Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Mendelos E.I. The interaction of state and business in countries with "oligarchic corporatism" (on the example of South Korea and Japan)

Abstract:   This article presents the specificity of the main models of interaction between the government and private sectors – pluralistic and neo-corporatist. The author also examines the key characteristics of the established in the XX century in South Korea and Japan “oligarchic corporatism”, considering the political and cultural traditions. The work highlights the peculiarities of formation of the institution of intersectoral partnership in the countries in question from the perspective of implementation of the Anglo-Saxon and European-continental experience of realization of the projects, as well as the importance of application of South Korean and Japanese experience in establishment and development of the public-private partnership phenomenon in the Russian Federation. The fundamental components of the reviewed models of cooperation are emphasized. Using the comparative-historical method, the author analyzes the establishment of the institution of public-private partnership in South Korea and Japan. The main conclusion consists in determination of the high role of public sector in development of the collaboration project, the confirmation of which was detected in the foreign and Russian studies on this matter. The author underlines the necessity for a more in-depth research of the positive political-legal conjuncture of implementation of the public-private partnership in South Korea and Japan for the purpose of approbation of the results in the Russian political-economic system, which in turn, is also an object of detailed examination within the framework of revelation of the main political-institutional factors of formation of potential of the projects of intersectoral cooperation.    


Keywords:

quasi-corporations, neo-corporatism, pluralist model, models of interaction, public-private partnership, business-structures, state, intersectoral collaboration, chaebol, zaibatsu


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Akopdzhanova M.O. Pravovye perspektivy razvitiya gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva kak ekonomiko-pravovoy formy vzaimodeystviya gosudarstva i biznesa // Finansy i upravlenie. 2014. ¹ 3. C. 23-30. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7802.2014.3.13672. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_13672.html
2. Public Private Partnerships in Australia and Japan. Facilitating Private Sector Participation / Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO); Asia and Oceania Division, Overseas Research Department. Tokyo, 2010. S. 27.
3. Kukhta P. Yaponiya: krizis aziatskoy modeli razvitiya // LB.ua. [2012]. URL: http://economics.lb.ua/business/2012/05/18/151645_yaponiya_krizis_aziatskoy_modeli.html
4. Sun Hak Tae. The Political Economy of Democratic Consolidation. – Seoul: Chonnam National University Press, 2002. S. 219.
5. Yasuhiro Kamimura. Big Deal and Small Deal The New Corporatism in South Korea and Taiwan. The fifth EASP conference at the National Taiwan University, 2008
6. Tat Yan Kong. Power alternation in South Korea // Government and opposition. L., 2000. Vol. 35. S. 376.
7. Eui-Young Kim. The Business Interest Associations and the Political Economy of Development in South Korea. A Paper for the IPSA Congress, Seoul, 1997.
8. Taekyoon Kim. Variants of Corporatist Governance: Differences in the Korean and Japanese Approaches in Dealing with Labor. Yale Journal of International Affairs, 2008.
9. Asmolov K.V. Administrativnaya kul'tura Yuzhnoy Korei // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya: Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal, 2003. ¹ 6. S. 37-44.
10. Peregudov S.P., Lapina N.Yu., Semenenko I.S. Gruppy interesov i rossiyskoe gosudarstvo. M., 1999. S. 34-35.
11. Politologiya: Uchebnoe posobie / Pod red. Turgaeva A.S., Khrenova A.E. SPb.: Piter, 2005. S. 223–226.
12. Agapov I.O. K voprosu o sushchnosti gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. ¹ 2. C. 70-77. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.2.17719. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_17719.html