Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Teslenko A.V. To the question of addressee of knowingly false report: comparative legal analysis of the Russian, European, and U. S. legislations

Abstract: The subject of this research is the addressee of knowingly false reports of a crime or an individual committing it, since designation of such addressee does not exist in the Russian Criminal Code (Article 306). A special attention is given to the scientific discourse on this issue, which has gone on for several years. The author carefully examines different versions of branches and officials to which a knowingly false report should be directed in order to qualify the crime according to Article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, suggested by the Russian legal experts. The author justifies the proposal to introduce changes in the disposition of the Article 306 of the CCRF pertaining to the department for handling knowingly false reports. It is proposed to express the disposition of the Part 1 of the Article 306 of the CCRF in the following way: “knowingly false report to an agency or an official authorized to carry out criminal investigation and/or enforce law, and equally the court on commission of a crime”.


Keywords:

legal authorities, false accusation, crime, justice, motive, purpose, false accusation, court, false report, lie


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya / Pod red. Galakhovoy A.V. M.: Norma, 2005. 416 c.
2. Anuchina A.I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii i dokazyvaniya // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. ¹ 2(58). S.73-77.
3. Fedorov A.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya (voprosy istorii, ponyatiya i klassifikatsii) / Otv. redaktor A.I.Chuchaev. Kaluga: Izd-vo AKF «Politop», 2004. 284 c.
4. Sinel'nikov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot osushchestvleniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i prinyatiya mer k ego obespecheniyu: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i differentsiatsii / Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2010. 210 c.
5. Ugolovnyy kodeks Shtata Tekhas / Nauch. Red. I.D. Kozochkin. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2006. 576 c.
6. Sinel'nikov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot osushchestvleniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i prinyatiya mer k ego obespecheniyu: problemy zakonodatel'noy reglamentatsii i differentsiatsii / Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2010. 210 c.
7. North Dakota Century Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t12-1.html (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
8. North Carolina General Statutes [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/statutes/statutestoc.pl?Chapter=0014 (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
9. Arizona Revised Statutes Title 13. Criminal Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-13-criminal-code/az-rev-st-sect-13-2907-01.html (data obrashcheniya: 13 oktyabrya 2015 goda).
10. Kentucky Legislature [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/chapter.aspx?id=39389 (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
11. Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Moldovy [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.crimpravo.ru/page/zar-uk/(data obrashcheniya 22.05.2015).
12. Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki San-Marino / Nauch. red. S.V. Maksimova. SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2002. – 251 c.
13. Florida Penal Code [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://law.justia.com/codes/florida/2005/ TitleXLVI/ch0837.html) (data obrashcheniya 15.12.2015).
14. Ugolovnyy kodeks Litovskoy respubliki / Nauch. red. N.I. Mantseva. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. 468 c.
15. Ugolovnyy kodeks Ukrainy [Elektronnyy resurs]. – URL: http://www.crimpravo.ru/page/zar-uk/ (data obrashcheniya 21.08.2015).
16. Ugolovnyy kodeks FRG. M.: Izd-vo «Zertsalo-M», 2001. 208 c.
17. Ugolovnyy kodeks Ispanii / Nauch. red. N.F. Kuznetsova, F.M. Reshetnikov. M. Izd-vo «Zertsalo», 1998. 219 c.
18. Ugolovnyy kodeks Bel'gii / Nauch. red. N.I. Mantsev. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2004. 559 c.
19. Ugolovnyy kodeks Norvegii / Nauch. red. Yu.V. Golika. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. 272 c.
20. Novyy Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii. M.: Yuridicheskiy kolledzh MGU, 1993. 212 c.
21. Dvoryanskov I.V. Prestupleniya, narushayushchie protsessual'nye usloviya polucheniya dokazatel'stv // «Chernye dyry» v ros. zakonodatel'stve. 2003. ¹ 2. S. 226-245.
22. Dvoryanskov I.V. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana interesov sudebnoy vlasti. Monografiya. M.: Izdatel'skiy tsentr RGU nefti i gaza imeni I.M. Gubkina, 2013. 377 s.
23. Khloptseva E.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana pravosudiya. Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 1995. 210 c.
24. Smolin S.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za zavedomo lozhnyy donos: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 234 c.
25. Fargiev I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: (aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki) / Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. ¹ 5. S. 61-65.
26. Gorelik A.S., Lobanova L.V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. SPb.: Izd-vo «Yur. tsentr Press», 2005. 491 c.
27. Kul'berg Ya.M. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1962. 63 c.
28. Khabibullin M.Kh. Otvetstvennost' za zavedomo lozhnyy donos i zavedomo lozhnoe pokazanie po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Kazan', 1975. 160 c.
29. Fargiev I. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: (aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. ¹ 5. S. 61-65.
30. Brilliantov A. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: voprosy kvalifikatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. ¹ 3 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
31. Efremov V.P. Zavedomo lozhnyy donos: voprosy kvalifikatsii v aspekte vzaimosvyazi norm ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. ¹ 3 S. 45-49.