Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

The role of holy wives' representations in the Medieval Rus' icons (XV–XVI centuries) with the main figure of St. Nicholas of Myra and the chosen saints

Pshenichnyi Petr Vladimirovich

ORCID: 0009-0004-3704-0046

Postgraduate student; Department of the History of Russian Art; Lomonosov Moscow State University

119192, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory str., 1, room G-420

pshenichniy321@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2024.7.71245

EDN:

YMNVJQ

Received:

12-07-2024


Published:

19-07-2024


Abstract: In the ancient Russian art of the XV–XVI centuries, there are often works with the image of St. St. Nicholas of Myra, represented in various iconographic types and accompanied by images of holy wives. These monuments have a similar compositional structure. Among them, the most significant are those icons where the image of the Myrlician saint is placed in the centerpiece, and the figures of selected saints are represented in the margins. The subject of the study in this work is the corpus of monuments with the central image of St. Nicholas as well as the figures of the chosen saints in the fields and the images of female holiness in the margins. The purpose of this article is to determine the role of the figures of the holy women in these icon compositions by the example of monuments of a certain iconographic origin and to offer an interpretation of this previously insufficiently studied plot. To do this, we will resort to the iconographic method of research, which allows us to identify certain nuances of compositional construction, to reveal the spiritual content of the image. The method of comparative analysis is no less important in this work. The works of interest to us are united by the composition of the figures of the few holy women in the lower field, which are associated with evangelical events and the theme of steadfastness in faith (st. Paraskeva, st. Varvara or st. Ulyana), or have pronounced motives for appearing at the Last Judgment (St. Catherine). The stable tradition of depicting these holy women in the iconographic composition of these monuments suggests their correlation with the central image. We believe that they were designed to emphasize the idea of the intercession of the female saints and were organically into iconographic system.


Keywords:

St. Nicholas of Myra, female saints, chosen saints, St. Paraskevi, St. Catherine, St. Nicetas, St. George, saints’ intercession, Deesis, icon

This article is automatically translated.

Figures of holy women are often found in the iconographic composition of monuments of medieval art in Orthodox countries: in monumental paintings of temples, in decorative and applied art, but their images play a particularly important role in iconography. Variations of images of holy wives are numerous, they are often depicted as the central plot of the monument, with hagiographic stamps, as part of selected saints, in compositions with the image of the Mother of God or in the margins of those works where the image of one or another event of Sacred history or figures of other revered saints is presented in the centerpiece.

Special attention should be paid to the stable tradition of placing figures of female holiness in the composition of icons with the central image of St. Nicholas. Nicholas of Myra. They bring variety to the iconographic design of the work, complementing and expanding the meaning of the central image. This story became widespread in the period of the XV–XVI centuries that we are interested in.

Starting from the earliest stage of the history of ancient Russian art, icon painters resorted to complicated versions of the image of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas of Myra, relying both on the types that came from Byzantium, and creating his own iconographic schemes [1, p. 551]. This indicates the significance of these monuments in the culture of Ancient Russia, the depth and complexity of their iconographic design. The figurative structure of the icons we are considering is largely determined by their iconography.

The subject of this work is the semantics of images of holy women in the compositions under study. We are considering a body of monuments with a central image of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas and the figures of the chosen saints in the fields, where there are also images of female holiness. Since the veneration of images of holy wives reflected in ancient Russian iconography throughout the XV–XVI centuries is quite stable, we do not have the task of mentioning all the preserved icons of the type under study. We will focus in detail on the most representative works.

The purpose of this article is to identify the role of figures of holy women in these compositions using the example of monuments of this iconographic work and to offer an interpretation of such images. To do this, we will resort to the iconographic method of research, which allows us to identify certain nuances of compositional construction, to reveal the spiritual content of the image. No less important in this work is the method of comparative analysis, which involves the use of the latest research reflecting both the specifics of the existence of the texts of the lives of holy women and the tradition of their veneration in the culture of Ancient Russia of the XIV–XVI centuries [2, 3, 4].

In the icon "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with the stamps of the life and two chosen saints (Paraskeva and Ermolai)", the first half of the XVI century. (GTG) [5, cat. 21], in addition to complex detailed stamps, there is an image of the holy martyr, which introduces additional semantic accents into the iconographic program of the monument. Since the images of St. Ermolai in ancient Russian iconography are rare and appear in compositions with selected saints, most likely as a patron figure, then perhaps the choice of St. Paraskeva is also dictated by this motif. However, in many cases, the correlation of the figures of the holy wives and the Holy St. Nicholas of Myra may have other grounds.

