|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Politics and Society
Reference:
Merzlyakova, A. V.
Boris Chicherin’s Views on the Role
of State Institution in a Social Life of Russia in Pre-
Revolutionary Researches
// Politics and Society.
2012. ¹ 9.
P. 74-89.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=53955
Merzlyakova, A. V. Boris Chicherin’s Views on the Role of State Institution in a Social Life of Russia in Pre- Revolutionary ResearchesAbstract: Boris Nikolaevich Chicherin (1828—1904) left a remarkable trace in Russian history of law and politics. His concept of development of the Russian state institution was not left unnoticed in Russian academic society. Famous Russian historians and lawyers such as Kluchevsky, Soloviev, Belyaev and Korkunov discussed Chicherin’s doctrine from different points of view. Many ideas presented by the Russian researchers play a significant role in today’s science and are often used by modern historians. Keywords: history, state institution, freedom, liberalism, school (of law), reforms, reaction, theory (organic theory), Slavophiles, Westerners.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Belyaev I.D.Obzor istoricheskogo razvitiya sel'skoi obshchiny v Rossii // Russkaya Beseda.1856. ¹. 1 S. 101 – 147.
2. Belyaev I.D. Eshche o sel'skoi obshchine (otvet g. Chicherinu Russkii Vestnik ¹ 12) // Russkaya Beseda. 1856. ¹ 2. S. 114 – 142. 3. Belyaev I.D. Spor o sel'skoi obshchine S. Solov'eva // Russkaya Beseda. 1856. ¹4. S. 115 – 123. 4. Bestuzhev – Ryumin K.N. Istoricheskoe i politicheskoe doktrinerstvo v ego prakticheskom polozhenii // Otechestvennye zapiski. SPb., Noyabr' 5. 1861. T. CXXXIX. S. 1-10. 6. Bestuzhev-Ryumin K. N. Russkaya istoriya. T.1. Spb., 1872. 7. Kavelin K.D. Oblastnye uchrezhdeniya Rossii v XVII veke // Otechestvennye zapiski. 1865. ¹ 12. S. 428 – 477. 8. Kareev N.I. Nechto ob istoricheskom metode g. Chicherina // Kriticheskoe obozrenie. ¹ 22. S. 23 – 26. 9. Korkunov N.M. Istoriya filosofii prava: posobie k lektsiyam. SPb., 1898. 10. Klyuchevskii V.O. Sostav predstavitel'stva na zemskikh soborakh drevnei Rusi (Posvyashchaetsya B.N. Chicherinu) // Russkaya mysl'. Kniga 1. 1890, S. 141– 178. 11. Koyalovich M.I. Oblastnye uchrezhdeniya Rossii v XVII veke. (perepechatano po chetvertomu izdaniya avtora, izdannomu v 1901 godu). Minsk, 1997. 687 S. 12. Krylov N. Yuridicheskie zametki professora Krylova // Molva. Literaturnaya gazeta. 1857. ¹ 2. S. 25 – 28. 13. Krylov N. Yuridicheskii otvet redaktsii Russkogo Vestnika, na stat'yu pomeshchennuyu v pervoi knizhke ¹ 7 1857 g. za aprel' pod zaglaviem «Izoblichitel'nye pis'ma» // Molva. Literaturnaya gazeta. 1857. ¹ 3. S.37. 14. Krylov N. Kriticheskie zamechaniya na sochinenie g. Chicherina «Oblastnye uchrezhdeniya Rossii v XVII veke // Russkaya Beseda. 1857. ¹ 2. S. 89 – 166. 15. Krylov N. Oblastnye uchrezhdeniya v Rossii v XVII v. Sochinenie B.N. Chicherina (okonchanie) // Russkaya beseda. 1856. ch. IV. S. 54 – 114. 16. Kr … ev'' I. Oblastnye uchrezhdeniya v Rossii v XVII v. Sochinenie B.N. Chicherina // Russkaya beseda. 1856. ch. III. S. 46 – 87; 17. Kr … ev'' I. Oblastnye uchrezhdeniya v Rossii v XVII v. Sochinenie B.N. Chicherina (okonchanie) // Russkaya beseda. 1856. ch. IV. S. 54 – 114. 18. Milyukov P.N. Yuridicheskaya shkola v russkoi istoriografii. (Solov'ev, Kavelin, Chicherin, Sergeevich). // Russkaya mysl'. 1886. ¹ 6. S. 80 – 92. 19. Mikhailovskii I.V. Vozzreniya B.N. Chicherina na pravo i gosudarstvo // Obrazovanie. 1907. ¹ 7. otd. 2. S. 24 – 38. S. 24. 20. Pavlov-Sil'vanskii N.P. Feodalizm v udel'noi Rusi. SPB., 1910. 506 S. 21. Pavlov-Sil'vanskii N.P. Feodalizm v Rossii. M., 1988. 22. Solov'ev S.M. Spor o sel'skoi obshchine // Russkii vestnik. 1856. T.6. S. 285 – 303. 693 S. 23. Solov'ev S.M. . Neskol'ko dopolnitel'nykh slov k stat'e «Spor o sel'skoi obshchine» // Russkii vestnik. T.6. S. 192 – 196. 24. Shchapov A.P. Estestvoznanie i narodnaya ekonomiya // Sochineniya. T. II. 1906. S. 154 – 181 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
