Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Russian Ballet and Postmodern Trends

Khisamov Denis Nikolaevich

Postgraduate student, Department of Art History, Theatrical Art Institute of Contemporary Art

121309, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Novozavodskaya, 27A

Khisamovdenis@icloud.com

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2022.10.38730

EDN:

DLIVOD

Received:

07-09-2022


Published:

05-11-2022


Abstract: In this article, Russian ballet is considered from the point of view of the peculiarities of the aesthetics of postmodernism and as one of the brightest manifestations of postmodern culture. The subject of the study is the trends of postmodernism in modern Russian ballet. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that until now, in the scientific research literature, the phenomena of modern ballet have not been subjected to scientific theoretical understanding from the point of view of trends in the aesthetics of postmodernism. It is revealed that a new stage in the development of Russian ballet is associated with the activities of S. Diaghilev's ballet troupe, characterized by a departure from traditions and the formation of a new aesthetic. The study concluded that the development of modern Russian ballet was significantly influenced by such postmodern trends as: the destructurization of the language of classical dance, the desire for syncretism of different types of art in the context of a ballet performance, the use of quotations, allusions and reminiscences that acquire conditional symbolic meaning, the desire for plastic experiments.


Keywords:

russian ballet, modern russian ballet, postmodernism, trends of postmodernism, Sergey Diaghilev, syncretism of postmodern culture, physicality, citation, russian seasons, multicultural phenomenon

This article is automatically translated.

 

introduction

Modern Russian ballet in the history of world culture is a unique phenomenon born at the crossroads of tradition and innovation. From the point of view of art criticism and ballet studies, classical Russian ballet has repeatedly become the object of research. At the same time, the study of the peculiarities of the development of Russian ballet from the standpoint of postmodern aesthetics is just beginning in the context of modern methodological approaches of the humanities – art history, ballet studies, philosophy of art and cultural studies. Russian Russian ballet at the present stage requires identification and generalization of trends and features of the development of Russian ballet in the context of postmodern aesthetics in order to reveal the essence and content of the phenomena of Russian ballet at the present stage. The above has determined the relevance of the topic of the article.

Works devoted to the problems of postmodern aesthetics (A. S. Arkhangelskaya [1], Yu. V. Arkhipova [2], Yu. V. Gavrilova [7], L. I. Gorbunova [8]) played an important role in the study of modern phenomena in the field of ballet in the process of research. Scattered information about certain phenomena of modern Russian ballet is found in a number of articles and studies of a more narrow nature (O. N. Vergnigora [6], O. N. Polisadova [10]). At the same time, there are practically no comprehensive works and studies devoted to the analysis of trends in Russian ballet in the context of the modern socio-cultural situation in the research literature.

The problem of the research is that the Russian ballet, being for several centuries the bearer of the traditions of national culture, today has a diverse, changeable and sometimes contradictory image, which is due to the influence of postmodern aesthetics on the development of this type of art.

The purpose of the study is to study the trends of modern Russian ballet and establish their relationship with the phenomenon of postmodernism.  Russian Russian ballet's objectives were to study the prerequisites and conditions for the formation of postmodern trends in Russian ballet, to characterize the general aesthetic patterns of the aesthetics of culture and art of the XXI century, to theoretically substantiate and analyze postmodern trends in the context of trends in the development of Russian ballet at the present stage. The subject of the study was the modern Russian ballet. 

 

METHODS AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY.

The methodological basis of the presented work is the works of art history that consider the issues of postmodernism in various types of art. For the analysis of the state of modern Russian ballet, both studies of art history and ballet studies are equally important. For the purpose of a comprehensive study of the stated research issues, such research methods as: comparative research method, method of historical analysis, synthesis and generalization were used.

RUSSIAN BALLET – FROM THE BEARER OF NATIONAL TRADITIONS TO A MULTICULTURAL PHENOMENON.

The genre of ballet, formed in the era of Modern times in Europe, as a product of artistic culture reflected the strengthening of the rationalism of the era. Combining the elegance and subtlety of European trends (Europe is distinguished by aestheticism [13, p. 175]), he successfully used a large rational principle to create the basis of great art. At the same time, it was Russia that managed to develop ballet into a great art.

