Rostovtseva M.V., Lutoshkina V.N., Koreneva V.V., Chistokhina A.V., Klimuk Y.V., Grishina G.V. —
The Relationship Between the Level of Reflection and Self-regulation Among Teachers of a General Education Institution
// Psychology and Psychotechnics. – 2022. – ¹ 4.
– P. 101 - 118.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2022.4.38860
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/ptmag/article_38860.html
Read the article
Abstract: The purpose of our work is to identify the relationship between reflection and self–regulation among teachers of a general education institution. Reflection is one of the most important mechanisms of self-regulation, as the ability to manage the development of one own competencies, i.e. to carry out personal and professional growth. The development of self-regulation helps a modern teacher to find an individual style of professional activity, allows him to achieve adequate professional and personal self-esteem, predict and analyze the results of his activities.
Subject of research: the relationship of reflection and self-regulation among teachers of a general education institution.
The following were selected as the main research methods:
1. Methodology for diagnosing the level of development of reflexivity (Karpova A.V.).
2. Basic questionnaire "Style of self–regulation of behavior - SSPM" (Morosanova V.I.). The study was conducted on the basis of secondary schools No. 4 and No. 19. Krasnoyarsk. In total, 56 teachers aged 30 to 35 years with more than 5 years of experience in school participated in the study. The sample was mainly made up of women (93%) – subject teachers. After statistical data processing, the following conclusions are made.
Teachers with high and low levels of reflection have differences in the level of general self-regulation. There is also some peculiarity in the development of self-regulation processes and regulatory-personal properties. Therefore, we can say that the hypothesis put forward at the beginning of our study has been confirmed. That is, the relationship of reflection and self-regulation among teachers of a general education institution exists. This fact should be taken into account in order to influence the process of professional self-development, to understand the reasons for his professional failures and failures and to regulate his pedagogical activity.
Rostovtseva M.V., Kovalev V.N., Mashanov A.A., Lutoshkina V.N. —
Psychological and pedagogical support of athletically gifted children
// Pedagogy and education. – 2019. – ¹ 4.
– P. 34 - 42.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2019.4.30626
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/ppmag/article_30626.html
Read the article
Abstract: This article is dedicated to the question of psychological and pedagogical support of children in sports. The three stages of psychological and pedagogical support are determined: 1) athlete selection using psychological-pedagogical means and mechanisms; 2) continuous support in the process of athletic training; 3) monitoring of changes of psychological-pedagogical characteristics. The authors examine the details peculiarities of the first stage – athletes selection; highlights the key psychological-pedagogical characteristics of an athlete that must be considered at that stage; neurodynamic, emotional, cognitive, personality orientation, and specificities of interpersonal skills of a child. The main trends in psychological and pedagogical support of athletically gifted children are determined: diagnostic, consultative, and monitoring. The authors come to the conclusion that psychological and pedagogical support of an athletically gifted child is a complex and multi-aspect process, implying the life-long side by side journey of a pedagogue-psychologist and an athlete. The fundamental goal of the modern Russian higher school consists in preparation of sport psychologists-tutors with all essential competences for supporting such children.