rossii? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-1996.-№ 5.-S. 36; Bakhrakh D. Nuzhna spetsializatsiya sudey, a ne sudov // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2003.-№
-S. 11; Radchenko V. Kompetentsiya administrativnykh sudov nam ponyatna // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2001.-№ 6.-S. 10; Ego zhe. Razvitie sistemy administrativnoy yustitsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2005.-№ 4.-S. 4; Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnye sudy: novye argumenty «za» i «protiv» / Pod red. V.N. Radchenko. M., 2004.-S. 95; Prizhennikova A.N. Aktual'nye voprosy v sovershenstvovanii administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii // Sbornik molodykh uchenykh, MGIU. M