Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Official and informal professional associations of artists in the contemporary art space of Russia and China

Din Zhiwei

Postgraduate student, Department of Art History and Pedagogy of Art, A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University

191186, Russia, Saint Petersburg, nab. Sinks, 48, room 6, room 51

dingzhiwei@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2023.9.44082

EDN:

ZZYRQZ

Received:

20-09-2023


Published:

01-10-2023


Abstract: The article presents an analysis of the activities of formal and informal art associations in the space of contemporary art in Russia and China. The two countries actively cooperate in the field of art, including at the institutional level, which actualizes the appeal to the work of existing creative unions. The object of attention in the framework of the study is the modern art associations of the two countries, and the subject is the relationship between the structure and activities of official and informal art associations of China and Russia. The aim is to analyze the features of the activity of art associations in the conditions of the modern art space of their countries. The analysis of the state and directions of development of both official structures and informal art groups is carried out. The former in both Russia and China, as a rule, are the continuers of the traditions of the former structures, but the original function of the guide of the political course of the leadership of the countries in them remained at different levels, mostly decreasing. The latter are communities of artists who unite by creative interests or around a common exhibition space for them, in particular galleries. Moreover, both forms successfully exist in both states, reflecting the trends of artistic life and at the same time influencing it.


Keywords:

professional art associations, union of artists, art group, contemporary art, russian art, chinese art, gallery of contemporary art, curatorship, the artistic process, art space

This article is automatically translated.

This article attempts to correlate the trends that occur in the environment of official and informal artistic associations of modern China and Russia. The development of cultural contacts, including cooperation between the artistic and creative circles of the two countries, determines the relevance of this kind of research. It is worth noting that attention to the relationship of the art worlds of modern Russia and China has already been undertaken in Russian science. So, among the researchers who disclose this issue, S. Lan [1], T. M. Martinovich [2], H. Zhang [3], S. M. Gracheva [4], L. Yujiu [5], C. Miaojing [6] and others should be mentioned. The activities of China's professional creative unions are put in the focus of attention within the framework of the study by Nizhen Xing, describing the activities of a number of major artistic associations of modern China [7]. Associations of artists in modern Russia are also included in the space of interest of many Russian researchers who study contemporary art. Since art processes do not stand still in the light of various socio-cultural changes, political and economic conditions, transformations also occur in the activities of artist communities, determining the relevance of their study, including at the present stage. In addition, the convergence of the art spaces of Russia and China requires the study of all possible "entry points", especially at the level of art communities.

The correlation of the structure and activities of the official and informal art associations of China and Russia is the subject of the study, and its object is the modern art associations of the two countries. The purpose is to analyze the specifics of the organization and ways of development of art associations in the conditions of modern art space. For this purpose, an overview of the largest communities of Russia and China is given; a description of their exhibition and other activities, methods of positioning concepts are proposed; common features are highlighted and differences are outlined. This is the scope of the publication's tasks. The significance of the research results is due to the fact that they will make it possible to more clearly define the boundaries of the artistic worlds of the two countries and at the same time identify entry points, see possible prospects for cooperation.

Currently, there are associations in the art world of Russia that have a long history, as well as relatively new art groups. The largest, authoritative and mass of them is the creative public organization "Union of Artists of Russia", which functions in the form of regional associations — its structural divisions. This organization was created in Soviet times with the aim of establishing a common artistic and creative line among authors; it united both artists and restorers, art historians and other artists. Now the members of the association, just as before, can receive workshops and orders, participate in various projects, exhibitions, conferences and festivals organized by the union itself or organizations interacting with it. At the same time, at present this association does not dictate to authors how their works should be created and what to talk about, on the contrary, it supports independent creative searches of venerable and young authors, the autonomy of their art. However, membership in the union and the right to exhibit at exhibitions, as a rule, are obtained by those authors who, to one degree or another, continue the artistic traditions of Russian art, including Soviet, pre-revolutionary. The exhibition materials are faithful to the principles of realism, but new forms, means, materials, images are also allowed. This helps to harmoniously enrich the art environment with innovations. Moreover, this process takes place with the obligatory consideration by the regional offices of the peculiarities of the local art space. For example, in the St. Petersburg Union of Artists, as art critic V. A. Ushakov notes, "the choice in favor of realism allowed us to preserve the traditions of genuine Russian realism and a magnificent art school with all the negative sides of ideological pressure" [8, p. 7].

