|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Malyutin, R.A.
Philosophy and politics: the experience of comparing
methodologies based upon an example of the dialogue
between Alexander Kozhev and Leo Strauss
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 10.
P. 1408-1414.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52069
Malyutin, R.A. Philosophy and politics: the experience of comparing methodologies based upon an example of the dialogue between Alexander Kozhev and Leo StraussAbstract: The article is devoted to the methodological problems of political sciences. Based on an example of the polemics between Leo Strauss and Alexander Kozhev, the author shows the key working methods of modern researchers, and their weak spots. The author also provides analysis of the causes of the problems and potentially productive options for their resolution. The author takes the development of economic sciences as a reference point. The political science has been institutionalized only recently, and it still uses the philosophical vocabulary, that is why its achievements sound archaic compared to achievements of other humanities. The lacking involvement of mathematics, neurosciences, statistics, etc. causes loss and stagnation of knowledge. The typical thesis on power written in the early XXI century rarely differs from the theses, which appeared two to four centuries ago. Esoteric and philosophic tendencies are being criticized as harmful and thwarting further progress. Keywords: literature, criticism, statistics, knowledge, cognition, development of science, methodology, power, philosophy, politics, interdisciplinary studies.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Catherine and Michael Zuckert. The Truth about Leo Strauss. The University of Chicago Press Chicago 2006.
2. Carnap R, Reichenbach H. Erkenntnis / Leipzig, 1930-1931. Bd. 1. Perevod vypolnen A. V. Kezinym i vpervye opublikovan v zhurnale «Vestnik MGU», ser. 7 «Filosofiya», ¹ 6, 1993, s. 11—26. 3. Leo Strauss Persecution and the art of writing. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1988. 4. Leo Strauss Studies in platonic political philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1983. 5. Leo Strauss The city and the man. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1978. 6. Leo Strauss The early writings ( 1921-1932) Translated and edited by Michael Zank. State University of New York Press, New York, 2002. 7. Steven B. Smith Reading Leo Strauss: politics, philosophy Judaism. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006. 8. Adorno Teodor V. Zhargon podlinnosti. O nemetskoy ideologii. Per.: E. V. Borisov M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2011.-191 s. 9. Kozhev Aleksandr. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya i drugie raboty / Per. s fr. – M.: Nauka, 2003. 10. Kollinz Rendall. Sotsiologiya filosofiy. Global'naya teoriya intellektual'nogo izmeneniya / Per. s nem. N.S.Rozova-Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf, 2002. 11. Kun Tomas. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy / Per. s angl. I. Naletov – M.: AST, 2009. 12. Deniel Khausman. Filosofiya ekonomiki. Antologiya. Perevod s angliyskogo N. Avtonomovoy, I. Boldyreva, Yu. Kapturevskogo, P. Klyukina, M. Levinoy, A. Fofonova, M. Sherstneva, M.: Izd. Instituta Gaydara, 2012. — 520 s. 13. Fuko Mishel'. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk / Per. s fr. – M.: A-cad, 2004. 14. Khabermas Yurgen. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie / Per. s nem. S . Shachin, D. Sklyadnev. Pod red. Boris Markov – M.: Nauka, 2006. 15. Shtraus Leo O tiranii / Per. s angl. I drevnegrech. A.A. Rossiusa, per. s frants. A.M. Rutkevicha. – SPb.: Izd-vo S.Peterb. un-ta, 2006. – 328 s |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
