Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Korchagin, A.G., Chertorinskiy, E.A. Interest of the legal entity as one of the means of protection of rights of shareholders

Abstract: The article concerns the issues of responsibility of one-person and collegiate managing bodies of a legal entity through the prism of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of July 30, 2013 N. 62 “On some issues regarding compensation of damage by the persons holding positions in the bodies of a legal entity”, as well as the role of the legal category of interest of a legal entity, being key in the corporate disputes. The authors provide characteristics of piercing the corporate veil, its elements and grounds for bringing the managing persons to responsibility, as well as the balance of interests of majority and minority shareholders and means of protection of the assets of a legal entity in cases of conflict of interests. The article includes analysis of the practice of the civil law responsibility of the members of the managing bodies of a legal entity taking into consideration the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of July 30, 2013 N. 62 “On some issues regarding compensation of damage by the persons holding positions in the bodies of a legal entity”, establishing the legal targets when defining the balance of interests of shareholders and managing bodies of a legal entity. In the opinion of the authors the legal basis for the application of doctrine for piercing the corporate veil in Russia should be the norm of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on abuse of a right. Abroad good faith is understood as an obligation of the parties to cooperate in order to achieve some common result of the economic deal. Such a non-legal declaration should still be reflected in the specific obligations, as provided by law (for example, to avoid influence upon the will of the parties, etc.). At the same time, the courts need clear directions regarding what needs to be proven in such cases.


Keywords:

interest, balance of interests, legal entities, shareholders, fiction, legal relations, legal practice, corporate veil, responsibility, losses.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Kurbatov A. Ya. Printsip nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya pravom: k starym problemam dobavilis' novye // Zakon. 2013. ¹ 9. S. 36-37. starym problemam dobavilis' novye // Zakon. 2013. ¹ 9. S. 36-37.
2. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
3. Martynenko S. M. Vzyskanie ubytkov s direktora kompanii. VAS RF uvelichil shansy kreditorov na pobedu // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2013. ¹ 10. S. 60-66.
4. Vasil'eva N., Peregudov I., Tay Yu. Narushenie korporativnykh protsedur kak osnovanie nastupleniya otvetstvennosti aktsionernogo obshchestva i mazhoritarnogo aktsionera // Korporativnyy yurist. 2008. ¹ 11. S. 146-149.
5. Molotnikov A. E. Problemy vzaimodeystviya i pravovogo regulirovaniya kontroliruyushchikh, krupnykh i minoritarnykh aktsionerov v Rossii // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2009. ¹ 1. S. 2-4.
6. Savinykh V. A. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost': ekonomicheskoe soderzhanie i pravovaya sushchnost' // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. ¹ 12. S. 67.
7. Zhukova T. V. Sdelka zaklyuchena podkontrol'nym obshchestvom. Kak ustanovit' kontroliruyushchee litso // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 75-77.
8. Lomakin D. V. Kontseptsiya snyatiya korporativnogo pokrova: realizatsiya ee osnovnykh polozheniy v deystvuyushchem zakonodatel'stve i proekte izmeneniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. ¹ 9. S. 18.
9. Osipenko O. V. Deyatel'nost' docherney kompanii. Kak privlech' osnovnoe obshchestvo k solidarnoy otvetstvennosti // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 68-73.
10. Rayzberg V. A., Lozovskiy L. Sh. Slovar' sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh terminov // M.: Ayris-press, 2008. S. 133.
11. Garmaev A. G., Abtseshko N. V. Litso, kontroliruyushchee kompaniyu. Kak ego privlech' k otvetstvennosti // Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 22-23.
12. Budylin S. V., Ivanets Yu.L. Doktrina snyatiya korporativnoy vuali v zarubezhnykh stranakh i Rossii // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2013. ¹7. S. 80-125.
13. Sychev P. G. Institut sryvaniya korporativnoy vuali: vozmozhnost' primeneniya v rossiyskom sudoproizvodstve // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 21-26.
14. Shitkina I. S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' chlenov organov upravleniya i kontroliruyushchikh lits: realii pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki i tendentsii razvitiya zakonodatel'stva // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 14-26.
15. Yastrebov O. A. Teorii o yuridicheskikh litsakh // Yuridicheskiy mir. 2010. ¹ 5. S. 48-52.
16. Shitkina I. S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' chlenov organov upravleniya khozyaystvennykh obshchestv: klassicheskaya doktrina i sovremennye tendentsii pravoprimeneniya // Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 4-5.
17. Man'kovskiy I. A. Teorii sushchnosti yuridicheskogo litsa: istoriya razvitiya i sovremennye nauchnye podkhody // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. ¹ 4. S. 117-126.
18. Yavorskaya Yu. V. Yuridicheskie litsa: zakonodatel'nye novatsii teorii i sudebnoy praktiki v sovremennoy Rossii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 11-16.
19. Ksenofontov K.E.. Dopustimost' ekspropriatsii sobstvennosti inostrannogo investora prinimayushchim gosudarstvom // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 323-329. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.3.9706.
20. N.S. Kiselev. Preventivnaya zashchita ot reyderskikh atak // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 171-178. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.18.
21. Yu. P. Yur'eva. Korporativnye konflikty v rossiyskikh aktsionernykh obshchestvakh. // Pravo i politika. – 2006. – ¹ 8.
22. K. M. Belikova. Nekotorye problemy zashchity prav aktsionerov v «gruppakh predpriyatiy» v stranakh Latinskoy Ameriki // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 11. – S. 1947-1955.
23. Akhrameeva O.V. Neochevidnye prepyatstviya v dostizhenii tseley ispol'zovaniya obespechitel'nykh mer // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 12.-S.95-113. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.12.10330. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10330.html