Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Chukreev A.A. On the question of the grounds for contractual responsibility of a trustee

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the grounds for contractual responsibility of a trustee as one of the controversial issues within the doctrine of this legal institution. The subject of this research is the scientific concepts on the grounds for contractual responsibility of a trustee before the beneficiary or trustor, as well as the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation that establish these grounds. Both, the normative acts that regulate the issues of fiduciary management, and court rulings are being reviewed. This responsibility represents a unique transitional form, which combines the elements of two types of responsibility: with and without infraction. The author makes a conclusion that the main flaw within the legal norms that establish these grounds for contractual responsibility of a trustee consists not in the definition of subjective conditions of implementing proper sanctions, but in the lack of the regulation of the responsibilities of a trustee and their due level of diligence.


Keywords:

Fiduciary management, trustee, grounds for contractual responsibility, beneficiary, trustor, infraction, diligence, contract, losses, performing duties.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 3 t. — T. 1. — 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. / otv. red. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoi. — M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2006. — 776 s.
2. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik. — Tom II / pod red. O. N. Sadikova. — M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT»: «INFRA-M», 2006. — 608 s.
3. Khromushin S. V. Doveritel'noe upravlenie v kachestve professional'noi deyatel'nosti na rynke tsennykh bumag (pravovye aspekty). — Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. — M., 2000. — 180 c.
4. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 3 t. T. 2. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. / otv. red. A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoi. — M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2005. — 848 s.
5. Vitryanskii V. V. Osobennosti otvetstvennosti za narushenie «predprinimatel'skogo» dogovora // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. — 2008. — ¹ 1. — S. 20–26.
6. Yasus M. O neobkhodimosti ustanovleniya spetsial'noi otvetstvennosti za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o tsennykh bumagakh // Khozyaistvo i pravo. — 2011. — ¹ 5. — S. 70-77.
7. Gordeeva N. G. Otvetstvennost' storon po dogovoru doveritel'nogo upravleniya imushchestvom // Yurist. — 2009. — ¹ 11. — S. 19–25.
8. Samigulina A. V. Osobennosti doveritel'nogo upravleniya tsennymi bumagami // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2014. — ¹ 5. — S. 33–37.
9. Yasus M. V. Dobrosovestnoe doveritel'noe upravlenie tsennymi bumagami v sovremennoi Rossii v otsutstvie edinogo federal'nogo zakona: mif ili real'nost' // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. — 2010. — ¹ 8. — S. 5–11.
10. Selivanovskii A. S. Nekotorye problemy doveritel'nogo upravleniya tsennymi bumagami // Moskovskii yurist. — 2012. — ¹ 2. — S. 91–100.
11. Mikheeva L. Tsennye bumagi i denezhnye sredstva kak ob''ekty doveritel'nogo upravleniya // Khozyaistvo i pravo. — 1998. — ¹ 9. — S. 41–46.
12. Braginskii M. I., Vitryanskii V. V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga tret'ya: Dogovory o vypolnenii rabot i okazanii uslug. — M.: Statut, 2004. — 1055 s.
13. Benevolenskaya Z. E. Doveritel'noe upravlenie imushchestvom v sfere predprinimatel'stva. — SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2002. — 282 s.
14. Federal'nyi zakon ot 22 aprelya 1996 g. ¹ 39-FZ «O rynke tsennykh bumag» // SZ. — 1996. — ¹ 17. — St. 1918.
15. Prikaza Federal'noi sluzhby po finansovym rynkam ot 3 aprelya 2007 g. ¹ 07-37/pz-n «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka osushchestvleniya deyatel'nosti po upravleniyu tsennymi bumagami» // Byulleten' normativnykh aktov federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noi vlasti. — 2007. — ¹ 26.
16. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 9 dekabrya 1996 g. ¹ 1660 «O peredache v doveritel'noe upravlenie zakreplennykh v federal'noi sobstvennosti aktsii aktsionernykh obshchestv, sozdannykh v protsesse privatizatsii» // SZ. — 1996. — ¹ 51. — St. 5764.
17. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Chast' pervaya ot 30 noyabrya 1994 g. ¹ 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii (dalee — SZ). — 1994. — ¹ 32. — St. 3301. Chast' vtoraya ot 26 yanvarya 1996 g. ¹ 14-FZ // SZ. — 1996. — ¹ 5. — St. 410.
18. Dmitrieva O. V. Otvetstvennost' bez viny v grazhdanskom prave: uchebnoe posobie. — Voronezh: Izd-vo VVSh MVD RF, 1997. — 136 s.
19. Mal'ko A. V., Subochev V. V. Zakonnye interesy kak pravovaya kategoriya. — SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004. — 359 s.
20. Selivanovskii A.S. Upravlyayushchii na rynke tsennykh bumag: konflikt interesov // Zakon. — 2011. — ¹ 12. — S. 76–82.