It is noteworthy that the most diverse in terms of artistic associations is the art space of St. Petersburg. This is probably due to the existence of a long tradition of organizing such unions within the city and its special position in the history and geography of Russian art. So, in addition to the regional branch of the Union of Artists, there is the St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists (IFA). Its management and members consider themselves to be continuers of the traditions of the Leningrad City Committee of Graphic Artists [9]. In many ways, this position is due to the fact that the membership mainly includes representatives of the art of the late Soviet period, although there are many young authors. As A. K. Florkovskaya points out, this association combines features of pre-revolutionary institutions and "sociopolitical realities of the last Soviet decades" [10, p. 181]. In many ways, the community was created as an alternative to the Union of Artists of the USSR, since initially it included those artists who were not members of the first and did not want to follow the official line in art. In fact, both organizations have been acting as trade unions for a long time, on the one hand, for those who were loyal to the authorities, and, on the other hand, for those who advocated alternative and free creativity. However, now such a confrontation has leveled off, and both organizations have occupied their niches in the artistic life of St. Petersburg. Although, judging by the artistic material presented at the exhibitions, the St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists is much more active in including art objects created with the help of modern computer and Internet technologies. No wonder it includes a section of "new media".

In St. Petersburg, as in other cities of Soviet Russia, informal groups of artists began to be created. This process in the Leningrad art world began in the 1950s, but noticeably intensified in the 1980s in the wake of the general liberalization of culture. V. B. Krivulin points out that this process took place in connection with the desire of representatives of late non-conformism to "define the limits of intellectual freedom" [11]. Moreover, if Moscow conceptualists were inclined to individualize creative activity and break with traditions, then in the Leningrad-Petersburg environment there was a tendency to unite interests in small art circles and adherence to the principles of the local art school. It was these associations that were the first to enter the art market in the future, legalizing their status. Diverse communities interacted with each other, sometimes uniting around galleries and art spaces, such as the Pushkinskaya-10 center. Among such a circle should now be called the association "Creative Association "Mitki"" (1982), which gave rise to subculture and became part of the "urban folklore". For a long time Mitki collaborated with such groups as Inaki, Alipiy, Ostrov, New Artists, etc. Many of them have already ceased to exist or have been reborn into other communities. Often young authors create art groups, such as, for example, "Art World", consisting of graduates of the St. Petersburg Academy of Arts named after I. E. Repin, "Artika", "Nevsky Artists", "Art Cart", "Firewall", etc. However, due to the change in the creative interests of their members, they may disintegrate, and after them new small communities are formed, which are mainly created as spaces for communication and mutual assistance. It is worth noting that the artists included in them are often members of the Union of Artists and other associations. This practice is typical for other cities of the country.

The artistic life of modern China is a rather complex and contradictory phenomenon, which has a relatively small age. Since the founding of New China in the middle of the XX century, the work of local artists has been regulated in accordance with the political course and ideological positions. The semblance of Soviet socialist realism was everywhere asserted, but in a more romanticized way. Authors who did not agree with such an attitude were repressed or left the borders of the state. The harsh suppression of manifestations of dissent, and, moreover, attempts to organize any circles, groups did not allow the underground to develop until the end of the 1970s.

The Association of Artists of China (1949) became the conductor of the political and ideological course of the Government of the country in the literary and artistic sphere of society. It was the only art association in the country that accumulated artists and artists in its ranks, directing their creative forces to the implementation of state orders. Currently, the association remains the largest union of its kind in the country and retains many of its former functions, but implements them in new conditions. Its goal is to promote innovations in art, to hold major exhibitions, to form the image of China and its style reflecting the spirit of national culture [12]. To do this, meetings, seminars, lectures are constantly organized, exhibitions and competitions are held, which differ in scale.