Figure 1 – St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with St. Paraskeva and St. Ermolai, and the life of St. Nicholas. Nicholas. The first half of the XVI century. (GTG)

Figure 1 – St. Nicholas of Myra, with chosen saints St. Paraskevi and St. Hermolaus of Nicomedia. First half of the 16th century (Tretyakov Gallery)

Such images are found in the composition of monuments, where the figure of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker in the middle is represented in a variety of iconographic images: for example, "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker". Nikola Mozhaisky, happy holidays and chosen saints", the second quarter – the middle of the XVI century. (collection of S.N. Vorobyov) [6, cat. 8], as well as in images of the type of Nikola Zaraisky: "St. St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deesis and the chosen saints in stamps", the end of the XV century. (Vologda Museum) [7, cat. 233] and "St. St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with the deesis rank and selected saints", mid-XVI century. (Arkhangelsk Museum) [8, cat. 56].

Figure 2 – Nikola Mozhaisky, with holidays and selected saints. The second quarter is the middle of the XVI century. (Collection of S.N. Vorobyov)

Figure 2 – St. Nicholas of Mozhaysk, with biblical scenes and chosen saints. Middle of 16th century (Private collection of S.N. Vorobyev)

It is not uncommon for images where the chosen saints accompany the waist image of St. Nicholas on the background, for example, "St. Nicholas. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with the chosen saints", the first third of the XV century. (Novgorod Museum) [9, cat. 21], "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker", the first half of the XVI century. (Pskov Museum) [10, cat. 38] and "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker". St. Nicholas of Myra, with the Trinity of the Old Testament, the appearance of the Mother of God to St. Sergius of Radonezh and the chosen saints", the first half of the XVI century. (The Museum named after Andrey Rublev) [11, cat. 59].

Figure 3 – St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with selected saints. The first third of the XV century. (Novgorod Museum)

Figure 3 – St. Nicholas of Myra, with chosen saints. First third of 15th century (Novgorod Museum)

However, the compositions with the central image of St. Nicholas are the most revealing. St. Nicholas of Myra and the images of the chosen saints in the fields. As an example, a number of monuments with a similar compositional structure should be pointed out: icons of the second half of the XV century (GTG) [5, cat. 16], the end of the XV–beginning of the XVI century (Vladimir-Suzdal Museum) [12, cat. 17], the beginning of the XVI century. (Rostov Museum) [13, cat. 31], the first half of the XVI century. (Arkhangelsk Museum) [8, cat. 44], the first half of the XVI century. (GRM) [14, cat. 101]. All these works are united by a stable composition of a few holy wives among the figures of the chosen saints in the lower field. They form a compositional parallel to the deesis rank depicted above. Thus, the importance of the saints represented below is emphasized. At this time, those images of female holiness that are associated with evangelical events and the theme of steadfastness in faith (such as St. Paraskeva Friday, St. Barbara or St. Ulyana), or have pronounced motives for appearing at the Last Judgment (St. Catherine), acquire special importance. These aspects of the veneration of holy wives, which existed even in pre-Mongol times, correlate, not least, with the protective functions of the figure of St. Nicholas himself. Nicholas, which reveals a deep symbolic relationship between these images and the figure of the Myrlician wonderworker.

The icon of the Russian North, which belongs in its style to the iconography of the Russian North, is "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deisus and the chosen Saints", the second half of the XV century (GTG), represents the traditional version of the iconography we are considering at that time. In the monuments listed above, which are associated with different levels of order and are often separated from each other by a significant chronological interval, a distinctive feature is the invariable principle of placing the image of St. Nicholas. Nikita on the central axis with Christ and St. Nicholas. By Nicholas. The names of both the Myrlician saint and the warrior-martyr [15, p. 316] are associated with the Greek word "VίΚη" ("victory") [16, p. 15], which researchers have already noticed [16, p. 92]. The image of St. Nikita "... traditionally was especially closely associated with the image of the Savior, acted as the conqueror of the devil and evil spirits" [12, p. 128], which is in tune with the perception of the saint as a demon [17, p. 240]. Often this scheme is accompanied by the image of St. George the Victorious, which has the same semantics (as, for example, on the icon "St. George the Victorious Nicholas the Wonderworker, with the chosen saints", late XV– early XVI century, from the Vladimir-Suzdal Museum).

