Economic control and management
|
Reference:
Shakirov, S.M. (2026). Criteria and indicators of the effectiveness of scientific and technological programs for the development of human capital in small high-tech companies in the context of accelerated scientific and technological development. Finance and Management, 3, 220–246. . https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7802.2026.3.79774
|
|
Abstract:
The subject of the research is the criteria and indicators of the effectiveness of scientific and technological programs for the development of human capital in small high-tech companies (SHTCs) in the context of accelerated scientific and technological development. The object of the study is the scientific and technological programs themselves aimed at developing human capital, implemented at the state, sectoral, regional, inter-organizational, and corporate levels with the participation or in the interests of SHTCs – knowledge-intensive startups, engineering companies, spin-offs from scientific and educational organizations, and high-tech service enterprises. Special attention is given to how the resource constraints of SHTCs, the high concentration of key competencies among individual carriers, project-based work organization, and the rapid obsolescence of specialized knowledge impose specific requirements on the content structure, operationalization, and multi-level nature of evaluation indicators. The effects arising simultaneously at three levels – program, company, and worker – necessitate a coherent system of criteria that reflects both the immediate results of training and long-term changes in the innovative, economic, and organizational activities of companies. The research relies on systemic, process, and resource approaches, elements of human capital theory, intellectual capital theory, and dynamic capabilities theory, as well as the logic of program-target evaluation. Methods of conceptual analysis, literature and regulatory framework systematization, indicator operationalization have been employed, with the analytical framework being the chain of "input–process–output–effect." The scientific novelty of the study lies in the construction of a systematic set of criteria and indicators at the intersection of human capital theory, SHTC research, and program evaluation, tailored to the specifics of SHTCs and the dynamics of accelerated scientific and technological development. Six complementary groups of criteria have been formulated: development of personnel competencies and learnability; research and innovation activity; productivity and quality of labor; economic and financial results; organizational and managerial effects; sustainability and reproducibility of human capital. Examples of indicators that meet the requirements of operationalizability, verifiability, low resource intensity of collection, and dynamic sensitivity have been defined for each group. The proposed architecture is determined by the intersection of the six groups of criteria, the cross-cutting logic of "input–process–output–effect," and three levels of assessment (program – company – worker), which ensures methodological consistency and flexibility of configuration for a specific type of program. The limitations of the system are justified, and directions for further research are identified, including empirical verification and integration with models of technological maturity of SHTCs.
Keywords:
human capital, small high-tech firms, science and technology programmes, accelerated technological development, performance evaluation, criteria and indicators, multilevel assessment, programme-targeted approach, innovation activity, small technology companies