Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

A Study on the Inheritance and Protection Mechanism of Chinese Handicraft Intangible Cultural Heritage

Van Syaosi

ORCID: 0009-0002-6652-5582

Teacher, Department of Russian, South China Business College of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (China)

181 Liangtian Str., Guangzhou, China, 510545

202273@gwng.edu.cn

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2023.12.69097

EDN:

PDDILA

Received:

24-11-2023


Published:

18-01-2024


Abstract: This paper takes the intangible cultural heritage of Chinese handicrafts as the object of study, aiming to deeply explore the mechanism of its inheritance and protection. The intangible cultural heritage of handicrafts refers to traditional artefacts and handicraft products created through craftsmanship, as well as the knowledge, skills and cultural expressions associated with them. Such heritage is not only a collection of tangible products, but also intangible cultural expressions rich in history, culture, skills and philosophy. They often represent the history, tradition and identity of a culture. Chinese handicrafts have a rich history and contain many cultural connotations and historical values. Each craft holds deep cultural traditions and unique regional characteristics. The innovation of the article is that it proposes a diversified protection framework, stresses the synergy of government, market and society, and analyses the lessons learned in combination with specific cases. It is found that although China's intangible cultural heritage of handicrafts faces many challenges, such as the impact of industrialization, the transformation of the market economy, and the loss of talents in traditional skills, its inheritance and preservation can be effectively promoted through measures such as improving laws and regulations, strengthening public education, and promoting social participation. The article ultimately calls for the construction of an inclusive protection mechanism to achieve the sustainable development of China's handicraft-based intangible cultural heritage. (This article is the result of the project "Mutual learning of strategies for preservation and transmission of intangible cultural heritage of Russia and China in the field of handicrafts".)


Keywords:

Intangible Cultural Heritage, handicrafts, China, heritage, protection, cultural protection mechanisms, cultural diversity, social participation, skill inheritors, tradition and modernity

This article is automatically translated.

Since the end of the twentieth century, under the strong influence of economic globalization and modernization of public life, the rich and diverse intangible cultural heritage (ICH) created by various peoples of mankind throughout history has been experiencing an increasingly serious crisis, and the protection and salvation of this heritage is becoming one of the most important tasks facing Governments and peoples of the world today. That is why, on October 17, 2003, UNESCO launched the implementation of the "Convention on the Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage" (hereinafter – the "Convention on Protection").

Thirteen Chinese crafts are included in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Mankind, and four are on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Protection, including Chinese shadows, traditional xuanzhi papermaking techniques (from pteroceltis bark, rice straw, bamboo for painting and calligraphy) and Chinese paper cut–out drawing. In addition, there are many competent embroiderers in China, whose ability to embroider in the past was embodied in traditional objects. These items gradually went out of fashion as people's living standards increased and their lifestyle changed [8, p. 2]. In this regard, the skill of folk embroidery is no longer appreciated and practiced as widely as in the past, and is gradually declining. A similar sad fate overtook many other valuable cultural heritage of folk crafts – window decoration made of paper clippings, New Year's pictures "Nianhua", wood carving, etc.

The Chinese nation has always had excellent traditions of preserving intangible cultural heritage: from the collection, comparison and transfer of the ancient "Shijing" (one of the oldest monuments of Chinese literature) before the collection and preservation of ethnic, folk and folklore cultures that arose at the beginning of the last century, and, in particular, achievements in the field of folklore studies. Since the formation of the new China, and especially since the new period of reform and openness, China has done a lot of work in the field of preserving intangible cultural heritage, conducted positive exploration and accumulated useful experience. Next, using specific examples, we will consider the intangible cultural heritage of crafts, analyze it from the point of view of building inheritance and protection mechanisms, and then draw some conclusions.

Formation of transmission and preservation mechanisms

The essence of protection is to maintain and strengthen the inner life of a cultural object, increase its ability to "sustainable development" [5, p. 105], which is based on a correct understanding of the definition and characteristics of intangible cultural heritage and considers it as a living and active existence. The formation and implementation of the state cultural policy directly and directly affect the distribution and use of intangible cultural resources and directly determine the effectiveness of the preservation of cultural heritage [14, p. 84]. At the same time, the process of cultural protection should not turn into a process of cultural monopoly, and the protection of intangible cultural heritage within groups, regions and nationalities should become the common rights and obligations of all groups, regions and nationalities that jointly create and share this culture [8, p. 34]. Attention should be paid to the changing relationship between the living heritage of crafts and industrial preservation [16, p. 195], while industrial preservation should keep up with the times and find such forms of scientific research and production that would correspond to the development of industrial structure, technology and design.