Meanwhile, the modern art space of the country is an increasingly complex and constantly developing phenomenon. Understanding of this fact led the management of the association to the need for cooperation with other art groups of artists. The Association has set itself a difficult task to unite the widest range of authors, including representatives of informal associations. They can become members of the association, or they can, without being such, take part in the events of a specially created Center for Exhibitions and Promotion of New Literary and Artistic Groups, as well as a Center for Exhibitions and Promotion of Youth Art. These sites were opened in 2018 in order to identify, develop and promote contemporary artists and their communities. In many ways, the appeal to this sector of the Chinese art world is due to the desire to diversify the exhibition material, make it more interesting to the public, take into account the trends of modern art, which is difficult to do due to the appeal to the "classics". Another event that attracts young authors, including those who are not adherents of romantic or symbolic realism supported by the association, is the annual exhibition "Report to the People". Its space shows not epic paintings telling about the struggle of the Chinese people for freedom or the successes of socialist construction, but sketches from the lives of ordinary people, their everyday life, real problems facing the people. Of course, there is no opportunity to show non-classical art here, but adherents of realistic art can find a niche for themselves.

Recently, new associations have begun to emerge in China, in particular the Chinese Association of Contemporary Artists. Its history began in 1996, but it received official status only in 2004. Now it consists of more than two thousand members, as well as almost a thousand applicants for this status. It is an official non-profit organization created on the initiative of the country's artistic circles seeking integration into the global art process. It has emerged as a new, dynamic and authoritative group focused on cultural exchanges in the field of painting and calligraphy. In recent years, the Chinese Association of Contemporary Artists has opened its branches in Yunnan, Shanxi, Shandong and other parts of the country.

It is important to emphasize that, like any official association in China, in its activities there is no hint of provocation or disagreement with the existing policy, as well as the ideological line in art. Unlike the main Association, which focuses on the internal art process, it is focused on positioning the achievements of the culture of the Celestial Empire in the world. To do this, a mandatory part of her work is to conduct theoretical research in the field of art and art criticism, the results of which are published in other countries. To this end, the organization promotes the participation of Chinese specialists in international cultural projects, competitions, conferences. In addition, its platform organizes academic research and events related to cooperation with different regions, including the connections of mainland Chinese artists with representatives of the art world of Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and abroad. This is necessary to raise the level of artists, as well as to promote Chinese art abroad.

The activities of the organization in question have their own nuances. First of all, its members are those artists who belong to other art associations. Within their framework, they "work" for the local artistic life, and the association helps to "go" beyond it, including on the world stage. Moreover, educational and scientific institutions engaged in training in artistic specialties and art studies also participate in the events organized by it. Anyone who studies or creates art related to national specifics, has an art education and has a creative or pedagogical work experience of at least fifteen years can become a member of the Chinese Association of Contemporary Artists. Currently, its activities are focused on organizing large-scale events in different parts of the country and abroad, in which painters and calligraphers take part. These are, first of all, exhibition projects, festivals, master classes.

The Association of Folk Artists is one of the largest and most influential art groups in China, which was formed by theorists and practitioners of ethnic art. In the wake of the search for the "Chinese style" in society, science, and art, interest in everything related to ethnocultural features has increased. In addition, works of Chinese folk art, many crafts have become commercially successful projects. All this became the basis for the organization at the beginning of the XXI century of a National congress in the field of such creativity, at which it was decided to create this organization. The Association helps folk artists, cultural and art figures through craft research, monuments, information exchange and training, which helps to preserve and transmit the cultural traditions of the country to new generations, and also cooperates with similar international art organizations.

