Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law)
Reference:

Ponomarenko, V.A. On access to civil judicial procedure n “one-stop” principle

Abstract: The author of this article offers an original approach to the topical problems of correlation of civil and arbitration process and establishing their statuses within the legal and legislative systems. The approach includes finding solution in application to each of their particular aspects, such as judicial system, judicial procedure, theoretical legal aspect and systemic legislative aspect. It allows to find the objective prerequisites for the differentiation of civil jurisdiction based on judicial system and procedure, and to establish the independence of the arbitration court procedural form, as well as the lack of necessity to merge arbitration courts and the courts of general jurisdiction and their procedural codes. The author characterizes a number of procedural institutions, such as return of claim, refusal to accept the claim, transfer of the case to another court, within the context of accessibility of justice principle and criteria for its violations. Having analyzed the legal nature of subject-matter jurisdiction of civil cases (between judicial and non-judicial civil jurisdiction bodies), the author came to a conclusion that it is necessary to recognize is as a general term towards the distinction between judicial and arbitration court jurisdiction within the same civil judicial procedure. The author establishes the need to introduce the legislative provisions, which would recognize the differences between the violations of general subject-matter jurisdiction and the violation of jurisdiction between arbitration courts and court of general jurisdiction, and it would allow the court (the arbitration court) to simply transfer the case to the competent court, and to provide for the same rule for any violation of due jurisdiction at any stage of judicial procedure. The appendix to the article includes some proposals for the amendments into the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.


Keywords:

