Reference:
Mayorov R.N..
Political theory in the United States as the space for formation of national ideology
// Trends and management.
2016. ¹ 2.
P. 145-152.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2016.2.67814 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=67814
Abstract:
This article explores the peculiarities and internal contradictions of the U. S. political theory, as well as its ability to form national ideology and feed the national idea of American people at the present stage. The U. S. political theory was initially developing as a special chapter of the American political science, called to establish both, the effectiveness of American political science, as well as the American political system. The author determines and formulates the systemic limitations imposed by the imitation of the American political theory by the natural science disciplines and following the idea of “American exclusivity”. Declaring the freedom from values in the research, the U. S. political theory is in fact closely tied to the values of liberalism. This unique dogmatism in combination with rejection of criticism makes the American political theory similar to the Communist teachings, and resembles its ideology. It is also justified by the fact that the American Political Science Association does not really tolerate dissent in its ranks, as substantiated by the actual American political scientists. In the end, the contradictions accumulated in the area of political theory impede the truly objective political research and development of political science in the United States.
Keywords:
Security, Values, Political history, State, Diplomacy, Ideology, Political theory, United States, Society, Policy
Reference:
I.V. Bocharnikov.
The Baltic direction in NATO’s strategy of inhibiting Russia
// Trends and management.
2015. ¹ 1.
P. 18-22.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2015.1.66016 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66016
Abstract:
This article presents a comparative analysis of NATO’s political and military activity in Baltic sector countries
(Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia), on the background of the developing Ukrainian crisis. The author points out the
increase in frequency and intensity of military exercises by NATO countries and its overt anti-Russian vector. The
author analyzes NATO leadership’s decisions in implementing the Newport (Wales, Great Britain) Summit’s decisions
in additional weapons placement in Baltic countries, and in creating a rapid reaction force. The methodological basis
of this research is the systemic, structural-functional, comparative-political, geopolitical and cultural-civilizational approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation. The author reaches
conclusions regarding NATO’s provocative work to involve neutral Baltic countries into the Alliance – Sweden and
Finland. The author points out that the Baltic region, along with Ukraine, one of the major tension points between
Russian Federation and NATO.
Keywords:
administration, politics, world order, geopolitics, NATO, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukrainian crisis, Baltic region.
Reference:
Shitova, E.N..
Democracy with adjectives: state studies aspect.
// Trends and management.
2014. ¹ 3.
P. 228-236.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2014.3.65316 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65316
Abstract:
The modern world includes the disparity between formal democratic institutions and cultural, historical,
value-oriented tradition, which are historically formed in certain states (societies). The matter of democracies meeting
formal procedural requirements, while their democratic nature is dubious, formed new concepts for the description
of the changes, which are generally called “democracy with adjectives”. Currently the discourse of “democracies with
adjectives” involves over 60 states, and the most detailed discussion is based upon the examples of Latin American
states. The methodological basis for the studies involves systemic, systemic structural, geopolitical and cultural
civilization approach, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation. The article describes
the concept of “democracy with adjectives”, providing graphic examples of states, which are involved in this discourse, singling out certain characteristic features typical of these regions, allowing to show regional spread of
democracy problems and their configuration, to find out whether certain problems are typical of one group of states,
or the problems have no regional dimension.
Keywords:
politics, administration, international relations, democracy, political regime, Latin America, democratization, regional spread, interests, security
Reference:
Bezrukova, M..
Specific features of public diplomacy of Germany in Russia.
// Trends and management.
2014. ¹ 3.
P. 237-242.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2014.3.65317 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65317
Abstract:
The intercultural communication serving as a medium between cultures and traditions of various nations
and states of the modern world is the foremost important technology of public diplomacy in the XXI century. In late
XX and early XXI century Germany has been a key strategic partner of Russia among the EU Member States. In addition,
Germany is somewhat like a guide for Russia in the EU. Currently Russian-German cultural cooperation develops
progressively and successfully. The methodological basis for the studies involves systemic, systemic structural, geopolitical
and cultural civilization approach, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation.
Russian-German cultural cooperation fits within the strategy of historical reconciliation, which is implemented by
both parties, of stimulation of communication among our nations and their in-depth acquaintance with the culture
and spiritual values of Russia and Germany. Public diplomacy of Germany is aimed at the formation of the positive
image of Germany and spreading the German values in Russia with the help of intercultural communications in order
to strengthen strategic partnership between the states.
Keywords:
politics, administration, public diplomacy, Germany, strategic cooperation, intercultural communication, Russia, EU, security, political regime.
Reference:
Repyeva, A.M..
Russian potential for development administration in the regions of Siberia and the Far
East.
// Trends and management.
2014. ¹ 3.
P. 243-247.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2014.3.65318 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65318
Abstract:
From the political standpoint the topic of the article is among one of the most actual issues in the sphere of
international relations of Russia and other states, specifically, China. Regional relations between the two states play
an important role in the formation of integration processes, providing for the economic basis for the formation of
the strong Russian-Chinese political alliance, serving as a counterweight to other political unions and associations
in the international political arena. Obviously growing political and economic role of the Communist China provides
important prerequisites for defining, studies and development of the relations between the Russian Federation and
the People’s Republic of China in the regional dimension. Also, Russia and China have common economic and political
interests, especially in bordering regions – Siberia and the Far East, which need to be studied. The methodology
of studies was formed with the principles of systemic and comparative approaches towards the issue. Evaluation
of regional relations between Russia and China within this context allow one to see the development of this matter
within the context of dynamically developing and changing political and economic relations. The systemic approach
has allowed to evaluate the elements of the Russian-Chinese cooperation as a coherent work of elements within the
system of international relations. Russia and China play an important role in the Asian-Pacific region. These bilateral
relations have always been taking an important place in the foreign policies of both states, since they share close
geographic, geopolitical, geo-economical ties and cultural exchanges due to the historical relations between them. It
has to do with the fact that sharpness of the international problems require common measures taken by the two states,
calls for finding new mechanisms for cooperation and integration, including those in their regional dimension.
Keywords:
center, regions, modernization, industry, potential, natural resources, bordering regions, Russia, China, the Far East.
Reference:
Hizrieva, S.S..
“Soft power” of Brazil in the European Union in the period of presidency of Lula da
Silva.
// Trends and management.
2014. ¹ 3.
P. 248-253.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2014.3.65319 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65319
Abstract:
Today Brazil applies new information communication technologies in order to spread Brazilian values in
the world and in the EU in particular in order to guarantee its leadership. One of the directions of the foreign policy
of L.I. Lula da Silva has been widening the scope of relations with the EU states, which could form competition for the
US in Brazil and provide information support for Brazil within the development of strategic partnership as a result
of information and economic pressure from the US. Methodological basis for the study is formed with the systemic, structural-functional, comparative political and cultural civilization approaches, methods of induction, deduction,
analysis, synthesis, modeling, expert evaluation, observation. Information development of Government and Embassy
sites of the Federal Republic of Brazil in order to make their work with the foreign audiences in the states and regions
of the EU facilitated the development of the bilateral contacts between the two regions ranging from economic and
political projects to scientific an cultural cooperation.
Keywords:
politics, management, Brazil, EU, USA, soft power, intercultural communication, political communication, reputation, image.