Since 2012, the Association of Chinese Women Artists has been working in the art world of China under the auspices of the Ministry of Culture and the All-China Federation of Women. It is a non-profit public organization, which includes artists, art historians, experts and scientists who are interested in promoting Chinese art, united by gender. The creation of this association was due to the desire for cooperation of many informal creative unions of women artists who existed in different parts of the country. Together, they had the opportunity to build a communication platform, organize and conduct exhibition projects together at the official level, initiate research and creative projects related to women's self-realization and the problems that face it. According to the chairman of the association, Kung Tzu, the goal of the organization is to help women artists from all over China create spaces to demonstrate their achievements and improve, develop ties and exchanges with women artists from different countries in the field of culture and art [13].

In modern China, there are a significant number of public non-profit associations of artists with an official status. So, in addition to those mentioned above, there is also the Association of Celebrities of Chinese Painting and Calligraphy, the Association of Calligraphy and Painting of the Elderly, the Overseas Association of Chinese Artists, the Hong Kong Association of Chinese Artists, etc. Literally in every niche occupied by representatives of creative professions, there are certain associations that have quite an official status. The existence of such organizations, their recognition by the authorities, testifies both to the rich art life, which is becoming more complicated day by day, and to the fact that the relationship of contemporary artists with society in China is not fully regulated. For this reason, the art community is in dire need of some kind of intermediaries who would represent the interests of artists in relation to colleagues, the state, the art world outside the country, etc. They also act as spaces for communication and exchange of ideas, experience, and learning, which in other conditions would be difficult for masters living in different provinces of China, often difficult to access, as well as those who work abroad.

In China, in addition to official associations operating from positions approved by the authorities, there are also independent art groups that do not have an official status. Their history began in the 1970s, when a number of authors, in particular Zhao Wenliang, Yang Yushu, Shi Zhenyu and other young artists who advocated the creation of "art for art's sake", and not to support a political course, began to unite in groups such as the "Wu Ming Painting Group", "School Yuuantan Painting", "Star Painting Group", "Unknown Painting Group", etc. They also began to exhibit their works first in private galleries, mainly created by owners from the West, and then at exhibitions of contemporary art in art museums of various levels. Artists refused state support, experimented with traditions, enriching their artistic language with new forms, techniques, materials, including media, installations, videos, preferences, etc. Thus, "Scar Painting", "Rustic Realism", "New Wave", etc. appeared [14, p. 7]. However, the activities of these communities were not of an aggressive provocative nature, but focused on experiments with the art form within the framework of the modernist line in Chinese art. In fact, such groups were founded in order to generate the autonomy of the artistic process. At the first stages, they had no platforms for positioning their creativity, since the system of galleries and museums "worked" for official art, familiar to the masses. In addition, even after the exhibition of contemporary art at the National Art Museum of China in 1989, many exhibitions of such art continued to be sharply criticized. Later, these associations, even after becoming in demand, disintegrated, and the masters were realized by joining official associations, being recognized as "classics", or left their homeland.

At the beginning of the XXI century, representatives of the part of the Chinese art community that advocates the assertion of the autonomy of art, and especially in the light of the rapid rise of the art market, began to focus on creating their own platforms for exhibiting and communication. First of all, galleries, exhibition centers, art spaces and private museums began to be built around foreign collectors and curators, which became the basis for the organization of informal art associations [15, p. 89]. The authors participating in them no longer sought to find recognition in official institutions, including in associations of artists supported by the authorities. Such galleries carefully select the circle of their authors, help them, paying special attention to the quality of exhibition materials. If earlier art groups specialized in installations, video art, and all kinds of art objects, now they create exhibitions that show works related to classical genres and types of art. Art galleries in Shanghai and Beijing, as well as some other cities in China, are implementing programs to support young artists, providing them with institutional assistance to preserve their creative independence. For example, the Rockbound Gallery in Shanghai organizes a competition for the Hugo Boss Asia Art Award, OCAT Shanghai and the Pierre Hubert Award in the field of video art, and PSA implements a training program for young curators.