Figure 4 – St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deesis and the chosen saints. The second half of the XV century. (GTG)

Figure 4 – St. Nicholas of Myra, with Deesis and chosen saints. Second half of 15th century (Tretyakov Gallery)

However, the researchers did not pay enough attention to the independent role of images of holy women in the composition of these monuments. The correlation of the figure of St. Paraskeva with the image of the Myrlician saint is not accidental: the intercession of St. St. Nicholas and his numerous miracles associated with salvation from the elements, captivity and all kinds of dangers are widely known [18, p. 97], however, the cult of St. Paraskeva has similar motives of patronage.

In this regard, a monument originating from Tver is indicative: the side door of the iconostasis with the image of Deisus, the Miracle of George about the Serpent, St. Nikita beating the devil, early XVI century (GRM) [16, cat. 25]. Here the themes of prayerful standing and the trampling of the powers of hell by the saints are combined [16, p. 90]. It should be noted that in the deesis rank, the image of St. John the Baptist is placed on the upper field instead of the usual figure of John the Baptist. St. Nicholas the Wonderworker.

Figure 5 – The side door of the iconostasis. Deesis, the miracle of George about the serpent, St. Nikita, beating the devil. The beginning of the XVI century. (Timing)

Figure 5 – The iconostasis door, Deesis, George’s miracle of the serpent and St. Nicetas with demon. Beginning of 16th century (Russian Museum)

B.A. Uspensky believes that on Slavic soil in ancient times, even in the era of the spread of Christianity, there was a merger of the cult of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas and Archangel Michael: thus, the idea of St. Nicholas was formed. Nicholas of Myra as praying before the Lord for Orthodox Christians, like the Mother of God or Archangel Michael, which is reflected in the monuments of iconography [19, pp. 14-23].

In view of the above, there is no doubt that the iconographic program of this icon was dictated precisely by the desire to emphasize the intercession of the saints before the Lord, especially the saints. Nicholas, George and Nikita, as well as a small circle of holy wives.

In Slavic literature, and only in it, the story of the miracle of St. Paraskeva of Iconium, which was especially revered in Russia, has been preserved [2, p. 76]. According to legend, under Bishop Theodore, the hometown of this saint, called Iconium, was besieged by an Arab army, but at the prayer of the martyr, the Lord had mercy on the inhabitants, and the enemy army retreated [3, p. 588]. This feature of the cult of St. Paraskeva brings the perception of her image closer to the protective facets of the worship of St. Paraskeva. To Nicholas, which is reflected in the tradition of "joint glorification of the holy intercessors and helpers in various troubles and misfortunes <...> A feature of icons reflecting this tradition is a single compositional scheme" [16, p. 15].

In the iconographic program of the icon "St. Nicholas the Wonderworker with Deesis and the chosen saints", the beginning of the XVI century. (Rostov Museum) the images of saints in the fields are placed in violation of the hierarchy of holiness: Saints Basil the Great and Gregory the Theologian are represented above the supreme apostles Peter and Paul, which probably indicates the ecclesiological aspect introduced into the iconographic design of the monument. Below the holy apostles there are figures of healers Cosmas and Damian.

Figure 6 – St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deesis and the chosen saints. The beginning of the XVI century. (Rostov Museum)

Figure 6 – St. Nicholas of Myra, with Deesis and chosen saints. Beginning of 16th century (Rostov Museum)

According to the researchers, about the fact that St. Nicholas "... is represented as the great bishop and head of the Church of Christ, as evidenced by the images of the Savior Not Made with Hands at the top and the martyrs at the bottom of the icon. The martyrs, revered for their voluntarily shed blood in the name of faithfulness to Christ, for imitating the Savior in His sacrificial death, were perceived as those who became the founder of the Church, its "cornerstones" [13, p. 130]. Probably the image of St. In the context of the deesis composition, it is intended to emphasize the facet of his veneration, which is associated with the ideas of St. Nicholas. Nicholas as a great bishop, preacher of the Gospel, pillar and affirmator of the true faith.

The apotropaic significance of the image of St. Nicholas of Myra is accentuated by the fact that among the figures placed on the lower field there are images of holy women – Paraskeva, Barbara and Catherine, which suggests the significance of their role in the overall compositional design of the icon. It should be noted that St. Catherine is depicted along the central axis, probably in connection with the protective aspects of her veneration that spread in the culture of Ancient Russia. We are talking about the popular idea of the saint as an intercessor for Christians who are on their deathbed on the eve of the Last Judgment. According to ancient beliefs, whoever turns to this saint for prayerful help will receive absolution of all sins [4, p. 96].

