Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Polyakova, V.E. Consent to conclusion as a condition for validity of a preliminary contract: German and Russian experience

Abstract: The article contains analysis of legal approaches of Russia and Germany towards the issue of the need for approval of preliminary contract, providing for conclusion of the main contract, requiring consent (of organs of a legal entity, third parties, state and municipal bodies). It is noted that in Russia the range of deals requiring approval and necessary formulae is quite diverse. At the same time a preliminary contract is not directly included into the list of deals, which need to be approved. Both the doctrine and practice have ambiguous approaches towards application of requirements on approval for the main contract to a preliminary contract as well. At the same time the German scholars have attempted to find common rules for resolution of the relevant situation. Methodological basis for the article includes traditional scientific and specialized research methods – dialectic, formal logical, method of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison. An important accent is made upon the comparative legal method. As a result of the study the author concludes that developments of the German doctrine are not alien to the Russian reality, and they may be extrapolated onto the Russian soil: application of requirement on approval of a deal to a preliminary contract is viable when provision of a permission is due to the social goals (such as protection of persons with limited legal capability). In other cases the requirement of approval of the preliminary deal is not reasonable.


Keywords:

Organs of a legal entity, agreement, approval, German law, Russian law, main contract, preliminary contract, third parties, state organs, distribution of property.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Moldovanov M.M. Analiz dogovora bankovskogo vklada kak instrumenta bor'by s mirovym finansovo-ekonomicheskim krizisom na primere ryada zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.100-120. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.1.569. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/flc/article_569.html
2. Goncharenko E.A. Osobennosti zaklyucheniya kreditnogo dogovora, ispolnenie kotorogo obespecheno ipotekoi // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.37-43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.4.2227. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/flc/article_2227.html
3. Akhrameeva O.V. Opredelenie podsudnosti v delakh pri osparivanii obyazatel'stv po dogovoru, v kotorom ne opredeleno mesto ego ispolneniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 7.-S.168-176. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8939. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8939.html
4. Men'shenin P. A. Predvaritel'nyi dogovor v rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 2011.
5. Men'shenin P.A. Osobennosti sostava i predposylok deistvitel'nosti predvaritel'nogo dogovora // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2011.-¹ 2.
6. Petrov D.A. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty primeneniya norm o predvaritel'nom dogovore v kommercheskom oborote nedvizhimosti // Arbitrazhnye spory.-2009.-¹ 3.
7. Makeeva E. Sdelki s uslozhnennoi protseduroi zaklyucheniya: forma vs. soderzhanie Korporativnyi yurist.-2007.-¹ 1.
8. Kommentarii k Federal'nomu zakonu «O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve)» (postateinyi) / Pod red. V.F. Popondopulo. M., 2011.
9. Krasavchikov O.A. Grazhdanskie organizatsionno-pravovye otnosheniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1966. ¹ 10.
10. Vasil'ev A.B. Predvaritel'nyi dogovor v prave Rossii i SShA. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007.
11. Yu.V. Volokitina. Investitsionnye spory s uchastiem Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.12
12. O.K. German. Grazhdansko-pravovaya priroda dogovora ob uchastii v dolevom stroitel'stve // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.16
13. A.V. Zakupen'. Mesto kreditnogo dogovora v sisteme dogovornykh obyazatel'stv // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.15
14. Henrich D. Vorvertrag, Optionsvertrag, Vorrechtsvertrag. Eine dogmatisch-systematische Untersuchung der vertraglichen Bindungen vor und zu einem Vertragsschluss. (Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht).-Berlin, 1965.
15. Herzog N. Der Vorvertrag im schweizerischen und deutschen Schuldrecht.-Zuerich, 1999.
16. Staudinger J. Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen. – Berlin, 2010.
17. Wabnitz, B. Der Vorvertrag in rechtsgeschichte und rechtsvergleichender Betrachtung.-Muenster, 1962.
18. Polotovskaya E.Yu. Imushchestvo gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) uchrezhdenii: pravo operativnogo
19. upravleniya ili pravo sobstvennosti? // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 5. - C. 9 - 11.
20. Kireeva N.V. Tipologiya integratsionnykh svyazei // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 176 - 182. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.2.9789.