In November 2003, the Committee on Education, Culture and Health of the National People's Congress (NPC) developed a draft Law of the People's Republic of China (PRC) "On the Protection of Traditional Culture of Nationalities and Nationalities of the People's Republic of China"; in 2004, China joined the UN Convention on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage, becoming one of the countries that ratified the accession to The Convention is at an early stage, and bringing the protection of China's intangible cultural heritage in line with international standards. In connection with these events, the Committee of the National People's Congress for UNESCO Affairs changed the name of the draft law of the People's Republic of China "On the Protection of Traditional Culture of Nationalities and Nationalities" to "On the protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage" and created a special group to coordinate actions with all parties in order to accelerate the adoption of this bill.

In 2005, the views of the Main Office of the State Council on strengthening the protection of China's intangible cultural heritage introduced the concept of "intangible cultural heritage" into the system of policy expression for the first time, which became a program provision that brought the expression of intangible cultural heritage in line with international standards and unified with domestic standards. In 2011, in connection with the adoption and enactment of the Law of the People's Republic of China "On Intangible Cultural Heritage", changes and improvements were made to existing norms and rules, as well as the legislative status of the protection of intangible cultural heritage was established. In 2017, at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), the report on strengthening cultural awareness included "strengthening the protection and use of cultural relics, protection and inheritance of cultural heritage." The protection of intangible cultural heritage has become an important component of strengthening cultural awareness, as well as an important component of strengthening trust in culture. Based on the basic principle of "government leadership and public participation" in the protection of intangible cultural heritage in China, policies and regulations for the protection of intangible cultural heritage issued by the Government have become an important means and channel for managing the protection of intangible cultural heritage by the State. In order to build a strong socialist cultural power, a comprehensive, systematic and in-depth analysis of the features of the evolution of China's intangible cultural heritage protection policy and the internal logic of its development is of great practical importance, which will allow us to develop practical recommendations for the development of a policy for the protection of intangible cultural heritage and its implementation.

Based on the analysis of the methods of protection in the period from 2000 to 2021, the process of protecting China's intangible cultural heritage passed through three stages: the period of origin, characterized by study, borrowing and research, in which rescue protection prevailed; the period of growth and development, in which there is a relative balance of the three methods of protection in order to consolidate the results achieved; and the period of development and maturity, in which productive protection and continuous improvement of holistic protection prevail, taking into account the concept of "sustainable development". In the period of development and maturity, in which the concept of "sustainable development" is adhered to, productive protection dominates and holistic protection is constantly improved, the evolutionary characteristics of the "hierarchical development and continuous maturity" of methods of protecting China's intangible cultural heritage are formed and the transition from "basic protection" to "protection in the process of development" is embodied. This reflects the internal logic of the transition from "basic protection" to "protection in the process of development", and protection in the process of development is gradually becoming the focus of public policy [13, p. 70].

In August 2022, the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China issued the "14th five-year Cultural Development Plan", which additionally proposes measures to "strengthen the protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage", namely: "Improve the system of studying and registering intangible cultural heritage, the system of representative projects, the system of identification and management of representative heirs. To improve the system of studying and accounting for intangible cultural heritage, the system of representative projects, the system of identifying and managing representative transmitters, to carry out dynamic management of representative projects of national intangible cultural heritage, to explore the possibilities of identifying representative groups of transmitters, to strengthen the training of transmitters of intangible cultural heritage, to improve the effectiveness of the practice of transmitting intangible cultural heritage. Strengthening of general systematic protection, creation of national cultural ecological reserves, villages, towns and microdistricts representing intangible cultural heritage. Strengthening integration into production and life, innovative activities for thematic dissemination, promotion of intangible cultural heritage in schools, communities and networks" [17]. On October 30, 2022, at the thirty-seventh meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of the Thirteenth convocation, the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of the Yellow River" was adopted, which pays special attention to strengthening the intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin [2]. Thus, it can be stated that China contributes to the improvement of the intangible cultural heritage protection system on an ongoing basis.