The researchers note that, compared with pre–Mongol times, at the turn of the XV-XVI centuries, the cult of St. Catherine began to flourish, associated with the activation of contacts between Russia and the consecrated Saint. Catherine of Sinai Monastery, and with the fact that the martyr was the patroness of Katarina Tsaccaria, who was a close relative of Basil III, which greatly contributed to the status of the saint as the patroness of the royal family [4, p. 94].

Based on the presence of these protective motives, it is necessary to interpret the iconography of those monuments where images of other venerated saints are located in the middle: we are talking about St. George the Victorious and St. Nikita, as, for example, in the icon "The Great Martyr Nikita, beating the devil, with Deisus and the chosen saints", the second half – the last third of the XV century. (collection of S.N. Vorobyov) [20, cat. 22] or "The Miracle of George about the Serpent, with Deesis and the chosen saints", the last quarter – the end of the XV century. (the same collection) [20, cat. 29].

Figure 7 – The Great Martyr Nikita, beating the devil, with Deesis and the chosen saints. The second half – the last third of the XV century. (The Vorobyov Collection)

Figure 7 – St. Nicetas with demon, with Deesis and chosen saints. Second half of 15th century (Private collection of S.N. Vorobyev)

Let's summarize the results. Compositions with a central image of St. St. Nicholas and the chosen saints around him, where the images of holy wives are placed on the lower field, represent a significant phenomenon in the art of Ancient Russia of the XV–XVI centuries. The icons we have considered reflect a stable tradition. It is all the more remarkable that the images of holy women are present in the composition of these monuments. The images of female holiness are combined with the main figure, the theme of intercession for Orthodox Christians, and are designed to emphasize the apotropaic properties of the cult represented in the middle of the Myrlician saint.

