Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Shashkova A.V. Emergence of corporation as independent legal entities (analysis of the case of Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd)

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the analysis of the concept of corporation as a separate entity of civil law. The author explores this concept on the example of English precedent on the case of Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd. Analysis is conducted on the stages of this process and conclusions that were obtained by the courts of various levels, as well as changes of both, the resolute and motivated part of court ruling depending on the interpretation applied. The conducted research allows us to claim that it is at the stage of industrial society that the concept of corporation as a separate legal entity with the complex of its rights and obligations has been formed. Among the main conclusions of the conducted research is the fact the corporations also existed in the preindustrial society, but it was at the stage of postindustrial development that the concept of corporation as a separate legal entity has emerged. The author’s contribution into the research of this topic consists in the political and legal analysis of this question. The scientific novelty consists in the fact that there is no prior analysis and assessment of the significance of the English precedent based on the case of Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd.


Keywords:

court decision, House of Lords, company, separate entity, industrial society, Salomon v. Salomon, corporation, precedent, on the case, higher authority


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh stran. Sbornik. / Sost. V.N. Dubrovin. – M.: Yurlitinform.-2009. – 440s.
2. Rakhmilovich V.A. O prave sobstvennosti na veshch', otchuzhdennuyu neupravomochennym litsom dobrosovestnomu priobretatelyu (k voprosu o priobretenii ot neupravomochennogo litsa) // Problemy sovremennogo grazhdanskogo prava: Sbornik statey. M.-2000.-S. 126-144.
3. Konovalov A.V. Vladenie i vladel'cheskaya zashchita v grazhdanskom prave // SPb.-2001. – c. 299
4. Dal' V.I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t. T. 4. // M.: TERRA.-1995.-C. 574
5. Dodonov V.N. Slovar' grazhdanskogo prava. / pod obshch. red. V.V. Zalesskogo. M.-1997.-C. 294
6. Shashkova A.V. Study Manual on Bases of Russian Law // Cambridge Scholars Publishing. – 2015. – p.374Gribanov V.P. Predely osushchestvleniya i zashchity grazhdanskikh prav // Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav (v serii "Klassika rossiyskoy tsivilistiki"). M.-2000.-S. 19-212
7. Mankoff M. The poverty in progress: The political economy of American social problems // Holt, Rinehart and Winston.-1972.-P. 524
8. Pulbrook A. The Companies Act, 1862, with analytical references and copious index. // Effigham Wison.-1865.-P. 233
9. Goulding S. Company Law // Cavendish Publishing Limited. London – Sydney. 2nd edition.-1999.-P.430. – c.92. c.54 c.55
10. Bloch H. Ruth. Corporations and the Fourteenth Amendment // UCLA.-2013.-P.64. – p.31
11. Dignam A. Company Law // Oxford University Press.-2011. – P. 646.
12. Galbraith, J. K. The New Industrial State // Princeton University Press.-2007.-P. 576
13. Grantham R. Corporate personality in the 20th Century // Hart Publishing. Oxford.-1998.-P. 295
14. AN ACT TO CONSOLIDATE AND REVISE THE LAW RESPECTING THE INCORPORATION, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF COMPANIES. Act No.18 of 1992 (as amended by Act No.24 of 1993, Act No.28 of 1994 and Act No.30 of 1995) (Date of commencement-1st August, 1992) Enacted by the Parliament of The Bahamas.
15. N. Yu. Erpyleva, M. N. Klevchenkova Statut yuridicheskikh lits v prave Evropeyskogo Soyuza. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2011.-4.-C. 85-112.
16. Trofimova E.V. Istoriko-pravovye aspekty legitimatsii sub'ektov
17. predprinimatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1390 - 1401. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9550.