Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Bogdan V.V. Legal-comparative characteristics of the practice of implementation of “consumer protection” laws by the courts of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus: specifi c aspects

Abstract: After enacting consumer protection laws in the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Belarus the nations established a modern national system of protection of consumer rights, which contributed to creation of civil legal mechanism of consumer protection in the market of goods and services. Despite the fact that Belarusian, Ukrainian, and Russian legislation was based on the general international principles of consumer protection and has a number of similar in content positions, its implementation still has its own specificity that reflects the nature of each civil legal mechanism of consumer protection. In the course of this research the author comes to the conclusions that the analysis and the derived positions can be used in devising a scientific concept of development of civil legal relations with participation of consumers, and the similarity between the legal systems, as well as the experience of implementation of laws testifies to the objective possibility and opportunity for a mutual sharing of separate legal norms.

Keywords:

Consumer, law enforcement, protection of rights, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, legislation, comparative jurisprudence, law, Supreme Court.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Kostennikov M.V., Lobanov S.A.. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya zashchita prav potrebitelei // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107.
2. A. A. Burtseva. Sotsial'naya predprinimatel'skaya deyatel'nost' nekommercheskikh organizatsii v Rossii kak ob''ekt pravovogo regulirovaniya // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107.
3. K. V. Moiseev. Maloe predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii i za rubezhom // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107.
4. Lobanov S.A.. Problemy vzaimodeistviya yurisdiktsionnykh organov v sfere potrebitel'skogo rynka // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
5. Fursa S.Ya., Karmaza O.O. Osnovi spozhivchikh znan'. Zakhist prav spozhivachiv: sudova ta advokats'ka praktika.-Kiev, 2009.-704 s.
6. Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovoi mentalitet rossiiskikh grazhdan // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-4.-C. 108-133. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_310.html
7. Kaminskaya N.V., Bukach V.V., Bilas I.G. Yuridicheskoe soderzhanie konstitutsionnogo prava na obrashchenie v kontekste Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Konstitutsii Ukrainy // Pravo i politika.-2013.-13.-C. 1825-1830. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.9817.
8. Tarasova T.V.. Ponyatie standarta potrebitel'skogo povedeniya v rynochnoi ekonomike // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.9107.
9. N. V. Parancheva, N. A. Efremova. Osobennosti primeneniya zakonodatel'stva o zashchite prav potrebitelei // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107.
10. Lobanov S.A.. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie torgovoi deyatel'nosti v sisteme potrebitel'skogo rynka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107.
11. Lobanov S.A.. Normy administrativnogo prava v yurisdiktsionnoi deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del v sfere potrebitel'skogo rynka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
12. Lobanov S.A.. Problemy kvalifikatsii administrativnykh pravonarushenii v sfere potrebitel'skogo rynka // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
13. Lanina E.Yu.. Administrativno-pravovoe obespechenie organami vnutrennikh del pravoporyadka v sfere potrebitel'skogo rynka. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2010. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
14. E. A. Kotova. Aktual'nye voprosy torgovoi deyatel'nosti (torgovli) kak ob''ekta grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 10.
15. Bogolyubskii S.S.. K voprosu o genezise viktimnogo, voznikayushchego pri osushchestvlenii predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.03.8.
16. Belykh V.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti.-M., 2010.-423 s.
17. Gurylev B. Dogovornaya podsudnost': svoboda voli ili ushchemlenie prav potrebitelei // Yuridicheskaya gazeta.-2011.-¹ 12. / SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»: poisk po avtoru.
18. Danilov V.V. Zashchita prav potrebitelya v sisteme konstitutsionnykh prav cheloveka v Rossii. Avtoref. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2009.-26 s.
19. Kiryushina I.V. Pravovoi status potrebitelya i ego realizatsiya v grazhdanskom prave. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-Barnaul, 2004.-215 s.
20. Kornilov E. Yuridicheskoe litso kak potrebitel' // Zakon.-1999.-¹ 3.-S. 120-123.
21. Leiboshits A.V. Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo protsessa: dogovornaya podsudnost' po delam s uchastiem potrebitelei // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo.-2011.-¹ 5.-S. 135-147.
22. Mikhailov D.I. Dogovor vozmezdnogo okazaniya uslug: voprosy povysheniya urovnya zashchity prav potrebitelei // Yuridicheskii zhurnal.-2009.-¹ 4.-S. 14-18.
23. Lobanov S.A.. K voprosu o ponyatii i soderzhanii administrativnoi yurisdiktsii v sfere potrebitel'skogo rynka. // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.