Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Modern models of human resource management and their impact on the realization of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees

Alieva El'vira Sabirovna

Postgraduate Student, Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Youth Work, Smolensk State University

214000, Russia, Smolenskaya oblast', g. Smolensk, ul. Przheval'skogo, 4

alievaelv@rambler.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2022.7.38348

EDN:

LNKZTC

Received:

28-06-2022


Published:

05-08-2022


Abstract: The article describes some modern models of human resource management. The problem of the influence of these models on the realization of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees is considered. The analysis of a number of management models is based on the idea that when building a modern model adapted to the specifics of the organization, it is necessary to generalize and apply the research and achievements of leading foreign and domestic specialists in the field of HR management. The emphasis is on trying to understand how previously developed models are applicable to implementation in a modern environment. It is noted that today most companies are in need of ready-made modern models of human resource management, .   especially in a crisis situation. The absence of a certain conceptual management model leads to the fact that the organization is unable to promptly take the necessary actions to get out of problematic situations or crisis, which becomes a source of recurrence of such problems, generates failures in the functioning of the organization. It is emphasized that the use of such modern models of human resource management will allow companies not only to successfully resist the constantly changing socio-economic and socio-political conditions of functioning, but also to predict them, as well as to use the potential of these models for the prevention and prevention of possible failures of human resource management.


Keywords:

social management, management models, human resource management, management technologies, social engineering, HR management, HR technologies, crisis, forecasting, organization staff

This article is automatically translated.

The development and analysis of management models, as well as the modeling process itself, are an obligatory part of the management process, as this greatly facilitates the work of the organization and communication between its members. Today, many progressive companies face the problem of creating a competent human resource management model that would allow the company to always meet the constantly changing market environment. Modern management models in HR management relate directly to the structural aspect of the process. At the same time, it is important to understand that the very concept of "Management model" implies a whole system of interrelated actions, tools and operations, which constitute the whole essence of the human resource management process. 

The study of the theory and practice of the process of building human resource management models in foreign and domestic experience proves the existence of a huge number of management models. Traditionally, American and Japanese management schools are distinguished, which are a kind of models for the implementation of management systems in various countries with their own socio-cultural specifics. The similarity of the American and Japanese management schools is also in the use of a set of measures to increase the effectiveness of the human factor in the company's activities. The specificity of the American approach consists in attempts to select employees with creative potential, in the use of mechanisms aimed at developing the ability to make decisions independently, act in conditions of innovation and high competition [1, 5, 6]. In the Japanese model, the emphasis is on the family principle of building labor relations, which does not exclude the use of knowledge management mechanisms, development of creative potential of employees [7-10].

When building a modern model adapted to the specifics of the organization, it is certainly necessary to generalize and apply the research and achievements of leading foreign and domestic specialists in the field of HR management. It is extremely important to understand how previously developed models are applicable to implementation in a modern environment. Let's consider some modern models from the point of view of their focus on the qualitative and full realization of the creative and labor potential of employees to achieve the economic success of the company in general, as well as to meet the individual needs of each employee individually.

Figure 1 shows the human resource management model, which was created by a group of foreign researchers, namely Velesko S.E., Byalyatsky N.P., Peter Roish [1].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Figure 1 - Human resource management model of the organization. Byalyatsky N.P., Velesko S.E., Peter Roish

 

This model initially has a number of disadvantages:

– firstly, at first glance, the Velesko, Bialiatski and Roish model is universal and can be applied to absolutely any organization. However, there is a complete lack of focus on crisis situations, so you can not count on the effectiveness of this model "in its pure form" without improvements taking into account the specifics of a particular company;

– secondly, the model is static, since there are no connections between its elements, there is no interdependence;

– thirdly, there is a discrepancy between the set of tasks on the left side, and the tools to achieve them on the right. For example, it is not possible to fully ensure effective control only through business communication.

In Russia today, there is still no consensus: to use foreign management models or to develop their own, taking into account Russian specifics. Of course, this issue is controversial: foreign experience was formed on the basis of a foreign mentality and traditions, and therefore requires detailed study. Undoubtedly, Russia has personal experience in the management process. However, the main features still relate to the remnants of the Soviet period, which are not relevant today in working with modern commercial organizations.

