Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

Crimean realities in F.'s travelogue Remy "Crimea in ethnographic, geographical and historical terms" (1872)

Krygin Roman Vyacheslavovich

ORCID: 0000-0002-9840-8498

Lecturer, Department of German Philology, Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov

295014, Russia, respublika Krym, g. Simferopol', Turistov, 24

romakrygin@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0749.2024.1.69645

EDN:

MSSAWA

Received:

20-01-2024


Published:

27-01-2024


Abstract: The article is devoted to identifying and structuring realities in the travelogue of the German-speaking traveler Franz Remy, who visited the Crimean peninsula in the 19th century. The features of the realities mentioned in the work of a traveler who visited Crimea in the 19th century are considered. The purpose of the work is to identify, characterize, and establish the features of the realities of Crimea based on the travelogue F. Remy. The relevance of the work is due to both the increased interest in travelogue as a genre, and to the linguocultural aspect of the study of German-speaking travelogues. Of particular interest is how exactly the German-speaking traveler saw Crimea in the 19th century. The methodological basis was the works of S.I. Vlahov, S.P. Florin, L.N. Soboleva, E.R. Ponomareva, A.A. Kretova, N.A. Fenenko. The article clarifies the concepts of “reality” and “travelogue” based on a critical analysis of theoretical sources. A classification of realities is presented. The practical research was based on the material of Franz Remy’s travelogue “Die Krim in ethnographischer, landschaftlicher und hygienischer Beziehung”, published in the 19th century. Particular attention is paid to primary and secondary nominations of the realities of Crimea. The article provides examples of realities from the categories of astyonyms, comonyms, hydronyms, oronyms, urbanonyms, horonyms, highlights personalities, characters for the Crimea of the 19th century, as well as ethnographic realities. The article also discusses the traveler’s use of doublet names of Crimean cities. A conclusion is drawn about which categories of realities were characteristic of the Crimean Peninsula of the 19th century. This article may be of interest to specialists in the field of philology and history.


Keywords:

Crimea, reality, travel notes, German language, travelogue, Franz Remy, travel, Russia, voyage, culture

This article is automatically translated.

For a practical analysis of the data on Crimea compiled by a German traveler, it is important to define the concepts of "reality" and "travelogue" and establish its types in the work under study.

The concept of "reality" in Russian literature has been analyzed by various authors.

In the work of V. M. Rossels, realities are understood as "foreign words that denote concepts, objects, phenomena that do not exist in the everyday life of the people into whose language the works are translated" [5; 21].

According to G. D. Tomakhin, realities are "the names of objects of material culture inherent only to certain nations and peoples, historical facts, state institutions, names of national and folklore heroes, mythological creatures, etc." [7; 70].

           L. N. Sobolev presents realities as "... words from national life that do not exist in other languages, because these objects and phenomena do not exist in other countries." [6; 38].

          Related concepts for the term "travelogue" are such as "travel notes" or "travel notes". For the first time, Burton Holmes uses this term to describe the performances, which are narrated about the travels he has done. In the XX century, the concept of travelogue was more well–established - "Travel report: a book, article, or film describing the places that people have visited and what they have encountered." [4; p. 14]

          Let's move on to the direct analysis of F. Remy's travelogue. It is worth noting that the work of F. Remy, despite its name, is written in simpler language than the travelogues of other German travelers who set clearer scientific goals (for example, P.S. Pallas, who paid attention to the flora and fauna of the Crimea or G. Abbikh, who studied the geology of the peninsula). [11, 13, 14]

Let's consider the thematic classes of realities mentioned in Remy's work:

geographical names, including:

- oikonyms

a) astyonyms:Saki, Eupatori a / Koslow / Geslew, Sewastopol, Chersones, Bagtschi-Sarai / Perle der Krim / Gartenpallast, Balaklawa, Alupka, Jalta, Gurzuf, Aluschta, Sympheropol / Ak-metschet / Wei-e Kirche, Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe / Stadt der Sieben G ? tten / alte Taurien, Sudak, Karassubasar, Inkerman / Inkjerman. (total – 25);

b) homonyms: Achtiar / Att-jar, Livadia, Orianda (total – 4);