References
1. Shalina, I. A. (2011). Typology of Medieval Rus’ iconography of St. Nicholas of Myra of the 11th–16th centuries. Good pilot. Veneration of St. Nicholas in the Christian world, 550–591.
2. Vinogradov, A. Iu. (2000). Great Martyr Paraskeva of Iconium and her “unpreserved” Greek acts. Department of Byzantine and Modern Greek Philology, 1, 76–80.
3. Vinogradov, A. Iu. (2019). St. Paraskevi. In Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia. (Ed.). The Orthodox Encyclopedia. Vol. LIV (pp. 587-588). Moscow: Orthodox Encyclopedia Church Research Center.
4. Menyailo, V. A. (2000). Hagiology of the Great Martyr Catherine in Rus’ in the 11th–17th centuries. Art of the Christian world. Collection of articles, 4, 92-107.
5. Nersesian, L. V. (Ed.). (2022). Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker. Icons of the 13th–20th centuries. Moscow: State Tretyakov Gallery.
6. Popov, G. V. (Ed.). (2004). Icons from private collections. Russian icon painting of the 14th – early 20th centuries. Moscow: TETRU.
7. Rybakov, A. A. (1995). The Vologda icons. Centers of artistic culture of the Vologda land of the 13th-18th centuries. Moscow: Galart.
8. Nersesian, L. V. (Ed.). (2007). Icons of the Russian North: Masterpieces of Medieval Rus’ Painting of the Arkhangelsk Museum of Fine Arts. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
9. Nersesian, L. V. (Ed.). (2008). Icons of Veliky Novgorod of the 11th – early 16th centuries. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
10. Vasil'eva, O. A. (2006). Icons of Pskov. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
11. Nersesian, L. V. (Ed.). (2007). Icons of the 13th–16th centuries in the collection of the Andrei Rublev Museum. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
12. Nersesian, L. V. (Ed.). (2006). Icons of Vladimir and Suzdal. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
13. Vakhrina, V. I. (2006). Icons of Rostov the Great. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
14. Petrova, E. N.; Solov'eva, I. D. (Eds.). (2011). The Holy Rus'. Saint Petersburg: Palace Edition.
15 Lives of saints in Russian, set out according to the guide of the Chetyih-Menya of St. Demetrius of Rostov. The first book. September. (2010). Moscow: Kovcheg.
16. Solov'eva, I. D. (Ed.). (2006). Saint Nicholas of Myra in works of the 12th–19th centuries from the collection of the Russian Museum. Saint Petersburg: Palace Editions.
17. Nersesian, L. V. (Ed.). (2007). Icons of Vologda of the 14th–16th centuries. Moscow: Northern Pilgrim.
18. Bugaevskii, A. V., & Vinogradov, A. Iu. (2018). St. Nicholas. In Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia (Ed.). The Orthodox Encyclopedia, Vol. L (pp. 90-104). Moscow: Orthodox Encyclopedia Church Research Center.
19. Uspenskii, B. A. (1982). Philological research in the field of the Slavic antiquities. Moscow: Moscow University Press.
20. Shalina, I. A. (Ed.). (2009). Masterpieces of Russian icon painting of the 14th-16th centuries from private collections. Moscow: Charitable Foundation “Private Museum of Russian Icons”.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for publication in the journal "Philosophy and Culture" by the author is indicated in the title ("Figures of holy wives as part of ancient Russian icon compositions of the XV–XVI centuries with the central image of St. Nicholas of Myra and images of selected saints) somewhat conditionally. To a greater extent, the title presents the object of research — the compositional canon of ancient Russian icons of the XV–XVI centuries. (iconographic edition) with a central image of St. Nicholas of Myra and images of selected saints, in which the subject of the study (the apotropaic meaning of the symbolism of the images of holy women) is considered by the author in sufficient detail, but defined by the author to the reader in a slightly different way: "The subject of research in this work is a corpus of monuments with a central image of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas and the figures of the chosen saints in the fields, where there are also images of female holiness." In fact, the author states the empirical research material as the subject of the study, which is obvious already in the next sentence (goal setting), where the author indicates that he intends "to determine the role of figures of holy women in these icon compositions using the example of monuments of a certain iconographic origin and to offer an interpretation of an earlier insufficiently studied plot." An example is the empirical material, not the subject of the study. The mentioned "role of the figures of the holy wives in ... icon compositions" represents, from the formal and logical side, just the location of the object ("the role of the figures of the holy wives" or more precisely, the apotropaic meaning of the symbolism of their images) in the object ("in ... icon compositions"). The formal mistake of substituting the thesis, of course, should be eliminated, although in this particular article it does not look critical, since the central place in the article is occupied by the analysis of the author's sample of empirical material ("corpus of monuments"), as a result of which the substantive side of the studied subject of research becomes clear. The strength of the research is a detailed analysis of selected examples of icon compositions of the XV–XVI centuries, presented, among other things, in well-attributed illustrations. At the same time, the reviewer draws attention to the fact that the author ignores the need to characterize the completeness of the sample he made ("corpus of monuments"). This is not a critical mistake, since, most likely, the meaning of the symbolism of the figures of female holiness in the iconography of the XV–XVI centuries. it remained quite stable, and it can be extended to the entire attribution set of icons of this period containing the studied female images. The article deals with the icons of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with St. Paraskeva and St. Ermolai, and the life of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas (the first half of the XVI century.) from the GTG, St. Nicholas of Mozhaisk, with holidays and selected saints (the second quarter – the middle of the XVI century.) from the collection of S.N. Vorobyov, St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with selected saints (the first third of the XV century.) of the Novgorod Museum, St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deesis and selected saints (the second half of the XV century.) from the GTG, St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deisus and selected saints (early XVI century.) of the Rostov Museum, the Great Martyr Nikita beating the devil, with Deisus and selected saints (the second half – the last third of the XV century.) from the Vorobyov collection., as well as the side door of the iconostasis "Deisus, St. George's miracle of the serpent, St. Nikita beating the devil" (early XVI century). In general, it is obvious to specialists that a sample of empirical material can be considered representative. Although the author's statement of this fact or concretization of the fact that the author has considered the full body of attributed monuments would significantly facilitate the use of the results achieved by the author to specialists in related fields. Thus, the subject of the study, although presented by the author to the reader, is somewhat confusingly