The second modern model of human resource management is proposed by A.Y. Kibanov, a well-known Russian scientist in the field of management [2].

In this model, Figure 2 reveals all the most important actions of the higher personnel management apparatus, which distinguishes it from the first one. At the same time, Kibanov's model is largely focused on the management and control of ordinary employees, and in the same way as in the previous model, the presence of possible crisis situations in the organization is not taken into account.

Îïèñàíèå: C:UsersïðèâåòÀíäðåéDesktopÑÊÐÈÍÛÍîâàÿ ïàïêàIMG_0875.png

Figure 2 - A.Ya Kibanova Human Resource Management model

The two models considered do not fully take into account the peculiarities of the development of professional and creative potential of employees, especially taking into account possible crisis situations. But it is precisely the possibility of countering crisis phenomena both within the organization and external to the company of genesis that testifies to the level of professionalism of employees and the ability to be creative in unusual, and possibly extraordinary conditions. In particular, A.Ya Kibanov's model contains two significant points. The first is the construction of a motivational management mechanism, the second is the analysis of the dynamics of personnel development. However, these generalized components of the model require specification, since the development of motivational impact, as well as the development of personnel, may well be implemented within the framework of certain traditional standards that leave no space for real professional and creative implementation.

The main goal in developing a modern management model in the crisis conditions of globalization, digitalization of society and constant competition is to be able to competently select and justify the basic set of management tools that the company can use to overcome crisis situations and comfortable existence in a modern market environment.

Collecting, generalizing and studying the experience of human resource management on the example of organizations, as well as existing scientific theoretical and practical developments in this field, allowed us to create an author's model of human resource management of a commercial organization. Figure 3 shows the most important management tools, the proper application of which can help in solving emerging problems, problems and crisis situations in a constantly changing management process. This model will be most effective for companies that are in unfavorable or particularly competitive business conditions.

 

Figure 3 - Human resource management model of the organization

 in a crisis situation

 

The model presented above allows you to clearly see the goals of overcoming the crisis situation in the organization, and also highlights specific stages and indicates the structural unit responsible for this or that action within the plan. The advantage of this management model is the ability to trace the relationship between departments, which in future work will avoid the irrational use of the organization's resources, working time and duplication of responsibilities.

The most important element of this model is the definition of a goal and a set of tasks that will contribute to the development of the organization and overcome problematic moments in the work. It is precisely in specific goals and a clear statement of tasks, as well as in the coordination of the activities of each structural unit, that the basis for a successful exit from any crisis period lies. 

Thus, a significant advantage of this model in comparison with the previous ones is the presence of rational, employee-aware goals and objectives of the activity. This component allows not only to reduce the risks of disorganization in professional activity, but also creates the basis for creativity. If the goals and objectives are blurred, and there is no real interaction between employees or structural divisions of the company, then there is no need to talk about the prospects for improving work efficiency and creativity. 

The degree of realization of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees as the most important factor of its efficiency and competitiveness largely depends on the effectiveness of the management model. It is interesting to use a process approach that allows you to optimize the human resource management system, making it consistent and transparent at all levels. 

The process approach in modern management models allows us to develop the potential of the company's employees, both creative and labor. It makes it possible to purposefully and consistently implement interrelated elements of the HR model, as a result forming a continuous process that consists of concretized managerial functions and technologies, HR methods and tools, on the basis of which it becomes possible to most clearly and concretely orient the work of the modern HRM model to the result. 

To date, the most interesting is the HRM model and the development of the potential of the organization's personnel based on the PDCA cycle. In addition to the elements shown in Figure 4, this model often includes management functions such as monitoring results and corrective actions. In the case of the formation of the labor and creative potential of the company's employees, it is better to start with the process of evaluating it. Using this model, it is possible to formulate and concretize the process of forming the labor and creative potential of employees.