- hydronyms

a) potanomimy (names of rivers) Tschernaja Retschka (total – 1);

b) limnonyms (names of lakes) Schlammb ? der von Saki (total -1);

- oronyms (names of land-based relief objects):

 a) the names of the mountains Tschufut-Kale, Mangup (total – 2);

b) the name of the valleys Katscha Thal / Bjout Dufen (total – 2);

- urbanonyms (proper names of inner-city objects):

a) coffee houses: Kaffeh - user (total – 1);

b) capes: Tatill-Bur ? nn, Uff-Bur ? nn (total – 2)

c) stations: Burundi (total – 1)

d) Markets: Laufchan basar (total – 1)

e) hotels: Rlubb, G ? denn (total – 2)

- burials (proper names of territories) Krim, Jaila (total – 2)

- personalities

a) proper names Kornilow, Istomin, Rachimow, Lasarew, Nuri Baffri, Gelim Ghirei Chan, Katharina II (total – 7)

b) the names Anife, Urie, Gaineb, Gulsum (total – 4)

ethnographic realities:

a) religious realities: Mullah, Mohamedanern, Minarets (total – 3);

b) ethnic groups: Tataren, Karaimen (total – 2);

c) clothing: Turban, M e (total – 2);

d) Measure: Werste (total -1)

e) military realities: Forts Konstantin, Michael, Battarie nummer 4 (total -3).

Speaking of astyonyms, it is necessary to mention in more detail such as:

Astyonyms.

Eupatoria / Koslow / Geslew. The object of the name is the city of Yevpatoria. Remy, visiting this city, talks about the etymology of this word. It is noteworthy that the author explains the etymology of the city. (ges Luge, which in this case should be translated into Russian as "viewing slit" and Lew – house) [14, p. 6]. The etymology of the word is explained by the traveler by the fact that in this city houses have small windows. The modern name of the city – Yevpatoria was given by the Russian population in honor of the king of ancient Pontus, Mithridates VI Evpator. In Crimea, Franz Remy also notes the presence of unusual European "coffee houses" in this city (Kaffeh-user).

Franz Remy notes that the local population "does nothing to develop such an important place" (Leider tut die Bev ? lkerung nichts f ? r ? bung so wichtigen Ortes) [14, p. 9], "neither good rural houses nor a sufficient choice of food can be found here" (Man findet hier weder gute Landh ? user noch hinreichende Auswahl von Lebensmittel" [14, p. 10], "Tatars and Karaites do not completely reject foreigners. Their egoism goes beyond all bounds" (Tataren und Karaimen nehmen Fremde gar nicht auf. Hat Ihre Egoismus zu extrem ausgebildet») [14, c. 8].

Sewastopol. The object of the name is the city of Sevastopol. The traveler notes Konstantinovskaya, Mikhailovskaya and Battery number 4 (Forts Konstantin, Michael und die Batterie Nummer 4). The traveler mentions a village that once existed near the city of Sevastopol, namely Akhtiyar (Die Bucht, an welcher das tatarische D?rfer Achtiar oder Att–jar lag war im Jahre 1783 zum ersten Mal von den Russischen Flotte bei Gelegenheit Einverleibung der Krim befe?t.) This settlement, which was formerly under the rule of the Mangup kadylyk, was renamed in 1784, to Sevastopol by order of Catherine II (Das Dorf welches unter der Botm?sigkeit Mangups stand, war 1784 auf Befehl der Katharina II in Sewastopol unbenannt zur Erinnerung an das ersten Jahrhunderten). In this city, Remy visits the graves of Russian military figures. These are the graves of Kornilov, Istomin, Rakhimov, Lazarev (Admirale Kornilow, Lasrew).

Inkerman. The object of the name is the city of Inkerman. Remy himself notes that it would be more correct, from his point of view, to write and pronounce with the letter j: richtiger Inkjerman [14].

