Abstract: The subject of the research is the legal standards fixed in The Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia No. 664 'Confirmation of the Administrative Regulation on The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Executing Federal Control Over Road Travelers' Compliance with the Russian Federation Road Safety Requirements' dated September 23, 2017. The object of the research is the social relations arising between road travelers and police officers who perform control over compliance with road safety rules. The author of the article examines provisions of the Administrative Regulation and compares it to the Federal Law 'Concerning Police Activity', Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation and other regulations and legal acts. The authors focus on administrative procedures and their analysis. The methodological basis of the research includes the dialectical method, fundamental research provisions, and philosophical concepts that provide a general method of studying the reality. In the course of their research the authors have also applied methods of historical, comparative law, sociological and statistical analysis. The main conclusions of the research are made up as statements made by the author and aimed at eliminating certain provisions of the Administrative Regulation that contradict to a number of other regulatory acts. These changes offered by the authors will allow police officers to be more efficient in performing their duties when carrying out a state control over road travelers' compliance with road safety requirements and at the same time guarantee rights, freedoms and legally protected interests of citizens and enterprises. 

Abstract: The authors of this article examine problems that may arise in the process of relief from administrative responsibility. The subject of the research is the legal rules that regulate the order and procedure for relieving an entity from administrative responsibility as a result of an insignificance of an administrative offense. The object of the research is the legal relations arising between law-enforcement authorities and entities that are held liable for administrative offenses. The authors analyze Articles 2.9, 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The authors of the article emphasize the need to improve administrative laws in order to clarify grounds and rules for implementing the institution of relief from administrative responsibility. The authors also make suggestions regarding what should be changed in Articles 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The methodological basis of the research implies dialectical method, fundamental research concepts, and philosophy that provides a general method of studying the reality. In the course of their research the authors have also applied such methods as historical, legal law, sociological, statistical analysis methods. The main conclusions of the research are the following. Firstly, to observe the principles of legality and expediency when appealing to Article 2.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, the authors suggest to make significant changes to the aforesaid article in order to clarify definitions and criteria to qualify an administrative offense as insignificant. Secondly, the authors prove the need to change Articles 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. 

Abstract: The research subject includes the concept of administrative coercion in the context of a counterterrorism operation in respect of application of weapons and special equipment; compliance of the real capabilities of the participants of a counterterrorism operation with the practical demands; the requirements to combat and special purpose equipment used in antiterrorist activities. The research object consists of the patterns, being revealed during the development of the legal base for the production and application of combat and special purpose equipment by the units of internal affairs bodies and other federal executive bodies in the context of counterterrorism. The research methods include the method of comparative jurisprudence used for the estimation of the compliance of the capabilities of special purpose equipment with the modern demands. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the analysis of the conceptual framework, the proposals about the improvement of the legal framework of combat and special purpose equipment application, and the special requirements to combat and special purpose equipment. The author comes to the following conclusions: it is necessary to unify the legislation, to eliminate the existing contradictions between statutory instruments, and to form a unified conceptual framework.