Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

Nilogov A.S. Decryption Methods From the Point of View of the Ontological Status of the Word/Antiword

Abstract: In his article Nilogov again raises a question about the ontological status of the word which he understands as the manner and the fashion in which a word exists in a natural language. The topic is being viewed from the point of view of the methodological grounds of the philosophy of antilanguage, a new discipline created at the confluence of linguistics and philosophy. As an example of the ontological status of the word, Nilogov uses decrypted linguistic instead of language units when analyzing ancient writings (Ancient Egyptian and Sumerian and etc.). These units are obtained as a result of application of particular methods and techniques aimed at reconstruction of ancient texts' interpretation. In the course of his research Nilogov has used antilanguage, hermeneutical, cryptophilological, linguistic methods, decryption, reconstruction, philological, heuristical and etymological methods. As a result of the research, decrypted language units are classified as antiwords that are usually used in a natural language but at the same time non-obviously refer to antilanguage. In particular, the author defines the following kinds of antiwords: decrypted antiwords (that denote hypothetically decrypted words as well as all words from dead written languages) and non-decrypted antiwords (that denote words from dead nonliterate languages). Nilogov divides all decrypted antiwords into the following subclasses: particular decrypted antiwords (conventional decrypted antiwords), cryptodecrypted antiwords and quasidecrypted antiwords (pseudodecrypted antiwords). 


Keywords:

ontological status of the decrypted antiword, decryption, Egyptology, Dyakonov, philosophy of antilanguage, Perepyolkin, egyptologism, decrypted antiword, antiword, Emelyanov


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bart R. Mifologii / Per. s frants., vstup. st. i komment. S. N. Zenkina. M., 1996.
2. Bulgakov S. N. Filosofiya imeni. Parizh, 1953.
3. Nilogov A. S. Filosofiya antiyazyka. SPb., 2013.
4. D'yakonov I. M. Tayny drevnikh pis'men. Problemy deshifrovki / Sbornik statey: sost., red., predisl. I. M. D'yakonova. M., 1976.
5. Drevneegipetskaya ieroglificheskaya pis'mennost'. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://www.refill.ru/egypt/scribe/hiero/1_4-5.htm (data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2015).
6. Perepelkin Yu. Ya. Perevorot Amen-khotpa IV. Chast' I. Kn. 1 i 2. M., 1967.
7. Perepelkin Yu. Ya. Chastnaya sobstvennost' v predstavlenii egiptyan Starogo tsarstva. M.–L., 1966.
8. Perepelkin Yu. Ya. Perevorot Amen-khotpa IV. Chast' II. M., 1984.
9. Vassoevich A. L. Redutsirovannye glasnye v egipetskom yazyke VII v. do n. e. (po assiriyskim klinopisnym peredacham egipetskikh imen sobstvennykh) // Vestnik drevney istorii. ¹ 3. 1983. S. 88–95.
10. Vassoevich A. L. K rekonstruktsii sistemy egipetskogo vokalizma (o reduktsii glasnykh v egipetskom yazyke VII veka do nashey ery) / Pis'mennye pamyatniki i problemy istorii kul'tury narodov Vostoka: XVI godichnaya nauchnaya sessiya LO IV AN SSSR (doklady i soobshcheniya). Ch. 1. M., 1982. S. 172–176.
11. Vassoevich A. L. K osnovam egipetskogo vokalizma // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1983. ¹ 4. S. 130–135.
12. Nilogov A. S. Antiyazykovaya nominatsiya bol'shikh chisel (V nachale bylo Chislo, i Chislo bylo u Boga, i Chislo bylo Bog) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 266–274.
13. Nilogov A. S. Antiyazyk kak yasnovidenie v besslovesnoy kommunikatsii D. G. Benneta // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2015. ¹ 1. S. 92–103.
14. Nilogov A. S. Splyu, sledovatel'no, sushchestvuyu // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2015. ¹ 4. S. 373–382.
15. Nilogov A. S. Psikhologiya i filosofiya antiyazyka (na materiale monografii I. A. Beskovoy «Priroda snovideniy») // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2015. ¹ 6. S. 588–601.
16. Derrida Zh. Pis'mo i razlichie / Per. s frants. D. Yu. Kralechkina, pod red. V. Yu. Kuznetsova. M., 2000.
17. Dekomb V. Sovremennaya frantsuzskaya filosofiya: [Sbornik]. / Perevod s frants. M. M. Fedorovoy M., 2000.
18. Ernshtedt P. V. Egipetskie zaimstvovaniya v grecheskom yazyke. M., 1953.
19. Kuz'mishchev V. A. Tayna zhretsov mayya. M., 1975. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://www.bibliotekar.ru/maya/36.htm (data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2015).
20. Kollektsiya lingvofrikov. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://lingvofreaks.livejournal.com (data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2015).
21. Burmistrovich Yu. Ya. Pozitsionnye smyagcheniya zadneyazychnykh soglasnykh v praslavyanskom yazyke // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2009. ¹ 5. S. 90–113.
22. Burmistrovich Yu. Ya. Istoricheskaya fonemologiya tsepi slavyanskikh yazykov, svyazannykh otnosheniyami ‘predok-potomok’, ot praindoevropeyskogo v litse ego protoslavyanskogo dialekta do russkogo: teoreticheskiy kurs: uch. pos. dlya studentov-filologov-rusistov vuzov. Abakan, 2008.
23. Chernykh P. Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: V 2 t. T. 1: A – Pantomima. M., 1999.
24. Zhivoy zhurnal V. V. Emel'yanova. [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://banshur69.livejournal.com/27737.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2015)