Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Hachatryan, A.K. Amnesty as the type of dismissal from criminal responsibility for the crimes in the sphere of economic activity

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the so-called “economic amnesty” as the type of dismissal from criminal responsibility for the crimes in the economic sphere. The author singles out the general characteristics of amnesty as a type of dismissal from criminal responsibility, providing analysis of its application to the economic crimes. Based upon the analysis of the practice of application of the decree on the amnesty, the author shows the difficulties regarding legal formulae and de facto implementation of the amnesty conditions, especially those concerning compensation of the damage. The author analyzes the general targets of the amnesty. The article is based upon the use of sociological and formal legal methods in the analysis of the practice of amnesty application. The author also used statistical method in order to evaluate amnesty efficiency. The practice of application of amnesty has shown its imperfections in part of defining the conditions for the amnesty, their procedural implementation at the pre-trial and trial stages of the criminal process. In the future the use of such amnesties seems unviable, rather, the criminal law should be amended to make some sanctions in the Articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation more humane, and the legal practice should be corrected in order to avoid judicial mistakes.


Keywords:

Amnesty, crime, sphere of economic activity, freeing, criminal responsibility, compensation of damage, principle of humanism, elements of a crime, rules of a game, “pre-ordered” cases.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Petrukhin I. L. Prezumptsiya nevinovnosti – konstitutsionnyy printsip sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. // Sovetskoe gosudar-stvo i pravo. 1978. ¹ 12. S. 18–26.
2. Osyak A. N. Institut amnistii v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-n/D., 2006. 26 s.
3. Osmolovskaya N. V. Amnistiya i pomilovanie kak sredstva korrek-tirovaniya karatel'noy politiki gosudarstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2006. 18 s.
4. Marogulova I. L. Zakonodatel'nye problemy amnistii i pomi-lovaniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1998. ¹ 1. S. 38–44.
5. Komol'tseva A. A., Ivashkina E. A. Institut amnistii: pravovaya priroda i problemy primeneniya v sovremennoy Rossii // Ugo-lovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 22–25.
6. Kolokolov N. Vot tebe, predprinimatel', i Yur'ev den'... // EZh-Yurist. 2013. ¹ 33. S. 3.
7. Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyakh i nakazaniyakh. M., 1995. 303 s.
8. Vasil'eva I. A. Amnistiya i ee realizatsiya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2003. 24 s.
9. Pochechueva O. S. Ob opredelenii vreda poterpevshim – yuridiche-skim litsam na predvaritel'nom sledstvii v svete «predprini-matel'skoy» amnistii // Advokat. 2013. ¹ 9. S. 5–9.
10. T. M. Sekretareva. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti ogranicheniya prava na amnistiyu. // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2010. – ¹ 9.
11. Protopopova N.I.. Nalogovaya amnistiya kak institut ekonomicheskoy politiki gosudarstva: rossiyskaya praktika // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2008. – ¹ 3
12. Salkazanov A.E. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov s organizatsii v RF (st.199 UK RF) // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 336 - 342. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.3.11487.
13. Bukalerova L.A., Shel'menkova Ya.Yu. K voprosu ob osvobozhdenii
14. ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti
15. v svyazi s istecheniem srokov davnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 910 - 916. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.8966.
16. Tokarchuk R.E. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' kak obshchiy printsip ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 1. - C. 126 - 142. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_51.html
17. Antonova E.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' korporativnogo (kollektivnogo) sub'ekta za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 192 - 220. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.568. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_568.html
18. Salkazanov A.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2013. - 11. - C. 852 - 859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
19. Kashkina E.V., Khandogina A.V. Administrativnyy nadzor za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody: problemy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 375 - 379. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10133.
20. Dolgikh I.P., Shebanov D.V. Ob optimizatsii ponyatiya "khishchenie" v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - 5. - C. 23 - 37. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11933. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11933.html
21. M.O. Akopdzhanova Dispozitsii norm ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva
22. Rossii o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh:
23. voprosy razgranicheniya sostavov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 6. - C. 105 - 109.