considered in sufficient detail at a good theoretical level, and the author's final conclusion that "images of female holiness are combined with the main figure by the theme of intercession for Orthodox Christians and are designed to emphasize the apotropaic properties of the cult represented in the middle of the Myra saint" is well reasoned and deserves theoretical attention. The stated goal of the work has been achieved. The research methodology, despite the confusion of a formal nature with the definition of the subject of research, is well-founded by the author's reliance on the approaches of reputable scientists (B. A. Uspensky, A. Y. Vinogradov, I. A. Shalina, etc.). The author competently uses a complex of art criticism (iconographic, comparative and semiotic analysis) and general scientific (typology, comparison, interpretation) methods. In general, with the exception of the above formal and logical error, the research program is well presented to the reader and logically implemented. The final conclusion is well-reasoned and trustworthy. The author justifies the relevance of the chosen topic by the fact that the figures of holy wives are often found in the iconographic composition of monuments of medieval art in Orthodox countries, but remain poorly studied. Of course, this gap deserves theoretical attention, especially in the context of the acute controversy surrounding certain gender issues. The scientific novelty of the study, expressed in the author's analysis of the corpus of monuments and the final conclusion, is beyond doubt. The style of the text is generally scientific: the only remark concerns the need to decipher the abbreviation (GTG) widely used in scientific circulation at the first mention. The structure of the article corresponds to the logic of the presentation of the research results. The bibliography, taking into account the author's reliance on the analysis of empirical material, sufficiently reveals the subject field, is designed without noticeable violations of the requirements of the editorial board and GOST. The appeal to the opponents is quite correct and sufficient, although the author does not enter into an acute polemic with colleagues. The article is of interest to the readership of the journal "Philosophy and Culture" and after a little revision, taking into account the comments of the reviewer, it can be recommended for publication.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the journal Philosophy and Culture, the author presented his article "The role of figures of holy wives in the composition of ancient Russian icon compositions of the XV–XVI centuries with the central image of St. Nicholas of Myra and images of selected saints", in which a study of the phenomenon of ancient Russian icon painting and its characteristic features was conducted. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the veneration of St. Nicholas of Myra was extremely widespread in the culture of Ancient Russia, which was embodied not only in a variety of iconographic versions of the image of this saint, but also in those shades of meaning that are conveyed by the stylistic features of specific monuments. Of particular interest to the author are those works where the image of St. Nicholas is given in the middle. St. Nicholas, and in the margins – the figures of the chosen saints. Such icons appeared in Byzantium and became widespread in the art of Orthodox countries, including Russia. The relevance of the research is determined by the need for iconographic research of works of ancient Russian religious art. The research methodology is based on historical, art criticism and iconographic analysis. The theoretical basis of the research is the works of such Russian art historians as Shalina I.A., Vinogradov A.Yu., Rybakov A.A. and others. The empirical basis is the samples of ancient Russian icon painting from the XV–XVI centuries. In accordance with the problems raised in the article, the purpose of the study is to determine the role of figures of holy women in iconographic compositions and to propose an interpretation of such images on the example of monuments with a central image of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas and the figures of the chosen saints in the fields, where there are also images of female holiness. To achieve this goal, the author sets the following tasks: interpretation of the image based on the iconographic method of research; definition of the role of images of holy women in the artistic culture of Ancient Russia. The subject of the study is the semantics of images of holy women in the composition of the studied compositions. Based on the analysis of the scientific validity of the problem, the author comes to the conclusion that, despite some interest in the problem of interpreting images of female holiness as part of ancient Russian icons, researchers have not actively addressed this aspect of the topic. The author's detailed study of this topic constitutes the scientific novelty of the study. The author has done a detailed artistic iconographic and compositional analysis of the icons of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with St. Paraskeva and St. Ermolai, and the life of St. Nicholas. St. Nicholas (the first half of the XVI century.), Nicholas Mozhaisky, with holidays and selected saints (the second quarter – the middle of the XVI century.), St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with selected saints (the first third of the XV century.), St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deesis and selected saints (the second half of the XV century.), the side door of the iconostasisSa. Deisus, the miracle of George about the serpent, St. Nikita, beating the devil (early XVI century.), St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, with Deisus and the chosen saints (early XVI century.), the Great Martyr Nikita, beating the devil, with Deisus and the chosen saints (the second half – the last third of the XV century.). The author concludes thatAll these works are united by a stable circle of figures of a few holy wives as part of the chosen saints in the lower field. They represent a compositional parallel to the deesis rank depicted above. This emphasizes the importance of the saints depicted below. At this time, those images of female holiness that are associated with evangelical events and the theme of perseverance in faith (such as St. Paraskeva Friday), or have pronounced motives for appearing at the Last Judgment (St. Catherine), acquire special importance. These aspects of the veneration of holy wives, which existed even in pre-Mongol times, correlate not least with the protective functions of the figure of St. Nicholas himself. Nicholas, which reveals a deep symbolic relationship between these images and the figure of the Myrlician wonderworker. In conclusion, the author presents the conclusions of the study, including all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of iconography of a certain period, the peculiarities of the formation of its authenticity, is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the study consists of 20 sources, which seems sufficient for the generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the subject under study. The author fulfilled his goal, showed deep knowledge of the studied issues, received scientific results that made it possible to summarize the material. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.