Abstract: The research subject includes the relations between legally and organizationally independent public authorities which are formed according to the established legal order for executing particular tasks and functions within their competence, and invested with authorities in the sphere of taxation. The author considers such aspects of the topic as legal jurisdictional powers of federal executive authorities in the sphere of taxation. Special attention is paid to the study of the competence of subjects, pursuing jurisdictional activities in tax sphere. The author applies the systems method and the method of expert assessments. The author concludes that the administrative-jurisdictional competence of federal executive authorities in the sphere of taxation is a statutory amount of state authoritative powers, fulfilled by the authorized bodies in the established procedural form, and aimed at the solution of a certain legal case in the sphere of taxation and prevention of a tax offence; the content of administrative-jurisdictional competence includes the target, object, procedural, and territorial components. The novelty of the study lies in the competence of the subjects, pursuing jurisdictional activities in the sphere of taxation, as a statutory list of issues which should be solved in the process of tax jurisdiction organization. 

Abstract: The article considers the problems of prevention and suppression of administrative offences in the sphere of consumer market by police and other federal executive authorities. The object of the article includes social relations connected with enforcement of law on consumer market. The author details the problems of administrative-legal regulation of consumer market. Special attention is paid to the administrative activities of police in combating crimes in the sphere of consumer market. Considerable attention is paid to the issues of enhancement of efficiency of administrative coercive measures implementation in this sphere. The author uses the general philosophical, theoretical, and empirical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical, comparative jurisprudence), the methods used in specific sociological research (statistics, expert opinions, and others).In the conclusion the author identifies the significant problems related to the administrative-legal regulation of activities of police and other federal executive authorities in the sphere of consumer market. The specific contribution of the author lies in the fact that the article reveals the contents of consumer market in administrative law. The novelty of this paper lies in the fact that the author concludes about the necessity for a more effective management in the spheres of trade and consumer market.

Abstract: It is noted in the article that the theoretical developments allow one to draw a conclusion that based upon their functional purpose the legal prohibitions may implement prevention and interception of offences in various spheres of administrative legal regulation, as well as serving the information purpose.  Additionally, generalization of a number of opinions on legal prohibitions within the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations in the sphere of administrative legal reality allows one to stat that prohibitions serve different functions in different branches of law.  However, the uniting force for all of the legal prohibitions is that they limit the anti-social or illegal behavior. The protective function of administrative law prohibitions is due to the social need for the protection of interests of individuals, society and state from unwanted acts.  This function is implemented via legal responsibilty for prohibited acts. Recognizing the significant role of administrative law prohibitions in the sphere of preservation of the legal order, one should take into account the realistic capabilities of these legal means.

Abstract: It is noted in the article that theoretical developments allow to make a conclusion, that based on its functional purpose legal prohibitions may implement prevention and interception of offences in various spheres of administrative legal regulation, as well as having an informative role. Additionally, generalization of several positions on legal prohibitions within the mechanism of legal reguation of social relations in the sphre of administrative legal reality allows one to note that prohibitions implement different social functions in various legal spheres.  However, the uniting element for all of the types of legal prohibition is the fact that they limit anti-social or unlawful behavior.  Protective function of the administrative legal prohibition is due to the social need to protect the interests of a person. The protective function of the administrative law prohibition is due to the social need to protect interests of a person, society and state from undesirable events.  This function is implemented via application of legal responsibility for the prohibited acts. Recognizing a significant role of administrative legal prohibition in the sphere of protection of public order, one should take into account the real capabilities of these legal means.