|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Police activity
Reference:
Beketov M. Y., Samoroka V. A.
Assessment of threats addressed at one of the parties of the criminal
court proceedings before having recourse to safety measures
// Police activity.
2012. ¹ 4.
P. 32-37.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61508
Beketov M. Y., Samoroka V. A. Assessment of threats addressed at one of the parties of the criminal court proceedings before having recourse to safety measuresAbstract: according to Part 1 Article 16 of Federal Law from 20.08.2004 No 119-ÔÇ “About state protection of the victims, witnesses and other participants of the criminal legal proceedings” the reasons of implementation of the safety means stipulated in Article 6 of this law can be information proving real threat to the life of the person who is acting as a party in the criminal court proceedings, violence addressed at this person or destruction of their property. The article illustrates some examples of checking and assessment of seriousness of the threats addressed at the party of the criminal court proceedings, studies specificity of assessment of various types of threats. The authors substantiate the importance that the expert philologist takes part in interrogation of the party of the criminal court proceedings, because such a specialist can prove accuracy of the testimony. Keywords: party of the criminal court proceedings, investigator, safety measures, threat, psychic pressure, state protection, expert psychologist, revision, interrogation.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Bobrakov I.A. Okhrana uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-pravovye aspekty. — M., 2005.
2. Borodkina T. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya instituta gosudarstvennoy zashchity poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Mirovoy sud'ya. –2010. — ¹ 4. 3. Brusnitsyn L.V. Kommentariy zakonodatel'stva ob obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolov-nogo sudoproizvodstva (postateynyy). — M., 2009. 4. Bulatov V.A. Obespechenie sledovatelem prav, zakonnykh interesov i bezopasnosti poterpevshikh i svideteley. — Volgograd, 2002. 5. Garri Older, Beril Khezer. NLP. Vvodnyy kure. Polnoe prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. Per. s angl. — K.: «Sofiya», 2000. 6. Gaukhman L.D. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy. — M., 2003. 7. Gubin S.A. Zashchita svideteley i poterpevshikh // Zakonnost'. — 2010. — ¹ 6. 8. Dmitrieva L.Z. Obespechenie bezopasnosti poterpevshikh kak vazhnoe uslovie aktivnosti ikh uchastiya v ugolovnom presledovanii // Zakonnost'. 2010. — ¹ 8. 9. Lozovitskaya G.P. Problemy bezopasnosti uchastnikov pravosudiya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. — 2007. — ¹ 16. 10. Mel'nikov V.Yu. Zashchita i okhrana prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiy-skiy sud'ya. — 2010. — ¹ 1. 11. Samoroka V.A., Beketov M.Yu. Problemy soblyudeniya konfidentsial'nosti svedeniy o zashchishcha-emom litse pri obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2010. — ¹ 5. 12. Samoroka V.A., Beketov M.Yu. Prinyatie sledovatelem resheniya o primenenii mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2011. — ¹ 1. 13. Samoroka V.A., Beketov M.Yu. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya i podrazdeleniy gosudarstvennoy za-shchity v khode obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnoe pra-vo. — 2012. — ¹ 2. 14. Sumin A.A., Beketov M.Yu., Samoroka V.A. Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudo-proizvodstva / Pod red. A.A. Sumina. — M., 2011. 15. Shnitenkov A.V., Velikiy D.P. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «O gosudarstvennoy zashchite poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» (postateynyy). — M., 2007 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