Bagtschi-Sarai / Perle der Krim / Gartenpallast. The object of the name is Bakhchisarai. Unlike Yevpatoria, this city made a much stronger impression on the traveler. Franz Remy calls it the "pearl of the Crimea" (Perle der Krim). The traveler stops at the gostiny dvor called "Khan-Sarai" (Gasthaus "Chan-Sarai"). The author liked the hospitality of the Crimean Tatars in this city. Remy also notes that some of them speak Russian well, and many speak fluently. Franz Remy, like P.S. Pallas, adapts the toponym Bakhchisarai for the German–speaking reader - "Garten Pallast". In the city, the author observes the evening prayer of the Crimean Tatars, which also makes a great impression on the author. When describing in detail the process of prayer, one can find such realities as: Mullah (Mullah) – an Islamic cleric, an expert in the Koran, as well as headdresses that the author observed among residents of the city of Bakhchisarai – turban for men and Fez for women [14, p. 55].

Alupka. The object of the name is the city of Alupka. Visiting Alupka, Franz Remy notes that the city has become very famous in Russia.

Jalta. The object of the name is the city of Yalta. In this city, Remy celebrates the beautiful panorama (Ein wundervolles Panorama).

Sympheropol. The object of the name is the city of Simferopol. The author also mentions Ak Mosque (Ak–Metschet, Wei-e Kirche) under both the first and second variants. Describing the city, Franz Remy emphasizes that part of the city looks modern, "European", and part does not. At the same time, it indicates an unfavorable distribution of space in the city (Platzverschwendung) [14, p. 183].

Karassubasar. The object of the name is the city of Belogorsk. Having visited this city, Remy notes that after his visit to Bakhchisarai, this city cannot significantly surprise, but emphasizes the large number of religious institutions – 23 mosques, 5 churches, 4 synagogues.

Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe. The object of the name is the city of Feodosia. Many names of the city of Feodosia can be found in the author's work. This is Theodosia, which the author translates as "the gift of God" (Gottesgabe), old Tavria (alte Taurien), as well as "the city of the seven gods" (Stadt der Sieben G ? tten). In the travelogue, the author describes the former greatness of this city and notes the spelling of its name in Turkish – Kefe [14, p. 196].

Hydronyms

Schlammb?dervonSaki. The object of the name is the mud lakes of the city of Saki. The traveler emphasizes the benefits of mud baths, which he visits in the western part of Crimea. According to him, they help with rheumatism, migraines, anthrax and so on (Rheumatismen, Megren, Milz un.s.w.) [14, p. 18].

Urbanonyms

Laufchanbasar. The reality also includes the port market (Hafenmarkt) on the southern coast of Crimea with the name "Laufchan bazaar", where the author really liked the fruits sold there.

Visiting Karasubazar, Franz Remy talks about the Crimean Tatar language and writes that the Crimean Tatar language is a dialect of Turkish, which is well understood in Constantinople. The peculiarity of this dialect is the frequent stress on the last syllable and in Bakhchisarai it sounds softer than, for example, in Karasubazar. It acquires the most gentle sound in female names such as: Anife, Urie, Ulife and so on. (Die Tatarische Sprache ist ein Dialekt des T?rkischen, der in Konstantinopol vollkommen verstanden wird. Sie hat den Accent fast auf dem stets Vokal der letzten Silbe, klingt in Bachstisarai, weicher als in z.B. Karassu-Basar, am weichten Jedoch im Munde des weiblichen Geschlechts, dessen Name – Anife, Urie, Gaineb, Gulsum u.s.w., das Ohr angenehm ber?hren.) [14, c. 147].

As for the temporal characteristics of the realities of the peninsula described by Remy, some of the realities were relevant at the time of the author's visit to the peninsula. These are all variations of the name of the city of Feodosia (Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe), Simferopol (Akmetsched).