Having undergone significant European influence in all spheres of life in the XVIII century [3], Russian society managed to preserve national identity and self–identification in various spheres of human activity - technical, economic and, especially, cultural. The national mentality and the specific features of the development of national art, manifested in an organic combination of native Russian and European, made up the uniqueness and originality of many cultural phenomena in Russia, including ballet. Russian Russian ballet as an original phenomenon comes to the world stage thanks to the activities of S. P. Diaghilev's troupe and his "Russian Seasons" [12].  Having passed a difficult and long way of moving away from the classical traditions laid down by M. Petipa and the cultivation of creative freedom in the first decades of the twentieth century, at the turn of the XX-XXI century, Russian ballet begins to be dominated by postmodern trends, which is a "multicultural" and experimental phenomenon [9].

It should be noted that ballet, Russian ballet, which has deep historical roots, in its essence cannot contact the phenomena of pseudo-culture, no matter how attractive it still looks. As for postmodernism, with all its achievements, primarily related to openness to innovation, subtle and "comprehensive" experimentation, it often borders on mass culture [10], which has long worried progressive, positive-minded people from the standpoint of the large-scale crisis that it has generated [13]. The "maximum" breadth of the aesthetic view of postmodernists, coupled with a noticeable decrease in the level of responsibility of artists, leads to a kind of inclusion of mass culture in the modern intertext, which cannot be evaluated positively. Russian Russian ballet phenomenon – for example, from the standpoint of the influence of postmodernism – should be considered in the context of a specific Russian tradition, whatever it may be at the present stage. As for the foreign influence on the development of Russian ballet, it, due to its specificity, requires separate consideration.

REFRACTION OF POSTMODERNISM AESTHETICS IN MODERN RUSSIAN BALLET.

The influence of the aesthetics of culture of the XXI century in our country is very noticeable in the field of intellectual and verbal - due to the "textual" nature of postmodernism and the obvious "literature" of Russian culture at its core.  At the same time, postmodernism as a phenomenon correlating with informatization, great dynamics, the variability of society, the "cultural principle" of life, could not but generate an extensive and interesting practice associated with the spirit of the times, its unexpected for many phenomena, hitherto unknown. Ballet as a phenomenon of classical culture, while remaining alive, must respond to the trends of the era, correctly rethinking them, changing under their influence (one way or another, it is real art that is able to fight for progress in a period of total dominance of mass and kitsch). The more important is the combination of traditions and modern trends in the context of the development of ballet in the context of postmodern aesthetics. At the same time, it is necessary to distinguish between phenomena related directly to ballet and those cultural products that were formed by combining ballet and other phenomena that are not related to it.

  However, at the same time, postmodernism as a modern and relevant practice of the existence of society and culture can and should influence various types, genres, styles of art at the level of techniques. It can be said that the main task of experimental creative methods is to enrich the classical line of art development with fresh techniques appropriate to the time. And the freer the society, the more complex and broader the dynamics of the relationship between classical and non-classical lines can be. It is not immediately and not simply comprehended the process of development. Regarding ballet, the increased "physicality" of dance, characteristic, in particular, of foreign art, becomes quite difficult for the audience's perception and evaluation of professionals. It should be noted that, depending on the specific artistic situation, "elements of physicality", as well as various "everyday elements", including those combined with ballet according to the principles of postmodern aesthetics, may well be allowed at the current level of development of the genre. The Russian ballet, developing in line with the rich national culture, tending to realism, lifelike, the versatility of the embodiment of life phenomena through artistic creativity, the organic combination of the most diverse elements, can allow special "inserts" of everyday life, physicality (even their system), without going beyond the edge of taste, beyond its own essence. Such an experience is already connected with the perception of the European art of ballet on the basis of the Russian mentality and attitude and its further specific development in line with our culture [4]. This is one of the tendencies of postmodernism in the context of the development of the genre.

