Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Gayvoronskaya, A. A. Psychosemantics of Extremism

Abstract: The author of the present research article makes an attempt to create theoretical grounds for the theory of extremism psychosemantics. Psychosemantics is the branch of psychology that studies the picture of the world of individuals and collective subjects. The phenomenon of extremism is usually associated with studies of the most important components of the system of values and meanings, attitudes and stereotypes that are common in different age and ethnic groups. The author makes an assumption that there is a certain psychological (semantic) structure of the phenomenon of extremism. This structure consists of different types of definitions and categorical structures that ‘classify’ this phenomenon and different forms of the phenomenon at different levels of interaction with a subject or a group. Psychosemantic methods that are used to study the phenomenon of extremism are usually aimed at reenactment of implicit personality theories describing this phenomenon. These methods allow to combine the definition of the studied phenomenon with other definitions and systems of definitions as well as to define and explain the most significant combinations and connections. The scientific important and novelty of the research is the assumption about the existence of the psychological (semantic) structure of extremism that can consist of different types of definitions and categorical structures that ‘classify’ this phenomenon. The author also offers the implicit model of extremism psychosemantics. Conclusions: psychosemantics of extremism allows a more profound research of the essential characteristics of the phenomenon of extremism, in particular, how systems of definitions are presented in different contexts and how they appear at the unconscious and conscious levels in respect to the phenomenon of extremism and forms of extremism.


Keywords:

psychosemantics, extremism, picture of the world, implicit personality theories, categorical structures, reconstruction, models, systems of definitions, classification methods, semantic space, mental map.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Z.U. Omarova, S.Z. Yakubova Religiozno-politicheskii ekstremizm: ideologiya protivodeistviya // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2011.-10.-C. 22-26.
2. A.A. Gaivoronskaya Ekstremizm kak ob''ekt sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-1.-C. 72-80.
3. S. V. Borisov Problemy formirovaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovykh ponyatii ekstremizma i prestuplenii ekstremistskoi napravlennosti* // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov.-2013.-2.-C. 54-59.
4. Stahelski, A. Terrorists Are Made, Not Born: Creating Terrorists Using Social Psychological Conditioning. Journal of Homeland Security, March 2004
5. Vasnetsova A.S. Vakhkhabizm v Rossii: kharakteristika, vzaimosvyaz' s terrorizmom i ekstremizmom, perspektivy gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-11.-C. 154-201. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.11.10185. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10185.html
6. Bruner J.S., Tagiuri R. The perception of people // Handbook of Social Psychology. N.J., 1954.
7. Tselikovskii, S.B. O psikhologicheskikh i ideologicheskikh predposylkakh radikalizma, ekstremizma, terrorizma / S.B. Tselikovskii ; Yuzhnyi federal'nyi universitet, g. Rostov n/D // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki.-2009.-¹14, vyp. 4/1.-S. 123-129.
8. Perffetti Ch. Psychosemantics: Some cognitive aspects of structural meaning. — Psychol. Bull., 1972, v. 78, N 4, pp. 241—259
9. Shmelev A. G. Kontseptsiya sistem znachenii v eksperimental'noi psikhosemantike. //Voprosy psikhologii, 1983. ¹4 S.21
10. kafedry psikhologii SVGU. – Magadan: Izd-vo SVGU, 2009. Vyp. 7. – S. 85 – 100
11. Serkin V.P. Metody psikhologii sub''ektivnoi semantiki i psikhosemantiki. M.: I Aspekt Press, 2004, s. 207
12. Serkin V.P.Vidy. Formy i novoe opredelenie ponyatiya «znachenie» // Uchenye zapiski
13. Leont'ev D.A. Mirovozzrenie kak mif i mirovozzrenie kak deyatel'nost'. // Mentalitet i kommunikativnaya sreda v tranzitivnom obshchestve / pod red. V.I. Kabrina i O.I Murav'evoi.-Tomsk: Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2004. S. 11-29.
14. Leont'ev A.N. Obraz mira// Izbr. Psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya: V 2 t.-1983. – S. 251–261
15. Leont'ev A. N. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya: V 2-kh t. T. I —M.: Pedagogika, 1983. S.240, S.290
16. Clovar' / Pod. red. M.Yu. Kondrat'eva // Psikhologicheskii leksikon. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' v shesti tomakh / Red.-sost. L.A. Karpenko. Pod obshch. red. A.V. Petrovskogo. — M.: PER SE, 2006. — 176 s.
17. Petrenko V.F. Psikhosemanticheskie aspekty kartiny mira sub''ekta. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2005. T. 2. ¹ 2. S. 3–23.
18. Petrenko V.F. Mnogomernoe soznanie: psikhosemanticheskaya paradigma / M.: Novyi khronograf, 2009. — 440 s.
19. Slovar' prakticheskogo psikhologa / Sost. S.Yu. Golovin. — Minsk: Kharvest; 1998-800 s.
20. O. E. Noyanzina, N. P. Goncharova, G. S. Avdeeva Etnopoliticheskii ekstremizm kak ugroza natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-2.-C. 76-87.
21. V.F. Petrenko. Psikhosemantika soznaniya. M.: IM Un-ta, 1988, S. 10 – 11.
22. Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6-ti t. T. 6. Nauchnoe nasledstvo/Pod red. M. G. Yaroshevskogo. M.: Pedagogika, 1984. C.160
23. Artem'eva E.Yu. Osnovy psikhologii sub''ektivnoi semantiki / Pod red. I.B. Khaninoi. M.: Nauka; Smysl, 1999. – 410 s.
24. Aksenovskaya L.N. Ekstremizm: smysl i rezul'tat (ordernyi aspekt) // Ekstremizm i sredstva massovoi informatsii. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii / Pod red. V.E. Semenova. SPb: Asterion, 2006.
25. A.V. Nikol'skaya. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty mezhvidovogo vzaimodeistviya. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-¹ 7.-C. 48-54.