Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Akopdzhanova M.O. Criminal legal protection of the procedure of archeological excavations: new legislation

Abstract: The subject of this research is the questions of criminal legal protection of cultural and archeological heritage of the Russian Federation. The research is conducted based on the analysis of the changes to the current Russian legislation on protection of the objects of cultural heritage and changes to the criminal legislation on protection of these objects made by the Federal Law #245-FZ from July 23, 2013. It examines the objective and subjective definitions of a crime provided by the article #2433 introduced into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A review is given to the issues of implementation of criminal legislation and the law on the protection of cultural heritage based on the new changes stated above. The article analyzes the key relevant aspects of implementing the dispositions of the norms of criminal law on the responsibility of protection of cultural and archeological heritage. The conclusion made in this article can be useful for the law enforcement agencies in investigation and review of criminal cases pertaining to this category, students, post-graduate students, as well as all who are interested in the issues of jurisprudence.

Keywords:

Criminal legal protection, Archeological heritage, Cultural heritage, Legislation on culture, Criminal law, Disposition of criminal legal norm, Signs of criminal activity, Criminal liability, Circumstances that exampt from liability, Archeological field work.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Anisimov I.O. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «podvodnoe kul'turnoe nasledie» i «vsemirnoe kul'turnoe i prirodnoe nasledie» // Pravo i politika. – 2014.-¹ 7. – S. 996-1004.
2. Zubenko Yu.S. Pravovye problemy okhrany arkheologicheskikh nakhodok v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: istoriya i sovremennost' // Pravo i politika. – 2010.-¹ 1. – S. 36-41.
3. Kazakova Yu.A. Evolyutsiya gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya sfery kul'tury // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2011.-¹
4. – S. 8-17. 4.Martynenko I.E. Problema povysheniya effektivnosti pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti po predotvrashcheniyu nezakonnogo prisvoeniya kul'turnykh tsennostey, poluchennykh v rezul'tate nelegal'nykh raskopok // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. – 2010.-¹ 3. – S. 76-81.
5. Rabotkevich A.V. Normativnoe obespechenie deyatel'nosti po okhrane ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya // Kul'tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. – 2010.-¹ 3. – S. 2-3.
6. A.V. Sumachev K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostey
7. i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo
8. rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 2074 - 2079.
9. Dubovik O.L. Fundamental'noe issledovanie prestupleniya i nakazaniya v istorii i kul'ture Rossii (Retsenziya na knigu: Naumov A.V. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v istorii Rossii. V 2 ch. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. Ch. I. – 752 s., Ch. II. – 656 s.). // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 6. - C. 651 - 658. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12381.
10. Akopdzhanova M.O. O roli ugolovno-pravovoy nauki v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 76 - 81. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9217.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.