As for the syncretism of phenomena in various forms of cultural art, to which postmodern culture tends as such at its core (reflecting the integrity and universality of human consciousness), the corresponding processes, after "centuries of analyticism", to some extent convenient for the development of culture, enter a new powerful round, which is expressed in particular in an effort to "synthesize the arts", in the interaction, for example, of the principles of different types of art and culture in the context of a finished artistic product, for example, the interpenetration of show and ballet, etc. The latter can be carried out more or less successfully, with a departure from the essence of ballet (but not real art, culture) or in line with that, which we reasonably consider to be a specific art of classical dance. In any case, postmodernism, with its inclusiveness, has not escaped cultural syncretism, therefore, what S. P. Diaghilev did – organically combining into a unique and artistically self–sufficient system, dance, scenic painting, suitable music, a certain presentation within the framework of an image, brand show - postmodernism can carry out much wider, thinner, more "informational" etc. [5, p. 88]. And here, too, there is no "original" fundamental limitation on the part of the essence of ballet. In any case, at least after Diaghilev, in line with modern trends, the unification of arts, various elements, forms of culture in connection with ballet is underway (for example, in the form of a ballet film or a ballet concert with elements of a show). The experience of postmodernism, its principles, can expand, deepen, and detail the field of syncretism – so that modern viewers understand such an artistic language. Based on the above, it follows that in the desire for syncretism of different types of art, another trend of postmodernism in the development of Russian ballet at the present stage is manifested.

In connection with the development of ballet in the modern socio–cultural situation, we can also talk about more specific, well-mastered techniques of allusion, reminiscence - quotation in the broadest sense of the word. These textual features reveal a characteristic trend of the aesthetics of culture of the XXI century. Of course, the above textual references (perhaps modified in a special way) – one ballet in another, one music in another, a famous "gesture" of a famous artist repeated by another artist – will be understood by viewers who understand ballet. Moreover, it is possible, complementing, enriching the artistic fabric of a ballet work, its presentation, in accordance with the nature of the images, their system, to use "inserts" and not from ballets and not even from the field of music. These can be "gestures" of famous people, played–out movements of characters in films (or books), iconic video frames, "just words" - sounding or visualized. Here, of course, the principle of cultural syncretism can also manifest itself. We do not think that this will necessarily happen with the transformation of the essence of ballet. Depending on the degree of talent, outlook, modernity, professionalism of the director and his team, the principles of postmodernism associated with citations can be very widely and truly effectively used in a ballet performance.

conclusions

Thus, at the present stage of the existence of Russian ballet, one of the vectors of its development is determined by postmodern trends, which include: the destructurization of the language of classical dance, the desire for syncretism of different types of art in the context of a ballet performance, the use of quotations, allusions and reminiscences that acquire a conditionally symbolic meaning, the desire for plastic experiments. Russian Russian ballet's distinctive feature in the context of modern aesthetics is its unshakable reliance on classical traditions, which reveals the uniqueness and originality of Russian postmodern ballet. Each of the identified trends, to one degree or another, receives an individual implementation in the context of modern director's ballet, represented in the activities of a galaxy of original Russian directors – Pavel Glukhov, Vladimir Barnava, Taras Burnashev, Alexander Pepelyaev, Vyacheslav Samodurov and others.

References
1. Arkhangelsk A. S. The future of syncretism? (on the question of the style of thinking) // Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology. 2011, No. 2. pp. 3-11
2. Arkhipova Yu. V. Syncretism in the structure of culture: dis. ... cand. philos. Sciences: 09.00.13 Saratov, 2005. – 145 p.
3. Bazhenova T. P., Semina V. S. The essence of Europeanization of Russian culture / T. P. Bazhenova, V. S. Semina // Analitika kulturologii. 2008, No. 10. – pp. 174-185
4. Bakhrushin Yu. A. History of Russian ballet: textbook for universities / Yu. A. Bakhrushin. — M.: Yurayt, 2017. – 275 p.
5. Batsan A. S. "Russian seasons" by S. P. Diaghilev in the context of synthesis of arts // Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. 2012, No. 5 (49). – pp. 86-89
6. Vernigora O. N., Golubev D. V. From show ballet to modern dance theater// Scientific notes (Altai State Academy of Culture and Arts). 2018, No. 4 (18). pp. 129 – 135
7. Gavrilova Yu. V. Syncretism as a factor of formation and evolution of social reality // Humanitarian vector. Series: Philosophy, Cultural Studies. 2015, No. 2 (42). pp. 29-34
8. Gorbunova L. I. Postmodernity as a trend in the development of culture of the XX century // Bulletin of the Murmansk State Technical University. 2011, No. 2. pp. 265-271
9. Zemtsov Yu. N. Spiritual crisis: causes, dynamics, consequences // Modern aspects of humanitarian knowledge: Materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference / edited by O. V. Grigorenko. Voronezh: CPI "Scientific Book", 2017. pp. 32-36
10. Polisadova O. N. "Russian Seasons" by Sergei Diaghilev as an artistic paradigm for the development of ballet art of the twentieth century // Culturology and art history: materials of the I Intern. scientific conf. (Perm, April 2015). Perm: Zebra, 2015. – pp. 71–77
11. Trifonova E. Beauty in Russian: how Diaghilev secured the invasion of Europe // Tsargrad – [electronic resource] – Access mode: https://tsargrad.tv/articles/krasota-po-russki-kak-djagilev-obespechil-vtorzhenie-v-evropu_213079. Date of application: 06.07.2022.
12. Fromm E. To have or to be? Kiev: Nika-Center, 1998. – 400 p.
13. Yakovlev D. E. Ways of aestheticism // Philosophy and Society. 2002, No. 3 (28) – [electronic resource] – Access mode: https://www.socionauki.ru. Date of application: 07.07.2022