The results of the analysis of the time parameter of the realities of Remy's travelogue are reflected in Table 1.:

Table 1

Temporary types of realities in Remy's work

The reality that is relevant until the creation of the travelogue

The realities relevant at the time of creation of the travelogue

Realities that are currently missing

1

 Gelim Ghirei Chan

 

78

6

Koslow, Geslew

Kaffa, Keffe, Stadt der Sieben G?tten, alte Taurien, etc.

The reality that is relevant until the creation of the travelogue. Remy's work mentions three historical realities-astyonyms. These are the former names of the straits of the Greek origin. In this case, the naming object has been preserved, but the reality has changed-the word (L-reality) [2].

          A reality that is currently missing. In this case, we can talk about such a form as:

          - the naming object was preserved, but was renamed: Kaffa, (today Feodosia), Karassubasar (today Belogorsk), Akmetsched (today Simferopol), etc.;

Among other features of writing realities, we note the following cases:

- the use of doublet names: Eupatoria / Koslow / Geslew, where Kozlov is the old Russian name of Yevpatoria, an adaptation of the Crimean Tatar Geslew; Sympheropol / Akmetschet / Wei-e Kirche, where Wei- e Kirche is an adaptation of the Crimean Tatar word into German; Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe / Stadt der Sieben G ? tten / alte Taurien, where Gottesgabe is an adaptation of a Greek word into German.

Remy's travelogue mainly contains descriptions of the peoples of the Crimea, as well as Crimean cities of the XIX century, quite often we find subjective assessments of the author.

Conclusions

In the travelogue F. Remy, we observe 7 classes of reality words. These are primarily oikonyms, hydronyms, oronyms, urbanonyms, burials, personalities and ethnographic realities. The most extensive group is occupied by toponyms (58 units). The total number of identified realities is 85 units. Quite often, we see several names of the city mentioned in the names, which is typical of Crimea. For example, Eupatoria / Koslow / Geslew, where Kozlov is the old Russian name of Yevpatoria, an adaptation of the Crimean Tatar Geslew; Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe / Stadt der Sieben G?tten / alte Taurien, where Gottesgabe is an adaptation of a Greek word into German.

Based on the results of the analysis, the most characteristic realities for the Crimea of the sample of the XIX century are the realities–astyonyms, including doublets, which is associated with the ethnic diversity of the Crimea, as well as with the rich history of the peninsula.

In addition to the names of cities, the names of hotels, clothes, measures, military realities, proper names were found in the travelogue, but in smaller numbers.

Some of the realities were relevant at the time of the author's trip to the Crimea, but today they have changed their name. For example, these are all variations of the name of the city of Feodosia (Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe).

Sometimes a traveler tries to explain the etymology of the word. F. Remy also faces communication difficulties due to cultural differences.  In addition to the astyonyms, the author finds noteworthy coffee houses that are absent in his homeland, quite often we find subjective assessments of the author. 

References
1. Abich,  H. (1865). Einleitende Grundzüge der Geologie Halbinsel Kertsch und Taman [Introductory principles of the geology of the Kerch and Taman peninsula] In. St. Petersburg: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
2.  Chaney, E. (2000). The Evolution of the Grand Tour: Anglo-Italian Cultural Relations since the Renaissance. 2nd ed. – Oxon; New York: Routledge.  
3.  Chernov, G.V. (1958). Issues of translating Russian non-equivalent vocabulary (Soviet realities) into English: based on the material of translations of Soviet journalism.
4.  Kretov, A.A., & Fenenko N.A. (2013). Linguistic theory of realities In. Voronezh: Vestnik VGU. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 1, 7-13.
5.  Maiga, A.A. (2016). Africa in French and Russian travelogues. Saint-Petersburg.
6.  Mead, W. E. (1914). The Grand Tour in the Eighteenth Century. Boston; New York: Houghton Mufflin Co.
7. Pallas, P.S. (1801). Bemerkungen auf einer Reise in die südlichen Statthalterschaften des russischen Reichs in den Jahren 1793 und 1794 [Remarks on a trip to the southern governorships of the Russian Empire in the years 1793 and 1794]. Leipzig: Martini.
8. Ponomarev, E.R. (2017). On the question of the general theory of travelogue Medialinguistics. Vol. 6. Language in mass media coordinates. Materials of the II international scientific and practical conference. July 2 – July 6, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 150-152.
9. Remy, F. (1872). Die Krim in ethnographischer, landschaftlicher und hisgienischer Beziehung [Ñrimea in ethnographic, landscape and historical terms. A traveling companion for the large traveling public] In. Dem gronszen reisenden Publikum ein Wandergefahrte. – Odessa; Leipzig: Emil, Berndt. 
10.  Rossels, V. R. (1955). Translation and the national originality of the original Questions of literary translation.
11.  Shpak, G.V. (2018). Representation of images of time and space in European travelogue of the 17th-18th centuries
12.  Sobolev, L.N. (1952). A manual on translation from Russian into French. Moscow: Publishing house. lit. to foreign lang. 
13.  Tomakhin, G.D. (1988). Realities – Americanisms. A manual on regional studies
14.  Vlahov, S. & S. I. Florin (1980). Untranslatable in translation. Moscow: “International Relations”. 