A specific example

Considering the tourist opportunities of Dali and Lijiang in Yunnan Province, as well as the spiritual needs of modern wealthy citizens in preserving the value, added value and original embodiment of precious metals such as gold, silver and precious stones, great efforts have been made in Xinhua Village of Heqing County, Yunnan Province to develop silver craft in the context of tourism development, which has brought good economic benefits. Traditional crafts, as an important area of intangible cultural heritage contributing to rural regeneration and poverty reduction, have long been widely discussed. In addition to the discussion on inheritance, innovation and the mechanism of production of traditional crafts, Gao Li et al. It is claimed that the anti-poverty workshop has formed a special combined mode of production due to social integration and cascading effects [3, p. 57]. Ma Zhiyao and Wang Leiying propose an ecosystem–based practical way to combat poverty, based on the protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage, promoting multilateral cooperation and synergetic development, in which heirs are the main figure, and products of intangible cultural heritage are the basis [10, p. 160]. Wang Xueli and Peng Huaixue also considered the mechanisms of using intangible cultural heritage in the fight against poverty [15, pp. 71-72].

As part of the intangible cultural heritage training program conducted by one of the Chinese universities, advanced practitioners were invited to conduct practical classes with the heirs, who clearly showed how to create a brand, how to organize live broadcasts and other necessary skills, and the assessment was positive. One of the heirs, who shows an increased interest in the market, but hardly keeps up with the times, took such modern courses to make up for the shortcomings in his knowledge, after training, he used the acquired competencies for active network communication, demonstrating the skill of pumpkin carving, pumpkin works for sale, attracting a lot of attention the number of fans and extracting economic benefits. In the protection of intangible culture, inheritance is the core, and the protection of heirs is one of the aspects of the inheritance mechanism [11, p. 122]. The training of the heirs' abilities and the education of innovative consciousness cannot be separated from systematic learning and the exchange of experience. The training program for groups of heirs of China's intangible cultural heritage is an important initiative put forward in the "Outline of the Cultural Development and Reform Plan for the thirteenth five–year period", which is designed to help heirs of intangible cultural heritage improve their cultural and artistic skills and improve the quality of their work. The program is aimed at helping people who have inherited intangible cultural heritage to improve their cultural and artistic literacy, aesthetic abilities and creative potential.

Jiaojiang district of Taizhou City has a rich intangible cultural heritage of crafts, including Taizhou embroidery, Taizhou glass carving technique, Zhanan paper carving, glass carving, brush making technique, etc. In 2004, Taizhou City began to protect the intangible cultural heritage: fully giving preference to centuries-old streets and ancient buildings; relying on them, The city conducts activities to promote the culture of the NCH and the inheritance of the skills of the NCH; the integration of the culture of the NCH into school education has improved the understanding of the culture of the NCH among youth groups and achieved good results in the field of cultural inheritance [1, p. 165]. For example, in the Jiaojiang district of Taizhou City, the Taizhou Embroidery Art Museum was established, which became a good platform for inheriting folk art and created a favorable atmosphere for its protection. An exhibition on a literary theme in 2022, showcasing the art of tea drinking, embroidery and flower arranging, attracts a large number of tourists and turns into a popular attraction. With the continuous development of the Internet, new media has brought convenience and speed of exchange to people's lives. With advantages such as fast distribution speed, wide reach and high interactivity, new media have had a great impact on traditional crafts, as well as brought new opportunities and new ideas due to proximity to students, integration of modern elements and living inheritance [7, p. 105]. On new media platforms, Taizhou embroidery makes full use of social platforms such as TikTok, Xiaohongshu and Bilibili to conduct an advertising campaign; TikTok videos, Xiaohongshu diaries and a series of promotional videos on Bilibili on the theme "Mountains and Seas for you" show the perfect combination of traditional embroidery and modern aesthetics. In addition, educational videos on the TikTok platform on Zhang'an paper clippings, as well as on making paper lanterns, attracted widespread attention and allowed more people to understand the features and uniqueness of Zhang'an clippings.