So, in the art world of China, there are official associations associated with state structures that allow regulating the relations of loyal authors with the authorities, society, colleagues, and foreign institutions in the field of art. There are also unofficial art groups inside the country, which more closely resemble "circles of communication" between authors. They accumulate around galleries, exhibition grounds, art centers, and their members are connected by common views on art, as well as the desire to preserve their independence. Since such associations are not formal organizations, it has no leadership, defined goals, rules, a well-structured model of behavior of participants and the boundaries of their demarcation with those who are not considered such. Often they are connected by informal ties with public associations and even conscientiously participate in projects, organize them. In addition to artists, such communities include curators and art critics who help artists enter the art market.

Similar processes are taking place in the artistic life of modern Russia. An example of this is the fact that since the end of the XX century, associations of artists began to be created, alternative to the activities of the Union of Artists. At the beginning of the XXI century, such communities either acquire an official status, becoming major regulators of processes in the art world of a particular city, or remain at the level of the circle of authors, which exists until such time as joint exhibition activities and sale of works are possible, it is necessary to position their vision in the cultural space of the city. Unlike in China, where informal groups mostly line up around art galleries, in Russia they are formed around workshops and creative teams, in a circle of acquaintances, fellow students, teachers of art universities.

In Russia and China, large official associations are distinguished by polyfunctionality in terms of the composition of participants and areas of activity, while young informal groups are, as a rule, circles of authors who are close in creative interests. The latter are created and function in those creative environments where there is a need for their activities. Moreover, their appearance has a rapid impact on the degree of saturation and meaningful life of the regions, while the influence of official unions is designed for long-term effects and is focused on interaction with various institutions. Both of them help artists in both countries to convey their images to the viewer. The former prefer classical forms, while the latter seek to show their understanding of contemporary art, including rethinking and interpreting the trends that exist in the global art process.