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The reviewed article "Crimean realities in travelogue by F. Remy "Crimea in ethnographic, geographical and historical terms" (1872)", proposed for publication in the journal Philology: Scientific Research, is undoubtedly relevant due to the fact that modern developments in linguistic and cultural studies help to interpret the facts reflected in travelogues in a new way. Undoubtedly, changes in society, the popularity of social networks, blogs and vlogs, as well as TV shows that talk about travel, and the availability of trips have changed the public consciousness today. However, the genre of travelogues about new lands was known several centuries ago. So, the author focuses his attention on travelogues within the framework of this article. In addition, localization is of interest - the author focuses on the Crimean peninsula and its descriptions in the works of German-speaking travelers. Note that the author does not provide accurate data on the corpus taken for the study. The presented article is made in line with modern scientific approaches, the work consists of an introduction containing the formulation of the problem, the main part, as well as a research one with an empirical base. It is worth noting that the article does not contain the theoretical basis of the study in the introductory part. Thus, the author does not pay attention to the historiography of the issue, the theoretical foundations of the work, does not refer to the works of his predecessors, which does not allow to fully identify the increment of scientific knowledge within the framework of the reviewed article and highlight scientific gaps. In the main part, there is no indication of the methodology and progress of the study. Since there are no clearly defined tasks in the introductory part, it is impossible to evaluate the conclusion for its compliance with the original task. The article requires an increase in volume, since the volume of characters with spaces is slightly more than 6,000 when, according to the requirements of the publisher, the article should be from 12,000 (See requirements https://nbpublish.com/fmag/info_106.html ) The bibliography of the article contains 9 sources in Russian and foreign languages. However, the author did not turn to fundamental works such as monographs, PhD and doctoral dissertations, which were defended sufficiently on related research topics. Technically, when making a bibliographic list, the generally accepted requirements of GOST are violated, namely, non-compliance with the alphabetical principle of registration of sources. The article will undoubtedly be useful to a wide range of people: philologists, literary critics, undergraduates and graduate students of specialized universities. In general, it should be noted that the article is written in a simple language understandable to the reader, well structured, typos, spelling and syntactic errors, inaccuracies were not found. The general impression of acquaintance with the article "Crimean realities in travelogue F. Remy "Crimea in ethnographic, geographical and historical terms" (1872) "is positive, but the article requires edits, namely; 1) an increase in the volume of work, 2) strengthening the bibliography and bringing it into line with the requirements of GOST, 3) reworking the introduction of the article taking into account the reference to the historiography of the declared topic and a clear statement of tasks, correlating with the conclusion. A second review is required after completion.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The benchmark for assessing realities in literary, artistic, and journalistic texts is not a new phenomenon. In such research, the author seeks to catalog the nominations, to give them a certain systemic character. In my opinion, the peer-reviewed work is a similar outrage. But this is quite a successful methodological approach, because when analyzing language / linguistic phenomena, this specificity is necessary. The text of the work has a completed form, the main purpose of the study has been achieved, it seems that the set number of tasks has also been solved. The main source of analysis is F. Travelogue. Remy "Crimea in ethnographic, geographical and historical terms" (1872). The choice, I think, is not accidental, and the source has not been subjected to such an assessment so often. The author does not