In the future, when protecting and transferring intangible cultural heritage, it is important to continue to improve the development of appropriate protective laws and regulations; improve the protection mechanism with the participation of the government, the market and society; cultivate and train talents in the field of traditional crafts; raise public awareness of developments in this field and the importance of intangible cultural heritage of crafts.

In addition, short videos with such communicative characteristics as high transmission speed and high interactivity, as well as the ability to create and distribute in real time, are becoming an important means of distributing and popularizing intangible cultural heritage. According to the statistical analysis of the TikTok data report for 2021, the level of coverage of national ICH projects on TikTok is 99.42%, and the number of relevant videos increased by 149% over the same period compared to the same period [6, p. 68].

TikTok and Kwai, as super popular video platforms, in an effort to increase the attractiveness of content about intangible cultural heritage, have initiated programs such as "Partners of Intangible Cultural Heritage", "Journey on the Internet of Intangible Cultural Heritage", "Leaders of Intangible Cultural Heritage", etc. in order to find heirs of intangible cultural heritage and encourage distributors, to provide comprehensive assistance in the protection and development of the ICH from two points of view – cultural heritage and dissemination of content. NCH videos can also be combined with multiple social media, and content can be created twice according to different platforms like TikTok, Kwai, Weibo, etc. to expand the influence of NCH brands using a multiplatform matrix. In the context of new media, the development of online video broadcasting has increased the three-dimensional dissemination of information, and live video broadcasting has led to an expansion of the range of branded NCH videos, strengthening the relationship between the subject of distribution and users, and the formation of closer and stronger user relationships for branded NCH videos on various media platforms.

Conclusions

In general, China has made significant progress in the preservation, transfer and development of intangible cultural heritage based on handicraft work. The efforts of the Chinese Government and all sectors of society to preserve ICH are commendable, not only in terms of improving laws and regulations and strengthening political support, but also in terms of significantly raising awareness of public participation and effectively creating a variety of protection mechanisms. We are confident that in the future, China's valuable cultural heritage will be better preserved and developed, and the Chinese experience in this area will serve as an experience for other countries for managerial borrowing.

