Reference:
Batler W.E..
Elements of Supranationalism
in Eurasian Economic Community
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. – 2013. – ¹ 3.
– P. 455-459.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devotes to the examination of aspects of supranationalism in interstate integration communities
on the example of the Eurasian Economic Community (former Commission of Tax Union). The article deals with legal
aspects of international treaties as basic mechanisms for regulation of integration processes. The “contract theory” of
compulsory decisions of international organizations is analyzed. The main point in the article is analysis of the Order of
the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan of November 5, 2009, No. 6 On official interpretation of provisions
of the article 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in view of procedure of international organizations
and its bodies’ judgment execution.
Keywords: interstate integration communities, Eurasian Economic Commission, international treaties, compulsory decisions, supranationalism.
References:
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Kazakhstan.
Dogovor o sozdanii edinoy tamozhennoy territorii i formirovanii tamozhennogo soyuza ot 6 oktyabrya 2007 g.
Dogovor o Komissii tamozhennogo soyuza ot 6 oktyabrya 2007 g.
Dogovor o Tamozhennom kodekse tamozhennogo soyuza ot 27 noyabrya 2009 g.
Dogovor o Evraziyskoy ekonomicheskoy komissii ot 18 noyabrya 2011 g.
Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 30 maya 2005 g. «O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Respubliki Kazakhstan».
Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 12 avgusta 2010 ¹ 1037 «Pravila podgotovki informatsii o vy-polnenii mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov Respubliki Kazakhstan i predstavleniya ee na rassmotrenie Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan, a takzhe soglasovaniya proektov resheniy mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy, uchastnitsey ko-torykh yavlyaetsya Respublika Kazakhstan, i ikh realizatsii, podgotovki mezhdunarodnykh meropriyatiy Respubliki Kazakhstan s uchastiem Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan i vypolneniya dostignutykh dogovorennostey».
Normativnoe Posta
Reference:
Sazonova K.L..
Concept of “International State Crimes”
as the Basis of International Responsibility:
Comparative Analysis of the Doctrinal Positions
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. – 2013. – ¹ 3.
– P. 460-465.
Read the article
Abstract: This article devotes to the one of the most controversial concepts of comparative international law — the
concept of “international state crimes”. The author examines the views of representatives of both domestic and foreign
schools of international law concerning this concept, and highlights key issues and controversial aspects. The article
also contains the analysis of the Report of the International Law Commission “Responsibility of States for Internationally
Wrongful Acts” of 2001. The special attention is devoted to the category “serious breach of an obligation arising under
a peremptory norm of general international law”. The author assesses the applicability of the concept of “international
state crimes” to the existing international realities in the context of the frequent use of force in international relations.
Moreover, the author analyzes what kind of responsibility can be realized by state which committed serious breach of
international norms; examines the forms and types of international responsibility of states, and also compares the positions
of the various researchers upon this issue. The problem of international responsibility of states for the use of force
is also important because, despite its obvious relevance, in the domestic doctrine in recent years there has been a lack of
publications upon this theme, especially in comparison with the western doctrine.
Keywords: comparative law, crime, state responsibility, force, doctrine, offense, genocide, aggression, law.
References:
Barsegov Yu.G. Genotsid armyan — prestuplenie po mezhdunarodnomu pravu. M., 2000. 272 s.
Bartosh M. Raznorodnye pravovye istochniki v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Mezhdunarodnaya poli-tika. ¹ 575. Belgrad, 1974.
Brounli Ya. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Kn. 1. M., 1977. 535 s.
Vystuplenie i otvety na voprosy Ministra inostrannykh del Rossii S.V. Lavrova na vstreche so studentami i kollektivom Diplomaticheskoy akademii MID Rossii, Moskva, 25 fevralya 2013 g. // http://www.mid.ru/brp_4. nsf/0/AD5CCC0AF4E15AEC44257B1D003DA311
Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava OON «Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv za mezhdunarodno-protivoprav-nye deyaniya» 2001 g. (s kommentariyami).
Kuris P. Mezhdunarodnye pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennost' gosudarstva. Vil'nyus, 1973. 280 s.
Levin D.B. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. M., 1966 152 s.
Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. M., 2004.
Moshenskaya N.V. Problema otvetstvennosti za genotsid. M., 2008.
Oppen
Reference:
C. Baudenbacher.
The European Free Trade Association Court
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. – 2011. – ¹ 6.
– P. 4-20.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the stages of the European Free Trade Association Court formation and development
— “birth”, “growing-up”, “lawful age”, and “maturity”, — results and perspectives of its activity. The problem
of legal Nature of Agreement on the Common Economic Space is researched. The conclusion on basic difference between
the common economic space law and the European Union law is made. It consists in the absence of determined
common politics. The question on cooperation between the European Free Trade Association Court and the Court
of Justice of the European Union in view of regime of law interpretation uniformity is analyzed. The European Free
Trade Association Court is recognized by the European courts as reputable judicial instance. The national courts and
government of the States-Parties of the Common Economic Space and European Free Trade Association are guided
by its judgments.
Keywords: the Common Economic Space, the European Free Trade Association Court, law interpretation, human rights, basic principles of the Common Economic Space law, primacy of the Common Economic Space law, direct application of the Common Economic Space law, responsibility of state, precautionary principle, principle of uniformity, principle of reciprocity, prejudicial judgment, access to justice.
References:
Alemanno A. “A Tale of Inter/Judicial Dialogue and Jurisprudential Cross-fertilization: the Precautionary Principle in EU, EEA and WTO Law” in Baudenbacher (ed.) Dialogue Between Courts in Times of Globalization and Regionalization, Intl. Dispute Resolution Volume 2, Stuttgart, 2010, 27 ff., 29 ff.
Bast J. “European Economic Area (EEA)” paragraph 22 // www.mpepil.com
Baudenbacher C. “Governments before the EFTA Court”, Festkrift til C. Gulmann, Kobenhavn, 2006.
Baudenbacher C. “The EFTA Court, the ECJ and the Latter’s Advocates General — a Tale of Judicial Dialogue” in Continuity and Change in EU Law in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs, edited by A. Arnull, P. Eckhout and Takis Tridimas, Oxford, 2008.
Baudenbacher C. “Trademark Law and Parallel Imports in a Globalized World — Recent Developments in Europe with Special Regard to the Legal Situation in the United States” Fordham Int’l L.J. 645, 1998.
Baudenbacher C. “Wie sollen Konflikte im Verhaeltnis Schweiz-EU geloest warden?” Festschrif