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The journal "Philosophy and Culture" presents an article "Russian Ballet and postmodernism trends". Russian Russian ballet In the context of the relevance and necessity of understanding the processes of development of modern ballet theater, the author's position is especially relevant: "In order to reveal the essence and content of the phenomena of Russian ballet at the present stage, it is necessary to identify and generalize the trends and features of the development of Russian ballet in the context of postmodern aesthetics." The purpose of the study – "to study the trends of modern Russian ballet and establish their relationship with the phenomena of postmodernism" – also seems promising, opening up opportunities for research from interdisciplinary positions. Unfortunately, one cannot agree with the author's definition of the subject of the study – "modern Russian ballet" is rather its object. But the methodology is clearly and succinctly defined: "in order to comprehensively study the stated research issues, such research methods as the comparative research method, the method of historical analysis, synthesis and generalization were used." The main thing is how effectively the author applied all these methods in the research process. The content of the article consists of an introduction, two sections and conclusions. It should be noted that such a structure is more suitable for a different type of research work than for an analytical article. But the main disadvantage of the work is the lack of specificity and detail in it. The main part of it, consisting of generalizations, does not contain any examples of performances, nor an analysis of the choreographers' creativity, confirming or refuting the author's point of view. In other words, unfortunately, the main part of the presented article can only be called a preamble. The same thesis applies to the CONCLUSIONS, where the author again summarizes considerations not supported by his own research: "Thus, at the present stage of the existence of Russian ballet, one of the vectors of its development is determined by postmodern trends, which include: the destructurization of the language of classical dance, the desire for syncretism of different types of art in the context of ballet performance, the use of quotations, allusions and reminiscences that acquire a conditionally symbolic meaning, the desire for plastic experiments. Russians Russian ballet's distinctive feature in the context of modern aesthetics is its unshakeable reliance on classical traditions, which reveals the uniqueness and originality of Russian ballet of postmodernism." Alas, within the framework of this article, the author does not present convincing grounds for his theory. Only in the final sentence of the work are the names of modern Russian choreographers named. It is logical to assume that an analysis of their work should follow, which could ensure the scientific novelty of the research. The style of presentation of the material seems competent and sufficiently scientific, with the caveat that the author needs to edit the text and correct the typos encountered ("interrelations with the phenomenon of postmodernism", "one of their trends"). The bibliography of the article consists of thirteen positions, is designed correctly, and includes the main sources on the topic. However, it is necessary to emphasize the absence of foreign sources, as well as studies published over the past three years. The appeal to the opponents is convincing. Unfortunately, within the framework of this article, the author failed to solve the identified problem and achieve his goal – to study the trends of modern Russian ballet and establish their relationship with the phenomena of postmodernism. It is worth emphasizing here that the analytical article is an independent completed study, the process of which is described in the text. Considering all of the above, the article can apply for publication only after revision. There is no doubt that in this case the article will be able to arouse the interest of a wide variety of readers – art historians, practitioners and theorists of ballet art (students, teachers, artists and choreographers), as well as all those interested in modern ballet.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study, as defined by its author – "modern Russian ballet", is considered from the position of determining the role of elements of postmodern aesthetics in the development of the Russian ballet tradition at the beginning of the XXI century. Despite the vagueness and uncertainty of a number of concepts used by the author (culture, art, tradition), the article polemically addresses the problem of the relationship between tradition and innovation on the example of the aesthetics of modern ballet art in Russia. The author does not resort to analyzing specific statements, emphasizing the importance of generalizations, but in this regard it is important to unambiguously define the basic concepts in order to avoid incorrect, distorting