References
1. Chen, Honghui (2023). 非物质文化遗产保护与中国传统文化传承探讨[Discussion on the protection of intangible cultural heritage and the inheritance of traditional Chinese culture]. Heritage Identification and Appreciation, 14, 162-165.
2. Thirty-seventh Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Thirteenth National People's Congress: Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of the Yellow River. Issue Date: 2022 30th October, 2022. Retrieved from http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202210/1af57adb03f54fd7821e7d35efe6ca15.shtml
3. Gao, Li & Wang, Jingxin & Niu, Le (2022). 高莉、王京鑫、牛乐. 乡村振兴背景下的妇女手工艺生产 – – 临夏州东乡县刺绣扶贫车间调查研究[Women's Handicraft Production in the Context of Rural Revitalisation-A Survey Study of the Embroidery Poverty Alleviation Workshop in Dongxiang County]. Linxia Prefecture. Journal of Qinghai University for Nationalities (Social Science Edition), 48(01), 51-57.
4. Guo, Ping & Zhang, Jie (2023). 中国非物质文化遗产研究2022年度报告[China's Intangible Cultural Heritage Research 2022 Annual Report]. Folk Culture Forum, 03, 92-101.
5. He, Xuejun (2005). 关于非物质文化遗产保护的理论思考[Theoretical reflections on the protection of intangible cultural heritage]. Jiangxi Social Science, 02, 103-109.
6. Li, Xufeng & Fan, Chuanguo (2018). 非物质文化遗产短视频的品牌化传播研究[Branding communication research on short videos of intangible cultural heritage]. Media, 07, 68-70.
7. Liu, Chang (2018). 新媒体对非物质文化遗产传承的影响 – – 以南京民俗博物馆的传统手工艺保护项目为例[The impact of new media on the inheritance of intangible cultural heritage-an example of the traditional handicraft protection project of Nanjing Folk Museum]. Social Scientist, 05, 103-107.
8. Liu, Kui Li (2004). 非物质文化遗产及其保护的整体性原则[Integral principle of intangible cultural heritage and its protection].Journal of Guangxi Normal College, 04, 1-8.
9. Liu, Kui Li (2007). 论全球化背景下的中国非物质文化遗产保护[On the protection of China's intangible cultural heritage in the context of globalisation]. Henan Social Science, 01, 25-34.
10. Ma, Zhiyao & Wang & Leying (2022). “非物质文化遗产”扶贫可持续生态系统的构建策略 – – 以传统手工艺类“非物质文化遗产”为例[Strategies for building a sustainable ecosystem for poverty alleviation of "intangible cultural heritage"--The example of "intangible cultural heritage" of traditional handicrafts]. Ethnic Arts Research]. Research on Ethnic Arts, 03, 153-160.
11. Qi, Qingfu (2006). 论非物质文化遗产保护中的传承及传承人[On the Inheritance and Inheritors in the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage]. Northwest Ethnic Studies, 03, 114-123.
12. Sun, Hua & Shu, Yan (2023). 非物质文化遗产保护政策对纺织手工艺的传承发展研究 – – 评《中国纺织类非物质文化遗产概论》[Research on the Inheritance and Development of Textile Crafts by Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection Policies--A Review of Introduction to Chinese Textile Intangible Cultural Heritage, Wool Textile Science and Technology]. Wool Textile Science and Technology, 51(04), 133-134.
13. Tan, Guoxin & Wang, Yahui & Wu, Xiaolin & Wang, Xueding & Xu, Lianlian (2023). 中国非物质文化遗产保护政策演进与内在逻辑[Evolution and internal logic of China's intangible cultural heritage protection policy]. Journal of Hubei Institute of Technology (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 40(05), 61-73.
14. Wang, Wenzhang & Chen, Feilong (2008). 非物质文化遗产保护与国家文化发展战略[Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection and National Cultural Development Strategy]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 281-89.
15. Wang, Xueli & Peng, Huaixue (2022). “后扶贫时代”非物质文化遗产助力精准扶贫:耦合机理与优化建议[Intangible cultural heritage for poverty alleviation in the "post-poor era": coupling mechanism and optimisation proposal]. Agricultural Economics, 06, 70-73.
16. Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Jie (2019). 基于天津非物质文化遗产活态传承下的传统手工艺生产性保护研究[Research on the productive protection of traditional handicrafts under the living heritage of intangible cultural heritage based on Tianjin]. Packaging Engineering, 40(04), 192-196.
17. Issued by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council: "14th Five-Year Plan for Cultural Development". Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2022-08/16/content_5705612.htm

