Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Boyko, M.E. Structural analysis and typology of actors in narrative culture

Abstract: The article is devoted to the developing method of structural analysis and a new typology of diegetic actors in the narrative and mimetic narrative forms. In order to form a typology of actors, it is offered to use a notion of character, which should not be just mechanically transferred into the theory of narrative culture from psychology, since imaginary actors have no referent figure outside of diegetic world, and, strictly speaking, they have no psyche. However, the actors may be reduced to a combination of characteristic features. It allows to introduce the term of character structure of actors. Consequently, there appears a new typology of actors depending on the structure of their characters — the actors with 0-character, the actors with simple character, and the actors with complicated character. The author offers a quantitative definition of character closeness of actors by providing them with dot-positions in the multi-dimensional space.


Keywords:

philosophy, cultural studies, diegetic person, narrative culture, structural analysis, structuralism, semiotic, character structure of an actor, typology of actors, artistic discourse.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bart R. Nulevaya stepen' pis'ma. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. 2-e izd. M.: Iskusstvo, 1986.
3. Burbaki N. Ocherki po istorii matematiki. M.: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury, 1963.
4. Boyko M.E., Rudnev V.P. Realizm i kharakter // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2011. ¹ 3.
5. Boyko M.E. Metod strukturnogo analiza kharakterov literaturnykh personazhey: Aprobatsiya i pervye itogi // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2012. ¹ 1 (7).
6. Greymas A.Zh., Kurte Zh. Semiotika: ob'yasnitel'nyy slovar' teorii yazyka // Semiotika / Sost. Yu.S. Stepanov. M.: Raduga, 1983.
7. Greymas A.Zh. Strukturnaya semantika: Poisk metoda. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
8. Dekomb V. Sovremennaya frantsuzskaya filosofiya. M.: Ves' Mir, 2000.
9. Karnap R. Znachenie i neobkhodimost': Issledovanie po semantike i modal'noy logike. 2-e izd. M.: LKI, 2007.
10. Kognitivnaya psikhologiya / pod red. V.N. Druzhinina, D.V. Ushakova. M.: PER SE, 2002.
11. Levi-Stros K. Mifologiki: Syroe i prigotovlennoe. M.: Flyuid, 2006.
12. Lichko A.E. Psikhopatii i aktsentuatsii kharaktera u podrostkov. SPb: Rech', 2010.
13. Louen A. Fizicheskaya dinamika struktury kharaktera. M.: Kompaniya PANI, 1996.
14. Martin B., Ringkhem F. Slovar' semiotiki. M.: LIBROKOM, 2010.
15. Net V. Charlz Sanders Pirs // Kritika i semiotika. 2001. ¹ 3/4.
16. Propp V.Ya. Morfologiya volshebnoy skazki. M.: Labirint, 2001.
17. Raykh V. Analiz kharaktera. M.: Aprel' Press, EKSMO-Press, 2000.
18. Rudnev V.P. Proch' ot real'nosti: Issledovanie po filosofii teksta. M.: Agraf, 2000.
19. Skvortsov V.A. Primery metricheskikh prostranstv. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo tsentra nepreryvnogo matematicheskogo obrazovaniya, 2002.
20. Uayt L.A. Ponyatie kul'tury // Antologiya issledovaniy kul'tury. T. 1. SPb: Universitetskaya kniga, 1997.
21. Shmid V. Narratologiya. 2-e izd. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2008.
22. Shreyder Yu.A. Chto takoe rasstoyanie? M.: Fizmatgiz, 1963.
23. Yung K.G. Ob energetike dushi. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2010.
24. Yarkho B.I. Metodologiya tochnogo literaturovedeniya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2006.
25. Osgood C.E., Suci G.J., Tanenbaum P.N. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
26. Peirce C.S. Collected Papers, vols. 1-6, ed. Hartshorne, C. & P. Weiss, vols. 7-8, ed. Burks. A.W. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard Univ. Press, 1931-1958.
27. Shepard R. Multidimentional scaling, free-fitting, and clustering // Science. 1980. Vol. 210. P. 390-398