Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Zaytsev, A.V. Dialogue between the state institution and civil society, its role and place in the institutional analysis of public policy.

Abstract: In his article Zaytsev examines the problem of institutionalization of the dialogue between the state institution and civil society and its role and place in the institutional design of public policy. Zaytsev offers his own definition of “institutional design of public policy” and “public sphere” and analyzes the structure and functions of the dialogue between the state institution and civil society. In this regard, Zaytsev distinguishes between such components of the design of public policy as a dialogue and feedback mechanism. The dialogue between the state institution and civil society is institutionalized in the sphere of public policy where the government and a non-profit organization (i. e. representatives of the state institution and civil society) neither compete nor struggle for the political power but interact and cooperate for the purpose of solving socially important issues. The dialogue between the state institution and civil society is viewed on the basis of the comparative and institutional methodologies and interdisciplinary approach. Within the framework of research, the dialogue means not a conversation of two or more individuals on social and political issues but a particular configuration of the intersubjective interaction in the sphere of public policy based on the principles of transparency, tolerance, openness, apprehensibility, deliberate and symmetric discourse between communication actors. The present article continues the author’s series of articles devoted to the problem of institutionalization of the dialogue between the state institution and civil society. However, this is the first time when the author views the dialogue in terms of the institutional design of the public sphere and a special space for communication where the public opinion is being created. In this regard, the public opinion performs the critical and control functions with regard to the government. Zaytsev also emphasizes the fact that the public sphere is not limited to only communication of citizens but reaches the institutional level of the public dialogue between the civil society and state institution, i. e. state authorities and agencies of political management.


Keywords:

state, civil society, dialogue, public policy, institutionalization, feedback, public sphere, communication, institutional design, structure.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Zaitsev A. V. Dialog v institutsional'noi srede vzaimodeistviya gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: opyt v ES i sovremennaya Rossiya //Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A. Nekrasova. 2012. Tom 18. ¹ 2. S.188-191.
2. Zaitsev A.V. Printsip obratnoi svyazi i institutsionalizatsiya dialoga gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva//NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. Elektronnyi zhurnal. 2012, ¹2, s.1-21. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.2.125. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_125.html.
3. Zaitsev A. V. Dialogicheskaya model' svyazei s obshchestvennost'yu: vozniknovenie, sostoyanie, perspektivy. //Ars administrandi. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 5 – 23. 10. Zaitsev A.V. Deliberativnaya demokratiya, dialog i ikh mesto v konstellyatsii diskursa publichnoi politiki// Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-2013, ¹ 15 (158). Vypusk 27. Seriya «Istoriya. Politologiya. Ekonomika. Informatika». S.147-153. 11. Zaitsev A.V. Deliberativnaya demokratiya v kontekste dialoga gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-10.-C. 1231-1236. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.7708. 12. Zaitsev A.V. Strukturnost' i polifunktsional'nost' institutsional'nogo dialoga v sotsial'no-politicheskom diskurse vlasti i obshchestva// «Vlast'» ¹6, 2011, s.38-40. 13. Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N. Publichnaya politika v regionakh Rossii// Polis: politicheskie issledovaniya. ¹1. 2011. S. 80-96. 14. Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N. Publichnaya politika v sovremennoi Rossii: mezhdu korporativno-byurokraticheskim i grazhdansko-modernizatorskim vyborom // Politiya. 2007. ¹ 1. S.30-51. 15. Samorodova L. L., Krutskaya K. L. Informatsionnaya funktsiya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva// Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta im. T.F. Gorbacheva. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 142 – 146. 16. Usvatov I. S. K voprosu o strukture grazhdanskogo obshchestva: opredeleniya ponyatiya instituta grazhdanskogo obshchestva// Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. 2009. ¹ 4. S. 82–84. 17.Zaitsev A.V. Institutsionalizatsiya publichnykh debatov vo Frantsii i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v publichnoi politike sovremennoi Rossii: sravnitel'nyi analiz // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. 2014. ¹ 5. S.1-41. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.5.12120. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12120.html 18. Zaitsev A.V. INSTITUTsIONAL''NYI DIALOG V SFERE KOMMUNIKATsII GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA: TEORETIKO-METODOLOGIChESKII PODKhOD // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 21-54. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_110.html 19. Zaitsev A.V. PRINTsIP OBRATNOI SVYaZI I INSTITUTsIONALIZATsIYa DIALOGA GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 1-21. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_125.html 20. Zaitsev A.V. DIALOG GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA KAK PEREGOVORNYI PROTsESS: LINGVO-POLITOLOGIChESKII ASPEKT. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-3.-C. 34-47. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_120.html 20. Zaitsev A.V. Novaya Agora: grazhdanskii dialog v Evrosoyuze // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 62-89. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_123.html 21. A.V. Zaitsev Grazhdanskii dialog v ES i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoi Rossii: opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-10.-C. 28-36. 22. Zaitsev A.V. FILOSOFIYa DIALOGA I DIALOGIKA GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA: ISTOKI I SUShchNOST'' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-4.-C. 1-53. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_143.html 23. Zaitsev A.V. DIALOG GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA KAK PEREGOVORNYI PROTsESS: LINGVO-POLITOLOGIChESKII ASPEKT. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-3.-C. 34-47. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_120.html
4. Zaitsev A.V. Strukturnyi funktsionalizm i institutsional'nyi dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoi Rossii// Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A.Nekrasova.-2012, tom 18, ¹ 1, s. 351-354.
5. Auzan A. A., Tambovtsev V. L. Ekonomicheskoe znachenie grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2005. ¹ 5. S. 28-49.
6. Baranov N. A. Publichnost' v kontekste rossiiskoi politiki// Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstva. ¹ 3 (16). 2013. S. 149 – 153.
7. Zaitsev A. V. Strukturnyi funktsionalizm i institutsional'nyi dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoi Rossii// Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A. Nekrasova. 2012. Tom 18. ¹ 1. S. 351-354.
8. Gadyshev A.S. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu publichnoi politiki//Gumanitarnyi vektor. 2010. ¹3 (27). S. 132-134.