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for publication in the journal Culture and Art, as indicated in the title ("Analysis of the mechanism for protecting the intangible cultural heritage of crafts in China") is the mechanism for protecting the intangible cultural heritage of crafts in China. Revealing the subject of the study in the text of the article, the author explains that the mechanism for the protection of intangible cultural heritage extends in China not only to thirteen crafts included in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Mankind, and four included in the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in need of urgent protection, but to the whole set of traditional crafts and folk crafts of China, which are going out of fashion due to the change of the traditional way of life by new social realities and economic relations. According to the author, the basis of the mechanism under consideration is the traditions of preserving intangible cultural heritage rooted in Chinese culture ("The Chinese nation has always had excellent traditions of preserving intangible cultural heritage...", "Since the formation of new China and especially since the new period of reforms and openness, China has done a lot of work to preserve intangible cultural heritage, conducted positive exploration and accumulated a useful experience"). Based on the theoretical reflections of He Xuezun, the author explains to the reader that the essence of protecting the intangible cultural heritage in modern China is to maintain and strengthen its (heritage) inner life, to increase its ability to "sustainable development". In the context of a brief review of the works of Chinese scientists, the author reveals the basic principles of the formation of a mechanism for the transfer and preservation of intangible cultural heritage, consisting of several factors: 1) China's state cultural policy affects the distribution and use of intangible cultural resources, determining the effectiveness of conservation; 2) the state cultural monopoly balances the principle of respect for the common rights and obligations of all social groups, regions and nationalities that jointly create and share culture (objects of protection of intangible cultural heritage); 3) due to the changing interconnection "between the living heritage of crafts and industrial preservation", the manufacturing sector ("industrial preservation") is responsible for conducting research and development work on the development of technologies, industrial structure, production and design in the context of the tasks of preserving the intangible cultural heritage. Further, the author draws the reader's attention to the role of the Government and the Chinese Communist Party in strategic planning, as well as in the ideological and legal support of the state doctrine of the preservation of intangible cultural heritage, which was adjusted taking into account China's ratification at an early stage of the UN Convention on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage, for which the Committee of the National People's Congress of China for UNESCO Affairs A special group has been set up to coordinate actions with all parties in order to speed up the process of adopting the necessary laws. The author notes the essential role of the ideological component of the state doctrine, expressed by the thesis that "for building a strong socialist cultural power, a comprehensive, systematic and in-depth analysis of the features of the evolution of the policy of protecting China's intangible cultural heritage and the internal logic of its development is of great practical importance." According to a number of Chinese theorists, the evolution of state cultural policy in the period from 2000 to 2021 went through a period of origin, a period of growth and development, and is currently undergoing a period of development and maturity, characterized by the logic of transition from "basic protection" to the doctrine of "protection in the process of development" and protection in the process of development is gradually becoming the center of attention politics. In particular, as the author notes, the evolution of the state doctrine is fixed by the "14th five-year plan for the Development of culture" adopted in August 2022 by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Using specific examples, the author demonstrates how doctrinal attitudes are implemented in the practices of preserving intangible cultural heritage, which cover socio-cultural rebranding of territories, tourism development, research work, education and professional development programs, various educational activities, including the use of a multiplatform matrix of social networks on the Internet. Thus, the subject of the study is disclosed by the author in a sufficiently comprehensive manner. The article is worthy of publication because it is of theoretical and practical interest. The research methodology corresponds to the value-normative approach of methodological support of cultural policy, which dominates in Russian cultural studies. The author traces the causal relationship of China's state cultural policy with the development of practices for the preservation of intangible cultural heritage by public institutions and various social groups in certain regions of the country, jointly creating and sharing socialist culture based on the doctrine of heritage protection in the development process. The logic of the research is based on a structural and functional analysis of the mechanism for protecting the intangible cultural heritage of crafts in China, which allowed the author to focus the reader's attention on positive experiences and give him an appropriate assessment in conclusion. The author reasonably justifies the relevance of the research topic by saying that "since the end of the twentieth century, under the strong influence of economic globalization and modernization of public life, the rich and diverse intangible cultural heritage created by various peoples of mankind throughout history has been experiencing an increasingly serious crisis, and the protection and salvation of this heritage are becoming one of the most important problems facing governments today and the peoples of the world." In this context, the reviewer notes that the positive experience of the formation and development of the mechanism for the protection of the intangible cultural heritage of crafts in China, disclosed by the author, is of theoretical and practical interest. The scientific novelty of the presented work lies, first of all, in the explication into the Russian theoretical discourse of information about the positive experience of China's cultural policy, supported by a brief overview of the works of Chinese theorists. The author has tried to maintain the scientific style of the text, but there are also significant shortcomings that require improvement: 1) the text requires literary proofreading by a native Russian speaker, since in some cases the author's thought is difficult to read (for example: "... a sad fate overtook many other valuable cultural heritage of folk crafts ...", "... from the collection, comparison and transmission of the ancient Shijing (one of the oldest monuments of Chinese literature) prior to the collection and preservation of ethnic, folk and folklore cultures that arose at the beginning of the last century, and, in particular, achievements in the field of folklore studies, all this contributed to the enrichment of the continuation of Chinese civilization", "China has done a lot of work to preserve the intangible cultural heritage, conducted positive exploration and accumulated useful experience", "... that based on a correct understanding of the definition and characteristics ...", etc.); 2) one of the norms of scientific style regulates the absence of punctuation marks after the subheadings highlighted in a separate line (it is necessary to remove the colon); 3) before using abbreviations (except for official abbreviations of state names) and abbreviations of terms, they must be fully prescribed, indicating in the abbreviated version in parentheses: for example, "intangible cultural heritage (ICH)", "Communist Party of China (CPC)", etc.; 4) it is not clear from the text whether the author means various software products under the names "TikTok", "TirTok", "TikTik", or accidentally made a mistake.
The structure of the article generally corresponds to the logic of the presentation of the results of scientific research, but in the content of the final conclusion, according to the reviewer, the judgment "The efforts of the Chinese government and all sectors of society to preserve ICH deserve praise ..." should be formulated differently, since the efforts of the Chinese government and all sectors of society to preserve ICH do not deserve "praise" (there is an obvious the connotation of arrogant judgment), and theoretical understanding for the further dissemination of positive experience in all the aspects listed below by the author. The bibliography as a whole reveals the subject field of the study well. The appeal to the opponents is quite sufficient and correct. After a little revision, the article will certainly arouse the interest of the readership of the magazine "Culture and Art".