References
1. Lan, S. (2008). Cultural dialogue between Russia and China in the modern world. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 1, 85-87.
2. Martinovich, T. M. (2017). Intercultural interaction between Russia and China in the field of art. Russia and China: history and prospects for cooperation: materials of the VII international scientific and practical conference, Blagoveshchensk. Heihe, May 22-23, 2017. Blagoveshchensk-Heihe: Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University. Issue 7, pp. 560-564.
3. Zhang, H. (2019). Boundaries of the “Xie Yi” style in modern oil painting of China (on the issue of cultural mutual influences between China and Russia). New art history. History, theory and philosophy of art, 2, 64-69.
4. Gracheva, S. M. (2021). Creative mutual influence of contemporary St. Petersburg and Chinese artists. Art of Eurasia, 4(23), 86-101.
5. Yutszyu, L. (2022). Formation of monumental sculpture in Russia and China. Society: philosophy, history, culture, 3, 202-206.
6. Miaojing, Ch. (2023). Analysis of the transformation of the status of contemporary art in Russia and China. Humanitarian, socio-economic and social sciences. Series: Historical Sciences. Culturology. Political sciences. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-transformatsii-statusa-sovremennogo-iskus-stva-v-rossii-i-v-kitae/viewer
7. Xing, N., & Leonova, V. M. (2021). Unions of Chinese artists in the 21st century and their place in the space of contemporary art. ART INNOVATION, 2, 38-57.
8. Ushakova, V. A. (2003). Past and present of the Leningrad-St. Petersburg Union of Artists. Artists to the city. Exhibition for the 70th anniversary of the St. Petersburg Union of Artists. St. Petersburg: Petropol, pp. 7-13.
9. St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists (IFA). Retrieved from https://www.ifaspb.info/
10. Florkovskaya, A.K. (2017). Painting section of the City Graphic Committee as an example of the artistic community of the late Soviet era (1976–1988). Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov: Certificate, 5(79), 181–184.
11. Berg, M. (2021). Radicals and conservatives: two generations of the Russian underground. Gorky – Russian online publication. Retrieved from https://gorky.media/context/radikaly-i-konservatory-dva-pokoleniya-russkogo-andegraunda/
12. Lu Jing, Ding Tao (2019). Association of Chinese Artists: Strive to write the chapter of art of the new era. China Art News. Retrieved from http://art.people.com.cn/n1/2019/1012/c41426-31396960.html
13. Kong Zi, Chairman of the Association of Chinese Women Artists: paintings transcend languages and build a bridge between people (2021). Global Network. Retrieved from https://china.huanqiu.com/article/43NqN6tqCIx
14. Wang Fei (2008). Contemporary art of China in the context of the world artistic process. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of art history Moscow.
15. Bao, D. (2014). Rethinking and practices within the art system: The self-organization of contemporary art in China, 2001-2012. Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 1(1), 83-95.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "Official and informal professional associations of artists in the space of contemporary art in Russia and China" to the journal "Philosophy and Culture", which conducted a study of trends that occur among official and informal artistic associations of modern China and Russia. The author proceeds from the study of this issue from the fact that in Russia and China, large official associations are distinguished by their multifunctionality in terms of the composition of participants and areas of activity, while young informal groups are, as a rule, circles of authors with similar creative interests, which are created and operate in those creative environments where there is a need in their activities. According to the author, their appearance has a rapid impact on the degree of saturation and meaningful life of the regions, while the influence of official unions is designed for long-term effects and is focused on interaction with various institutions. The relevance of the research is determined by the increasing scale of close cultural contacts developing between Russia and China, including in the artistic sphere. The methodological basis was formed by an integrated approach, including general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as descriptive, socio-cultural and comparative analysis. The theoretical basis of the research is the works of such Russian and Chinese art historians as S. Lan, T.M. Martinovich, H. Zhang, S.M. Gracheva, L. Yujiu, C. Miaojing, etc. The empirical base consists of memoirs, memoirs and archival materials on the subject under study. The correlation of the structure and activities of the official and informal art associations of China and Russia is the subject of the study, and its object is the modern art associations of the two countries. The purpose is to analyze the specifics of the organization and ways of development of art associations in the conditions of modern art space. To achieve this goal, the author sets the following tasks: an overview of the largest communities in Russia and China; characteristics of their exhibition and other activities, ways of positioning concepts; highlights common features and outlines differences. The practical significance of the research results lies in the fact that they will make it possible to more clearly define the boundaries of the artistic worlds of the two countries and at the same time identify entry points and see possible prospects for cooperation. Having studied the degree of scientific elaboration of the problem, the author notes a sufficient number of studies that reveal the importance and complexity of the studied problem. Associations of artists in modern Russia are included in the space of interest of many Russian and Chinese researchers who study contemporary art. The author has studied and described in detail both official and informal creative associations of Russian and Chinese artists: the Union of Artists of Russia, the St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists, Mitki, Art Cart, the Chinese Association of Contemporary Artists, the Association of Folk Artists, the Association of Chinese Women Artists, the Wu Ming Painting Group and others. He compared the characteristics of organizations, the characteristics of the creative staff, and the principles of membership. The author pays special attention to the principles of functioning of the associations of artists of the two states. As the author notes, in the art world of China, there are official associations associated with state structures that allow regulating the relations of loyal authors with the government, society, colleagues, and foreign institutions in the field of art. Informal art groups accumulate around galleries, exhibition sites, and art centers, and their members are connected by common views on art, as well as a desire to maintain their independence, therefore, they do not have leadership, defined goals, rules, a clearly structured model of behavior of participants and the boundaries of their demarcation with those who are not considered such. The author notes similar processes in the artistic life of modern Russia: communities either acquire official status, becoming major regulators of processes in the art world of a particular city, or remain at the level of the circle of authors, which exists until such time as joint exhibition activities and sale of works are possible. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the mutual influence of different cultures due to intercultural interaction and the facts of the manifestation of such mutual influence in the subjects of artistic culture is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the research consists of 15 sources, including foreign ones, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the studied problem. The author fulfilled his goal, received certain scientific results that allowed him to summarize the material. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.