Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Shemyakin Ya.G., Shemyakina O.D. “Leave and return”: socio-cultural strategy and the reality of history. Research project

Abstract: The article includes a project of a research program. The main goal of the project is to study a socio-cultural mechanism, which guarantees the implementation of certain values and ideas, as accepted by a community, into various social and mental practices. The authors base their research on the concept of “away-and-back” by A.J. Toinbee, they aim to develop it at the current level of humanitarian knowledge, to make it more specific and clarified.

Keywords:

leave-and-return, socio-cultural strategy, humanitarian knowledge, civilization, “classic” civilization, “borderline” civilization, value, ascetic practices, sub-systems of civilization system, syncretic type of creative person

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Dutchak E.E. Iz «Vavilona» v «Belovod'e»: adaptatsionnye vozmozhnosti taezhnykh obshchin staroverov-strannikov (vtoraya polovina Kh1Kh – nachalo KhKh1 v.). Tomsk, 2007.
2. Parsons T. Obshcheteoreticheskie problemy sotsiologii. Sotsiologiya segodnya. M., 1965.
3. Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv. M., 1998.
4. Parsons T. O sotsial'nykh sistemakh. M., 2002.
5. Sedov L.A. K tipologizatsii srednevekovykh obshchestvennykh sistem Vostoka. Popytka sistemnogo podkhoda // Narody Azii i Afriki, 1987, ¹ 5, s. 56-62.
6. Toynbi A. Dzh. Postizhenie istorii. M., 1991.
7. Toporov V.N. Ob odnom iz paradoksov dvizheniya. Neskol'ko zamechaniy o sverkh-empiricheskom smysle glagola «stoyat'», preimushchestvenno v spetsializirovannykh tekstakh // Kontsept puti v yazyke i kul'ture. M., 1996, s. 7-88.
8. Shemyakin Ya.G. Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: vzaimodeystvie tsivilizatsiy v kontekste vsemirnoy istorii. M., 2001.
9. Shemyakin Ya.G. «Pogranichnye» tsivilizatsii planetarnogo masshtaba. Osobennosti i perspektivy evolyutsii // Latinskaya Amerika, 2007, ¹ 7.
10. Shemyakimn Ya.G. Granitsa. (Protsess perekhoda i tip sistemnosti). // ONS, 2009, ¹ 5.
11. Shemyakin Ya.G. Diskurs vzaimodeystviya i vzaimodeystvie diskursov: Rossiya – Latinskaya Amerika – Zapad // ONS, 2011, ¹ 3.
12. Shemyakin Ya.G., Shemyakina O.D. Rossiya – Evraziya: spetsifika formoobrazovaniya v tsivilizatsionnom pogranich'e. Stat'i 1-2 // ONS, 2004, ¹ 4-5.
13. Shemyakin Ya.G., Shemyakina O.D. Puti i usloviya dostizheniya tselostnosti tsivilizatsionnoy sistemy. Sopostavlenie istoricheskogo opyta Rossii i Latinskoy Ameriki // Latinskaya Amerika, 2009, ch. 1-2, ¹ 9-10.
14. Shemyakina O.D. Razryv i preemstvennost' v russkoy kul'turnoy traditsii: opyt dialoga // ONS, 2011, ¹ 1.
15. Parsons T. Structure of Social Action. New York, 1937.
16. Parsons T. Essays in Sociological Theory. New York, London, 1964.
17. Parsons T. Politics and Social Structure. New York, 1969.
18. Parsons T. The Evolution of Societies. Engleword Cliffs (N.Y.), 1977.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.