Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law)
Reference:

Krasheninnikov, E.A. , Baigusheva, Y.V. Definition and application of sub-delegation

Abstract: Analyzing sub-delegation the authors differentiate sub-delegation as such, when a representative provides its substitute with the competence in order to become a new representative for a represented entity (person), and so-called under-delegation, when a representative assigns a substitute for himself as a representative of a represented entity(person). The article substantiates conclusions that in any type of sub-delegation there is no transition of competence, rather a new competence is formed for performing actions, which were initially entrusted on a party involved in sub-delegation. When there is a sub-delegation as such, the primary competence is terminated, and in the cases of under-delegation it remains after the substitute competence appears. The sub-delegation under p.1 of the Art. 187 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in unexpected circumstances is an under-delegation, and both the voluntary representative and the lawful representative may issue competence for the actions within the scope of his original competence. The authors discuss the shortcomings of the current provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on sub-delegation and make propositions de lege ferenda.


Keywords:

competence, under-delegation, substitute, sub-delegation, deal, representative, represented entity (person), warranty of authority, the principle of unacceptability of sub-delegation, transfer of competence.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Hübner H. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches. 2 Aufl. Berlin; New York, 1996. S. 520.
2. Oertmann P. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. ² Buch. Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin, 1908. S. 524.
3. Brox H. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuchs. 8 Aufl. Köln; Ber-lin; Bonn; München, 1984. S. 218.
4. Larenz K. Allgemeiner Teil des deutschen bürgerlichen Rechts. München, 1967. S. 558 (Anm. 1), 559.
5. Becker H. Obligationenrecht. Allgemeine Bestimmungen (Art. 1 – 183). 2 Aufl. Bern, 1941. S. 179.
6. Enneccerus L., Nipperdey H.C. Allgemeiner Teil des bürgerlichen Rechts. 14 Aufl. Tübingen, 1955. Halbbd. 2. S. 801, 802.
7. S. 61 – 67. 2.Tuhr A. Allgemeiner Teil des schweizerischen Obligationenrechts. Tübin-gen, 1924. Halbbd. 1. S. 302.
8. Krasheninnikov E.A., Baigusheva Yu.V. K ponyatiyu polnomochiya // Vest-nik grazhdanskogo prava. 2012. ¹
9. Krasheninnikov E.A. Soderzhanie sub''ektivnogo grazhdanskogo prava // Ocherki po torgovomu pravu. Yaroslavl', 2006. Vyp. 13. S. 16 – 17. Prim. 25
10. Krasheninnikov E.A., Baigusheva Yu.V. Vydacha i ob''em polnomochiya // Vestnik VAS RF. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 79. Prim. 113.
11. Gerlach J.W. Die Untervollmacht. Berlin, 1967. S. 39 – 41.
12. Watter R. Kommentar zu Art. 33 // Kommentar zum schweizerischen Privat-recht. Obligationenrecht ². Art. 1 – 529 OR. Herausgeber H. Honsell, N.P. Vogt, W. Wiegand. 2 Aufl. Basel und Frankfurt a. M., 1996. S. 288.
13. Ioffe O.S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. M., 1967. S. 209.
14. Krasheninnikov E.A. Sdelki, nuzhdayushchiesya v soglasii // Ocherki po torgovomu pravu. Yaroslavl', 2008. Vyp. 15. S. 9.
15. Krasheninnikov E.A. Fakticheskii sostav sdelki // Ocherki po torgovo-mu pravu. Yaroslavl', 2004. Vyp. 11. S. 9. Prim. 13.
16. Krasheninnikov E.A., Baigusheva Yu.V. Odnostoronnie i mnogostoron-nie sdelki // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. ¹ 7. S. 32 – 33.
17. Koziol H., Welser R. Grundriss des bürgerlichen Rechts. 13 Aufl. Wien, 2006. Bd. 1. S. 100.
18. Flume W. Allgemeiner Teil des bürgerlichen Rechts. 4 Aufl. Berlin; Heidel-berg; New York, 1992. Bd. 2. S. 885 ff.
19. Koller A. Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht. Allgemeiner Teil: Grundriss des allgemeinen Schuldrechts ohne Deliktsrecht. Bern, 1996. Bd. 1. S. 32.
20. Ryasentsev V.A. Predstavitel'stvo i sdelki v sovremennom grazhdan-skom prave. M., 2006. S. 308.
21. Palm H. Kommentar zu § 167 // Erman W. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. Hand-kommentar. 10 Aufl. Münster und Köln, 2000. Bd. 1. S. 503.
22. Tuhr A. Der allgemeine Teil des deutschen bürgerlichen Rechts. München und Leipzig, 1918. Bd. 2. Hälfte 2. S. 411. Anm. 231.