 

 

Figure 4 - Human resource management model of an organization based on the PDCA cycle

 

This model of human resource management provides an opportunity to get answers to questions that are largely related to the functioning of the HR system of the company as a whole.  Also, when developing a management model to increase the potential of the company's employees, specialists often rely on factors such as the organization's management system as a whole, resource allocation, modern HRM technologies, all of which affect the increase of creative and labor potential.

The development of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees is one of the most important elements of building a modern HRM model, directly affecting the competitiveness and efficiency of the organization. Using the methodology of the process approach, it is possible to really increase the transparency of the HR system and influence the manageability of this area. As a result, the company can get an effective model for making managerial decisions in the process of developing the labor and creative potential of employees. 

This model is more focused on the organization of work with personnel. It does not seem to have links with structural elements and processes of organizational activity, but this can be considered as a positive moment. The indisputable advantage of this model is the presence of such a component as setting goals and ways to achieve them, training employees, analyzing deviations and working to eliminate their causes. It is the possibility of "working on mistakes" that means that the learning process is continuous, which means that prerequisites are created for the realization of the professional and creative potential of employees.

Today, most companies need ready-made modern models of human resource management, especially in times of crisis. The lack of a competent management model subsequently leads to the fact that the organization cannot urgently take the necessary actions to get out of problematic situations or crisis, which ultimately guarantees an increase in the risk of repetition of such problems [3]. In our opinion, the most attractive is the human resource management model of the organization based on the PDCA cycle, which is due to the need to establish links between the tasks and the result. There is still a gap for initiative and the development of intra-entrepreneurship. The use of such modern models of human resource management will allow companies not only to successfully withstand constantly changing market conditions, but also to predict and even warn them in the future.

 

