Abstract: The authors of the article describe the basic trends in transformation of taxation of wealth in Russia from the point of view of neo-industrial economic paradigm and inclusive economic growth. The authors describe compliance of the principles of neoindustrialization with the provisions of the concept of inclusive growth, their complementary nature in solving the problems associated with the transition from raw materials export model of GDP growth towards a comprehensive (inclusive) sustainable economic development. It is proposed to extend the definitions of the object of taxation of property in Russia and luxury category to the category of wealth. In order to harmonize tax systems, the wealth tax is defined according to the Classification of Property Taxes fixed by the Guidelines on Government Finance Statistics of the IMF for the developed countries in 2014. The comparative analysis of the wealth tax contribution to GDP and tax revenues in the 8 OECD countries and Russia allows to prove the fact that the regulative potential of the wealth tax is not fully used in the Russian economy. By analyzing the hierarchy of taxes depending on their degree of compatibility with economic growth the authors emphasize the importance of the wealth tax not only as a device to limit wealth inequality and encourage a better use of major assets but also as a counterbalance to the possible negative consequences of tax incentives of neo-industrial development. In the short term, the authors suggest that we should return to the estate tax and gift tax, and in the long term (when building an adequate system of international administration) it will be better to use the net wealth tax. 

Abstract: Transition to the neo industrial development requires building an effective system of waste processing and resource recycling. This would allow to change the quality of the economic growth and to encourage research and development and innovations as well as to overcome environmental constraints and to improve the quality of life of the population. One of the main elements of this system is the recycling of vehicle waste. The financial basis for the development of industry of auto recycling in provided through collection of car (vehicle) recycling fees in Russia. Funds from the proceeds are used to subsidize infrastructure projects and expenditures of private recycling companies. In this regard, the objective of the study was to assess the effects of fiscal regulation of recycling vehicle waste in Russia and to determine the main directions for its improvement during the transition to neo industrial development. The authors of the article compare the contribution of the automotive industry and the recycling industry in the EU and the Russian Federation economies. Based on the example of many years of experience in the development of autorecycling in the EU in accordance with the requirements of the Directive End of Life Vehicles Directive the authors examine the functional purpose of vehicle recycling fees. On the basis of the comparison of forecast and actual figures for the amount of subsidies of autorecycling and vehicle recycling fee accumulated in the federal budgets , the authors assess the effectiveness of the collection of vehicle recycling fees in Russia. According to the results of the study the authors have concluded that there is a gap between the theory and practice of collection of the vehicle recycling fee in Russia which is demonstrated by untypical for this payment protective and environmental functions during the operation of the car but not recycling. However, every year the gap between the volumes of incoming car vehicle fee and the amount of subsidies for car recycling is increasing which demonstrates the dysfunction of payment as an incentive for the development of vechicle recycling. In conclusion,  the authors offer the basic directions for improving the fiscal regulation  of the development of autorecycling in Russia emphasizing the need to ensure the conditions for neo industrialization.

Abstract: The key problem in the realization of ideas for neo-industrialization of Russia is the deep divide between mining and processing industries, which are the object of this research. The large-scale neo-industrial reforms require mobilization of a significant amount of finances, activating reforms within the tax system, which provides substantial portion of the revenue into the budget. As a result, the subject of this research is the tax instruments for regulating the mining, processing, and oil industries. The goal of this research is to evaluate the rationality of the government tax policy in the context of the need to shift from exporting raw materials model of economy to neo-industrial. The author analyzes the data from the usage of GDP for the period from 1995 to 2014, and assesses the tax revenue from the mining and processing industry within the budget system for the period from 2006 to 2014. The research into the priorities of the tax policy of the Russian Federation and the conducted analysis of the statistical information demonstrate a growth in preferentiality of the tax regime towards the oil industry in the post-crisis period of 2008,