the author's thought of readers' interpretations. For example, the author repeatedly uses the widespread "pseudo-theoretical simulacrum" ("in different types of cultural art", "principles of different types of art and culture", "not real art, culture"), assuming that these "winged" words, devoid of theoretical meaning, have some well-known meaning. To give the terms used meanings, they must be conceptualized or given to the reader with reference to the conceptual work of colleagues, which will significantly overload the presented polemical essay, reducing its merits to some extent. It would be more correct to try to avoid the use of ambiguous terminology, paying more attention to the concepts without which the article as a whole loses its relevance. Russian Russian ballet tradition, the essence of Russian ballet, are the most essential elements of the author's narrative. They must be given with reference to theoretical grounds (to be founded) in order to emphasize the author's position, which consists in the statement that its essence does not change from penetration into the tradition of postmodern expressive elements. Russian Russian ballet's research methodology, logically built around the subjectivation (author's understanding) of the transformations taking place in modern Russian ballet, generally meets the purpose of the study – the actualization of "the essence and content of the phenomena of Russian ballet at the present stage", requiring the identification and generalization of "trends and features of the development of Russian ballet in the context of postmodern aesthetics." The philosophical and polemical method of theorizing chosen by the author is justified and supported by comparative historical generalizations. Although the author's attempt at typology (Petipa – Diaghilev is a group of modern Russian directors) needs further development and clarification, since it very conditionally and metaphorically defines the relationship of stylistic epochs. Russian Russian ballet's relevance is presented quite convincingly by the author: "In order to reveal the essence and content of the phenomena of Russian ballet at the present stage, it is necessary to identify and generalize the trends and features of the development of Russian ballet in the context of postmodern aesthetics." Indeed, there is a certain vacuum, a shortage of philosophical works on the impact of transformations of mass consciousness on the practice of preserving traditions. And classical Russian ballet, which became a kind of brand for achieving the socialist system in the Soviet era, is a very good example for philosophical and aesthetic generalizations. Scientific novelty is present in the work. The author polemically problematizes the question of the possibility of preserving tradition by including in it elements of artistic expression peculiar and understandable to the modern era. In this particular case, regardless of empirical examples, the most striking postmodern techniques (the destructurization of the language of classical dance, syncretism of art forms, citationism, allusions and reminiscences, plastic experiments, actualization of physicality, etc.) are considered in the context of the essence of Russian ballet. The style, in general, corresponds to the scientific one, although there are shortcomings that should be eliminated (dots are not placed after the title of the section; years and centuries should be shortened, as required by the editorial board; terms introduced into narratives should be explained or references should be given to literature explaining the context of use; "theoretical simulacra" should be avoided). The structure of the article corresponds to the volume of content and genre of a short philosophical and polemical essay, revealing the author's position within the framework of current theoretical discourse. There are also some comments on the content of the test (for example, the statement "textual features reveal a characteristic tendency" is meaningless due to incorrect coordination). The bibliography reflects the problem area, although it could be much broader if the academic norm of mandatory foundation of the terminology used is observed. In addition, the complete absence of references to foreign scientific literature over the past 5 years is surprising, but the aesthetics of postmodernism remains one of the trends of Western theorists. The design of the descriptions also requires revision in accordance with the requirements of the editorial board. An appeal to opponents is correct and, in principle, sufficient to reveal the author's thought. Although a review of recent publications by foreign authors or discussions with individual foreign colleagues would significantly enhance the academic status of the publication. The author concerns one of the most relevant areas of modern aesthetic and philosophical discourse. Therefore, the readership of the journal "Philosophy and Culture" will undoubtedly be interested in the article, provided that the material is finalized according to the reviewer's comments.