References
1. Armstrong M. (2010) Human resource management practice. St. Petersburg: Peter.
2. Byalyatsky N.P., Velesko S.E., Peter Roish (2018) Personnel management. MN.: Ecoprospect.
3. Kibanov A.Ya. (2015) Personnel management of the organization. M.: INFRA-M.
4. Morgunov E.B. (2016) Personnel management. Research, assessment, training. M.: Yurayt.
5. Weinberg R. B., Mathis R. L., Cherrington D.C. (1991) Human Resource Certification Institute Certification Study Guide (Alexandria, VA: Human Resource Certification Institute).
6. Cenzo D. A., Robbins S. P. (2009) Fundamentals of Human Resource Management 10th edition, Wiley.
7. Darizhapov B.D. (2002) Review of foreign models of personnel management. Izvestiya Baykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1, 91-95.
8. Lunev A.P., Mineva O.K. (2008) Comparison of European and Japanese experience of personnel management. Humanitarian studies, 4, 213-215.
9. Potemkin V.K. (2010) Personnel management. St. Petersburg.: Peter.
10. Byalyatsky N.P. (2010) Personnel management. M.: Modern School.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the peer-reviewed article "Modern models of human resource management and their impact on the realization of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees", the subject of the study is the human resource management model. The purpose of the study is to build a modern model of human resource management, contributing to the adaptation of the organization to modern conditions and the realization of the creative and labor potential of employees to achieve its economic success. The research methodology is based on a critical analysis of the theory and practice of the process of building human resource management models in foreign and domestic experience. The paper analyzes two models of human resource management of an organization: the domestic one proposed by A.Ya. Kibanov. foreign, "developed" according to the author(s) N.P. Byalyatsky, S.E. Velesko, P. Roisha. (Although the latter statement is not justified, these authors only systematized foreign experience). When developing the author's model, there is an appeal to the process approach, which allows optimizing the human resource management system, making it consistent and transparent at all levels. In this paper, the human resource management model is supposed to be based on the Deming-Shewhart cycle (PDCA). Today, it is extremely important to maximize the effective use of human resources to increase the competitiveness and efficiency of the organization in modern conditions. The task of modern management is not only to meet the needs of employees who work and perform their functions, but also to give a person the opportunity to show their labor and creative potential. The relevance of the topic of the article is due to the fact that despite the fact that managers actively use certain models of human resource management, enterprises continue to search for a more adequate model of human resource management. The scientific novelty of the publication consists in an attempt to substantiate the thesis that the development of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees is one of the most important elements of building a modern model of human resource management, which directly affects the competitiveness and efficiency of the organization. The author(s) believes that they have proposed an effective model for making managerial decisions in the process of developing the labor and creative potential of employees. But the presented schemes and their explanation do not answer the question: how and by what means will the proposed model of human resource management affect the realization of the creative and labor potential of employees of this organization? The conclusions formulated in the article meet the objectives of the stated research, but do not have sufficient justification in terms of the fact that the proposed model will contribute to the development of the labor and creative potential of employees. In general, the content part meets the requirements of the scientific text. This publication is characterized by general structuring, consistency of presentation, but suffers in terms of design (in particular, links to figures in the text do not coincide with their numbering). The bibliography is poorly presented. The work provides links to only 3 sources. Thus, there is no appeal to the main opponents from the area under consideration. In addition, the bibliography is not designed according to the requirements of the journal. Conclusion: The article "Modern models of human resource management and their impact on the realization of the creative and labor potential of the company's employees" has scientific and practical significance. It will be of interest to specialists in the field of management sociology. The work can be published after completion.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The topic raised in the article is undoubtedly relevant and quite significant for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge – as before, the trend of human resource management remains one of the key ones in understanding the effectiveness of organizational culture and management of an organization or enterprise. The author correctly grasped this trend of scientific interest, and in the way he formulated the topic of his research, there is a clear understanding of the problem. In this formulation of the problem, there is also a well-defined way to solve it, therefore, the author has all the possibilities to realize his research goal and its corresponding tasks. Meanwhile, referring to the content of the presented article, we draw attention to the fact that the author took the path of theorizing and refused the opportunity at this stage to conduct an empirical study that could show how effective the human resource management models proposed in the article can be or, conversely, do not have effectiveness. There are very few grounds for theorizing in this case – the problem is not solved only at this level of research, there is an important solid empirical base here, which the author, unfortunately, does not have. What are we observing? As already mentioned, human resource management models are proposed. Modeling itself is a complex process, any model must correspond to the correlation of the input data at the stage of model justification and the final results, which are determined based on estimates of the effectiveness of the model. But even if the author is not ready to present empirical results that would form the basis of modeling, what is proposed instead? Some models created by other authors are mentioned. Strangely, the author does not explain his choice in any way – it seems that these models are simply pulled out of some context and that's all. An explanation is needed – where this model came from, why the author includes it in his work, and finally, what it allows us to understand. It is necessary to evaluate the heuristic value of this model, etc. The author seriously limited himself in this analysis, presenting only the shortcomings, for example, of the first model of human resource management. Doesn't she have any advantages? And in this case, should you start your work by mentioning models that may not correspond to the real state of affairs in the field of human resource management? I don't think this is the right move. He sets the tone for the whole work. But even if the author instructs at this point, another equally important question arises: what are the author's interpretations of these models based on? Just based on your own subjective idea? Alas, this is clearly not enough for a full-fledged analysis of the problem. And the author should understand this perfectly well. In addition, no connection is established at all between the different models presented in the article, as if they function by themselves in the context of the work, and the author only describes them, or rather, gives his vision of their properties and features. In this case, the scientific value of the entire work is extremely low, because I can also give my own interpretation to the material that is contained or reflected in the models presented by the author of the article – but do I have the right to do so? Probably only if I give reasons for the direction in which I will analyze this material and answer the question: why is it necessary in principle. As you can see, many questions arise to the author, and with them grow claims to the scientific side of the study. It is abstract, not analytical, superficial, not convincing, finally. It is not clear in what methodological range these models of human resource management are considered, what purpose does the author pursue for this? And finally, the most difficult thing: the author did not show at all how these models affect the realization of the creative potential of the company's employees, but this point is stated in the title of the work. The rather old literature, the lack of attributes of scientific research (analysis of key concepts, analysis of scientific discourse on the topic, definition of methodological foundations, etc.), as well as the modesty of the results do not yet allow us to recommend the article for publication. Serious and slow processing is needed. Comments of the editor-in-chief dated 08/03/2022: " The author has finalized the material. The revised manuscript is recommended for publication."