Kukuev E.A., Dzida N.N., Buzolina A.N., Volosnikova L.M. —
Analysis of the educational needs of foreign students in the context of educational design
// Pedagogy and education. – 2023. – ¹ 4.
– P. 152 - 170.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2023.4.69330
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/ppmag/article_69330.html
Read the article
Abstract: The subject of this study is the educational needs of foreign students, the consideration of which should determine the design of education. Special attention is paid to cultural, educational, pedagogical, social, household and communicative aspects. The differences between the samples of first- and second-year foreign students for the construction of individual educational trajectories are analyzed. Special attention is paid to the relationship with a female teacher and a male teacher. The nature of relations among students is analyzed. The groups of needs of first- and second-year foreign students are structured.
In the empirical part of the study, a survey in the form of a questionnaire was used. The questions were formulated in accordance with the chosen theoretical model of adaptation. In order to increase the objectivity of the results obtained, the question of nationality was removed from the questions about personal data. The questionnaire was written in Russian and English. The results were processed using the statistical software package SPSS-23.0.
The main conclusions of the study are: in the second year of study, it is necessary not to reduce, but to activate tutor support. Insufficient awareness of students about the country of study is noticed. The urgency of the need for closer communication with your family is revealed. A high level of evaluation of relationships with teachers is needed. Foreign students are positive about interaction, but psychologically they do not fully realize it. For first-year students, the Russian language is important and therefore the sphere of communication and possible problems due to differences are updated. For foreign students of the second year of study, the fact of integration into the socio-cultural and educational environment of Russia is relevant.
Kukuev E.A., Volosnikova L.M., Ogorodnova O.V., Elantseva S.A. —
Resource Assessment and Inclusion Risks: Students' View
// Pedagogy and education. – 2023. – ¹ 1.
– P. 17 - 29.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2023.1.39971
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/ppmag/article_39971.html
Read the article
Abstract: The study aims to analyze the resources and risks of inclusion in a comprehensive school from the point of view of students. The authors proceed from the position that one of the criteria of inclusivity can be the subjective well-being of students, as a direct integrative assessment of satisfaction and positive emotions. Therefore, it is important to analyze the student's position (voice) in assessing inclusive educational processes in schools. In 2021, a continuous survey of students from one school in the city of Tyumen was conducted. The sample consisted of 807 students. The study was conducted using the author's questionnaire. The questionnaire of the international research project on the study of the subjective well—being of children "Detsky Mir" - Children'S WORLD and inclusion indicators (Booth, T. Einscow, M.) is taken as a basis. The statistical software package SPSS-23.0 was used for statistical analysis. The analysis made it possible to identify the risks of inclusion that must be taken into account when organizing and implementing the educational process, insufficient level of satisfaction with school as a component of subjective well-being; a tendency to decrease school satisfaction during the transition from 7th to 11th grades; significantly lower grades of all components of subjective well-being by students with OOP; significantly lower grades of all components of inclusion in students with OOP. The survey revealed the inclusion resources in the school under study: satisfaction with friends, family, yourself and your life prospects; high appreciation of inclusive culture at school.
Kukuev E.A. —
Ridigity of Subjects of Education
// Psychologist. – 2014. – ¹ 4.
– P. 96 - 125.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2014.4.12796
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_12796.html
Read the article
Abstract: In article results of empirical research of subjects of the education conducted in March-April, 2014 are analyzed. Selection was made by teachers of schools, teachers of higher education institution, graduates of schools, college and higher education institution. As object of research the rigidnost of subjects of education acted. The associativity of concepts openness/closeness – a rigidnost is analyzed. The parallel between openness of the person and his relation to innovations is drawn. On the basis of the dispersive analysis conclusions about a ratio of a rigidnost of teachers and a rigidnost of the being trained are drawn; communication of a rigidnost of subjects of education and the accommodation district (city/village), steps of education (school-college-higher education institution) is investigated. The technique acted as diagnostic tools "A Tomsk questionnaire of a rigidnost of G.V.Zalevsky" (TORZ). This technique allows to draw a conclusion not only on a rigidnost of the person, but also to analyse its compound components. As a whole the analysis is carried out on 8 scales: 1 . Scale of the general rigidnost; 2 . Subscale of an actual rigidnost; 3 . Scale of a sensitive rigidnost; 4 . Scale of an adjusting rigidnost. 5 . Rigidnost scale as states. 6 . Scale of a premorbidny rigidnost. 7 . Reality scale. 8 . Lie scale. Empirical research of a rigidnost of subjects of education allows to draw the following conclusions:1 . On all components of a rigidnost (TORZ) significant distinctions are received. In particular, at teachers level of a rigidnost is higher on four components (from six): general rigidnost (000); actual rigidnost (000); sensitive rigidnost (010); rigidnost as state (000).2 . The Rigidnost of subjects of education isn't connected with the district of their accommodation (city/village).3 . The hypothesis that "the rigidnost of graduates of educational institutions isn't connected with a step of education (school-college-higher education institution)" received confirmation partially. That is, statistically significant distinctions between selections were shown on scales: sensitive rigidnost (043); premorbidny rigidnost (017). Thus, selection "school students" on all scales showed the lowest points on rigidnost components. That on the one hand it is possible to characterize positively: school students are most open for the changes happening in their life. On the other hand, raises a question of influence of post-secondary education on formation of the fixed forms of behavior.Thus it should be noted that this analysis is considered as primary. The received results have to be put in a formulation of the following hypotheses, so and research continuation. Declared system approach demands the analysis of a phenomenon of openness in system of the interconnected features of the person, as allows to come nearer, in particular, to disclosure "the nature and mechanisms of innovative behavior" that is especially important in an education system.