exclude the so-called theoretical and practical references in the course of his work: for example, "for the practical analysis of data on Crimea compiled by a German traveler, it is important to define the concepts of "reality" and "travelogue" and establish its types in the work under study. The concept of "reality" in Russian literature has been analyzed by various authors," etc. They are undoubtedly necessary, because they lead a potential reader along a strictly defined route. Citations in the text are given fully, holistically, the formal grade is sustained: for example, "L. N. Sobolev presents realities as "... words from national life that do not exist in other languages, because these objects and phenomena do not exist in other countries." [6; 38]. Related concepts for the term "travelogue" are such as "travel notes" or "travel notes". For the first time, Burton Holmes uses this term to describe the performances, which are narrated about the travels he has done. In the XX century, the concept of travelogue was more well–established - "Travel report: a book, article, or film describing the places that people have visited and what they have encountered," etc. A systematic set of realities in the text of F. Remy is aimed at oikonyms, comonyms (hydronyms, oronyms...), astyonyms, etc. In my opinion, the fullness of the assessment is beyond doubt. Descriptions are also given in volume: for example, "Laufchanbasar. The reality also includes the port market (Hafenmarkt) on the southern coast of Crimea with the name "Laufchan bazaar", where the author really liked the fruits sold there. Visiting Karasubazar, Franz Remy talks about the Crimean Tatar language and writes that the Crimean Tatar language is a dialect of Turkish, which is well understood in Constantinople. The peculiarity of this dialect is the frequent stress on the last syllable and in Bakhchisarai it sounds softer than, for example, in Karasubazar. It acquires the most gentle sound in female names such as: Anife, Urie, Ulife and so on. (Die Tatarische Sprache ist ein Dialekt des T?rkischen, der in Konstantinopol vollkommen verstanden wird. Sie hat den Accent fast auf dem stets Vokal der letzten Silbe, klingt in Bachstisarai, weicher als in z.B. Karassu-Basar, am weichten Jedoch im Munde des weiblichen Geschlechts, dessen Name – Anife, Urie, Gaineb, Gulsum U.S.w., das Ohr angenehm ber?hren.)" etc . The data obtained are summarized in the form of a table, the visual format is quite convenient in linguistic research. The work is independent, original, and the practical nature of the material is obvious. Preliminary results are significant in the final block: "among other features of writing realities, we note the following cases: - the use of doublet names: Eupatoria / Koslow / Geslew, where Kozlov is the old Russian name of Yevpatoria, an adaptation of the Crimean Tatar Geslew; Sympheropol / Ak–metschet / Wei?e Kirche, where Wei?e Kirche is an adaptation of the Crimean Tatar word into German; Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe / Stadt der Sieben G?tten / alte Taurien, where Gottesgabe is an adaptation of a Greek word into German. Remy's travelogue mainly contains descriptions of the peoples of the Crimea, as well as Crimean cities of the XIX century, quite often we find subjective assessments of the author." Actually, the conclusion itself is in tune with the main part: "in addition to the names of cities, the names of hotels, clothes, measures, military realities, proper names were found in the travelogue, but in smaller numbers. Some of the realities were relevant at the time of the author's trip to the Crimea, but today they have changed their name. For example, these are all variations of the name of the city of Feodosia (Theodosia / Gottesgabe / Kaffa / Keffe). Sometimes a traveler tries to explain the etymology of the word. F. Remy also faces communication difficulties due to cultural differences. In addition to the astyonyms, the author finds noteworthy coffee houses that are absent in his homeland, quite often we find subjective assessments of the author." The list of sources is entered into the text of the article properly; the style of the essay corresponds to the actual scientific type. I recommend the article "Crimean realities in travelogue F. Remy "Crimea in ethnographic, geographical and historical terms" (1872)" for publication in the journal "Philology: Scientific research".