access to justice, differentiation of civil process, judicial and arbitration subject-matter jurisdiction, the “one-stop” principle.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Abova T.E. Arbitrazhnyy sud — konstitutsionnyy organ sudebnoy vlasti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. ¹9. S. 9–15.
2. Abova T.E. O nekotorykh neopravdannykh raskhozhdeniyakh mezhdu deystvuyushchimi APK RF i GPK RF v regulirovanii protsessual'nykh otnosheniy // Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik grazhdansko-go i arbitrazhnogo protsessa. ¹4. 2005. M., 2006. S. 43–49.
3. Alekseev S.S. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990. 312 s.
4. Arbitrazhnyy protsess / pod red. R.E. Gukasyana M., 2008. 448 s.
5. Arbitrazhnyy protsess / pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. M., 2007. 369 s.
6. Bonner A.T. Nekotorye soobrazheniya po sovershenstvovaniyu deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnykh sudov // Zakon. 2012. ¹1. S. 56–59.
7. Blazheev V.V. Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy dal'neyshego sovershenstvovaniya arbi-trazhno–protsessual'noy formy // Problemy dostupnosti i effektivnosti pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. M., 2001. S. 172–179.
8. Vertlib V.A., Farkhadov M.P., Petukhova N.V. Elektronnoe gosudarstvo kak avtomatiziro-vannaya sistema obsluzhivaniya naseleniya. M., 2008. 147 s.
9. Vershinin A.P. Sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav v sude. SPb., 1997. 54 s.
10. Vikut M.A., Zaytsev I.M. Grazhdanskiy protsess Rossii. M., 1999. 281 s.
11. Volkova S.S. Protsessual'nye prepyatstviya k osushchestvleniyu prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2011. ¹1. S. 9–11.
12. Grazhdanskiy protsess / pod red. V.A. Musina, N.A. Chechinoy, D.M. Chechota. SPb., 1996. 336 s.
13. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo / pod red. M.S. Shakaryan. M., 2004. 580 s.
14. Gromoshina N.A. Differentsiatsiya i unifikatsiya v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … d–ra yurid. nauk. M., 2010. 409 s.
15. Gurvich M.A. Pravo na isk. M.–L., 1949g. — v kn. M.A. Gurvich. Izbrannye trudy. T. I. Kras-nodar, 2006. 656 s.
16. Druzhkov P.S. Sudebnaya podvedomstvennost' sporov o prave i inykh pravovykh voprosov, rassmatrivaemykh v poryadke grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1966. 29 s.
17. Eliseykin P.F. Zashchita sub'ektivnykh prav i interesov i kompetentsiya suda v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse // Uch. zap. «Voprosy gosudarstva i prava». T. 31. Ch. 1. Vladivostok, 1969. S. 75–114.
18. Zhilin G.A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual'nye voprosy. M., 2010. 271 s.
19. Zhuykov V.M. Sudebnaya zashchita prav grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits. M., 1997. 231 s.
20. Zhuykov V.M. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1996. 29 s.
21. Zipunnikova Yu.N. Istoriko–pravovoy aspekt ucheniya o protsessual'noy forme // Ros-siyskiy ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa. ¹3. 2004. SPb., 2005. S. 86–93.
22. Ivin A.A. Logika: uchebnik dlya gumanitarnykh fakul'tetov. M., 2002. 241 s.
23. Koval'chuk L. Edinoe grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: byt' ili ne byt'? // Arbitrazh-nyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2005. ¹ 11. S. 45–47.
24. Kozlikhin I.Yu. Pravo, zakon i vlast' v Rossii // Nash trudnyy put' k pravu. Materialy filosofsko–pravovykh chteniy pamyati V.S. Nersesyantsa. M., 2006. 251 s.
25. Kommentariy k GPK RF (postateynyy) / pod red. G.A. Zhilina // SPS «Garant».
26. Mamay E.A. Effektivnost' pravoprimenitel'nykh protsedur (teoriya, praktika, tekhnika): avtoref. … kand. yurid. nauk. N.Novgorod, 2011. 34 s.
27. Montesk'e Sh. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1955. 318 s.
28. Osipov Yu.K. Podvedomstvennost' yuridicheskikh del. Sverdlovsk, 1973. 108 s.
29. Ponomarenko V.A. Formirovanie v Rossii informatsionnogo obshchestva kak predpo-sylka vnedreniya «elektronnogo pravosudiya» v sudebno–arbitrazhnuyu yurisdiktsiyu // Vestnik Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo–Kavkazskogo okruga. ¹ 3 (9) 2012. S. 400–420.
30. Ponomarenko V.A. Federal'nyy zakon ¹ 86–FZ — vazhnyy shag na puti k «elektronnomu pravosudiyu» // Zakon. 2012. ¹ 10. S. 25–32.
31. Popova Yu.A. Integratsiya sudoproizvodstvennykh otrasley sovremennogo prava Rossii (tsivilisticheskiy aspekt) // Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v izmenyayushcheysya Rossii. Sa-ratov, 2007. S. 14–23.
32. Prikhod'ko I.A. Dostupnost' pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse: osnov-nye problemy. SPb., 2005. 361 s.
33. Prokudina L.A. Sovershenstvovanie sudoproizvodstva i protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'-stva Rossii. Sovremennye protsessy unifikatsii i differentsiatsii // Razvitie protses-sual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: k pyatiletiyu deystviya APK RF, GPK RF i FZ «O treteyskikh sudakh s RF». Voronezh, 2008. S. 39–51.
34. Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: obshchaya kharakteristika i tendentsii raz-vitiya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 41–75.
35. Sakhnova T.V. Sudebnye protsedury (o budushchem tsivilisticheskogo protsessa) // Arbitrazh-nyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2009. ¹ 2. S. 9–13; ¹ 3. S. 2–5.
36. Rassakhatskaya N.A. Grazhdanskaya protsessual'naya forma: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov. 1995. 20 s.
37. Reshetnikova I.V. Perspektivy razvitiya grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'-stva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. ¹ 11. S. 9–16.
38. F.A. fon Khayek. Pravo, zakonodatel'stvo i svoboda. Sovremennoe ponimanie liberal'-nykh printsipov spravedlivosti i politiki. M., 2006. 571 s.
39. Fursov D.A. Predmet, sistema i osnovnye printsipy arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo pra-va (problemy teorii i praktiki). M., 1998. 324 s.
40. Fursov D.A., Kharlamova I.V. Teoriya pravosudiya v kratkom trekhtomnom izlozhenii po grazhdanskim delam. T. 2. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo kak forma otpravleniya pravo-sudiya. M., 2009. 209 s.
41. Chechina N.A. Predmet i sistema grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava // Aktual'nye pro-blemy grazhdanskogo protsessa / pod red. V.A. Musina. SPb., 2002. S. 14–35.
42. Shamshurin L.L. Dostupnost' pravosudiya kak garantiya realizatsii prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu v sfere grazhdanskoy yurisdiktsii // Grazhdanskiy i arbitrazhnyy protsess. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 5–8; ¹ 2. S. 5–8.
43. Yarkov V.V. Arbitrazhnym sudam 20 let: dostizheniya i perspektivy // Zakon. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 30–33.
44. Yarkov V.V. Tseli sudoproizvodstva i dostup k pravosudiyu // Problemy dostupnosti i effektivnosti pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. M., 2001. S. 70–87