Abstract: The subject of this study is the correlation of the type of life scenario of the individual on the one hand and the components of the personality on the other. The aim of the research is to analyze the relationship between archetypal structures of the personality and his/hers life scenario. Considering the life scenario of the person and archetypal structures of his/her personality as components of the outlook, projected at the level of semantics in the form of attitudes to individual objects, situations and time intervals, the author compares the type of life scenario of the person on the one hand and the categorical axes of the archetypal space on the other. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that within the framework of this work, for the first time, the relationship between the types of the life scenario of the individual and the components of his/her archetypal space is empirically investigated. In addition, the novelty of the study lies in the fact that archetypal structures and the life scenario of a personality are considered in the framework of this study from the standpoint of the psychology of subjective semantics and are described as deep semantic structures that manifest themselves at the level of surface structures in the processes of meaning formation. In the course of the study, statistically significant data were obtained, indicating the presence of the conjugacy of the axes of the archetypal space and the type of life scenario of the individual

Abstract:  
The matter under research is intrapersonal and interpersonal semantic structures relevant to the definition of archetype. The author carries out comparative analysis of archetype models described in psychology, cultural studies and philosophy as well as models of meanings used in the psychology of subjective semantics and psychology of meaning. When describing intrapersonal archetype structures, the author compares the image of the world model offered by P. Serkin and the archetypic personality space concept given by Yu. Perevozkina. According to the author, the level of non-differentiated consciousness corresponds to the nuclear layer of the image of the world, mythological space corresponds to the semantic layer, information space corresponds to the perception layer. The objective of this research is to construct the model of archetype strucure dynamics viewed as a type of system of meanings with different levels of presentations in the form of intrapersonal and interpersonal structures. Cultural presentations of archetype is viewed by the author as transformed forms of intrapersonal stuctures. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author analyzes aspects and functions of archetype such as archetype as the basic tendency, symbolic presentation of the basic tendency, and as a component of intrapersonal and interpersonal architectonics. The author offers a scheme of interaction of archetype structures understood as forms of conceptual constructs. Archetype constructs are viewed as many-level semantic structures in the process of dynamic interaction. Interaction patterns of such archetype structures obey the laws of non-linear dynamics which is an instance of dynamics of intra- and inerpersonal dynamics of conceptual structures. 

Abstract: The subject of the research is the models of interpersonal dynamics of meaning structures. The author of the article analyzes the concepts of nonlinear dynamics of meaning constructs in cognitively synergetic researches, psychology of meaning, psychology of subjective semantics and psychosemantics. Based on the activity theory, the author compares the models of the self-organization of the concept described in cognitive linguistics and cognitive linguo synergetics to the processes of mutual transfer of intrapersonal and interpersonal senses in the psychology of meaning as well as the procedural model of the world view image. The goal of the research is to conduct a comparative anlaysis of activity models of meaning dynamics used in the psychology of subjective semantics and cognitive linguistic models. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author combines cognitive linguistic models of the self-organization of the concept and activity models of the dynamics of meaning structures that are defined within the framework of the psychology of subjective semantics and psychology of meaning. The author of the article offers a scheme that views the formation of consciousness and discourse determined by external and internal factors as nonlinear dynamic processes of the world image functioning at the levels of internal and communication activity.  

Abstract: The subject of this research is the models of meaning systems and conscious experience used in the psychology of subjective semantics and psychosemantics. The author of the article analyzes a number of concepts that describe prospects for the implementation of physical models used by post-nonclassical philosophers to create simulation models of mental phenomena. Based on the understanding of the meaning as a structure that determines the order and system organization of consciousness, as well as on the concept of I. Pogojina in which the theory of activity corresponds to the post-nonclassical stage of development of psychological science, the author compares models of meaning systems that exist in the psychology of subjective semantics, on the one hand, and synergistic models of consciousness on the other hand. The objective of this research is to conduct a comparative analysis of the concepts of consciousness existing in the field of psychosynergetics and psychology of subjective semantics. The scientific novelty of the research is cuased by the fact that the author combines synergetic models of consciousness on the one hand and activity theory of consciousness proposed by V. Serkin and models of the image of the world and lifestyle that exist in the psychology of subjective semantics and psychosemantics on the other hand. This allows, in the author's opinion, to expand understanding of the nature of the interaction between the image of the world and lifestyle considering the dynamic aspects of this interaction as a non-linear process on the one hand and to extrapolate the synergetic aspects of the process of interiorization to the exteriorization process on the other hand. The author of the article has also carried out extrapolation of the thesis about the differences in the languages of the description of the surface and deep semantic structures to the processes of the intrapersonal dynamics of semantic structures and human interaction with culture as a field of collective meanings.