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the journal Culture and Art, the author presented his article "Analysis of the mechanism for protecting the intangible cultural heritage of crafts in China", which conducted a study of the mechanisms and means of preserving and broadcasting cultural values in modern conditions. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the Chinese nation has always had excellent traditions of preserving intangible cultural heritage: from the collection, comparison and transmission of the ancient "Shijing" to the collection and preservation of ethnic, folk and folklore cultures that arose at the beginning of the last century, and, in particular, achievements in the field of folklore. The author notes that since the formation of the new China and especially since the new period of reform and openness, China has done a lot of work in the field of preserving intangible cultural heritage, conducted positive exploration and accumulated useful experience. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that thirteen Chinese crafts are included in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Mankind, and four are included in the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Protection, including Chinese shadows, traditional Xuanzhi papermaking technique and Chinese paper–cut drawing. The author's concerns are caused by the fact that there are many competent embroiderers in China, whose ability to embroider in the past was embodied in traditional objects. These items gradually went out of fashion as people's living standards improved and their lifestyle changed. In this regard, the skill of folk embroidery is no longer appreciated and practiced as widely as in the past, and is gradually declining. A similar sad fate has overtaken many other valuable cultural heritage of folk crafts. The methodological base represents an integrated approach containing general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as historical and socio-cultural analysis. Unfortunately, the author has not carried out an analysis of the scientific validity of the studied problem, which makes it difficult to make a conclusion about the scientific novelty of the study. The purpose of the study is to analyze the intangible cultural heritage and consider it on specific examples from the point of view of building inheritance and protection mechanisms. The author defines the essence of protection in maintaining and strengthening the inner life of a cultural object, increasing its ability to sustainable development, which is based on a correct understanding of the definition and characteristics of intangible cultural heritage and considers it as a living and active existence. The formation and implementation of the state cultural policy directly and directly affect the distribution and use of intangible cultural resources and directly determine the effectiveness of the preservation of intangible cultural heritage. At the same time, the author emphasizes that the process of cultural protection should not turn into a process of cultural monopoly, and the protection of intangible cultural heritage within groups, regions and nationalities should become the common rights and obligations of all groups, regions and nationalities that jointly create and share this culture. The author highly appreciates the role of the state in the formation of a mechanism for the preservation, transfer and development of intangible cultural heritage based on handicraft work. The efforts of the Chinese Government and all sectors of society to preserve sites are commendable, not only in terms of improving laws and regulations and strengthening political support, but also in terms of significantly raising awareness of public participation and effectively creating a variety of protection mechanisms. The training program for groups of heirs of China's intangible cultural heritage is an important initiative put forward in the "Outline of the Cultural Development and Reform Plan for the thirteenth five–year period", which is designed to help heirs of intangible cultural heritage improve their cultural and artistic skills and improve the quality of their work. The program is aimed at helping people who have inherited intangible cultural heritage to improve their cultural and artistic literacy, aesthetic abilities and creative potential. In the future, when protecting and transferring intangible cultural heritage, the author considers it important to continue to improve the development of appropriate protective laws and regulations; to improve the protection mechanism with the participation of the government, the market and society; to cultivate and train talents in the field of traditional crafts; to raise public awareness of events in this area and the importance of the intangible cultural heritage of crafts. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the material objects of the historical and cultural heritage of the regions of our country, their characteristic features, as well as the development of measures for their preservation is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. However, the bibliographic list of the study consists of 17 foreign sources, which seems sufficient for the generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the subject under study. The author fulfilled his goal, received certain scientific results that allowed him to summarize the material. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.