Library
|
Your profile |
Psychologist
Reference:
Kobryanova, I.V., Nazarov, S.S., Serova, Y.S., Fettsova, L.N., Yatmanov, A.N. (2024). A mathematical model for predicting the neuropsychic stability of a cadet. Psychologist, 6, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8701.2024.6.69806
A mathematical model for predicting the neuropsychic stability of a cadet
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8701.2024.6.69806EDN: HIRUTQReceived: 09-02-2024Published: 05-01-2025Abstract: Military service is a special type of activity, in which the stress effect on a person plays a high role. The article is devoted to the study of the influence of cognitive abilities on neuropsychic stability of cadets, as one of the most controversial issues in the medical and psychological support of military personnel. The subject of the study is the influence of cognitive abilities on the neuropsychic stability of cadets. The object of the study is: 1,822 cadets of the Naval Polytechnic Institute aged 18 to 26 years with different levels of neuropsychiatric stability. The sample was divided into three parts according to the level of neuropsychiatric stability. Special attention is paid to statistical data processing as an important element of the scientific method of cognition of the world. The article provides examples of calculating a model for predicting the level of neuropsychiatric stability of the cadets. A comparative study of the cognitive abilities of cadets with different levels of neuropsychiatric stability was conducted. Mathematical modeling was carried out using discriminant analysis. Predictors of a cadet's neuropsychic stability are a combination of indicators of their cognitive development: the ability to establish logical relationships between concepts based on analysis and synthesis operations, the level of development of verbal and logical thinking; tempo characteristics of mental activity, the level of development of operational thinking and operational memory, as well as attention characteristics; the ability to transform visual images in space, the level of development of spatial-figurative thinking. It is shown that the level of communication abilities increases from low to high neuropsychiatric stability. At the same time, the differences between the indicators of cadets with high neuropsychological stability differ significantly compared with cadets with medium and low, the differences between groups with low and medium stability are determined at the trend level. A model for predicting the level of neuropsychic stability was obtained: Wilkes Lambda: 0.95595 approx. F (6.3634)=13.799 p Keywords: cognitive abilities, neuropsychic stability, serviceman, cadet, medical and psychological support, forecast, mathematical model, influence, stress, sustainabilityThis article is automatically translated. Military service is a special type of activity, in which stress plays a high role on a person [10, 12]. Overcoming stressful situations is determined by the level of neuropsychiatric stability [1, 13]. The issues of neuropsychiatric stability are represented by scientific works, both by foreign psychologists, teachers, and domestic ones. Thus, according to a foreign psychologist, teacher E.V. Melnik, NPU is a set of component individualization of psychological and pedagogical training of a person [8]. According to L.I. Spivak– it manifests itself in a tendency to breakdowns in the activity of the nervous system under significant mental and physical stress [2]. The author sees the reason in the obvious or hidden violations of the emotional and volitional sphere, as well as in the intellectual self-regulation of a person. Some scientists claim that NPS is frustration tolerance or stress tolerance [14]. V.V. Yusupov compares neuropsychiatric stability with a characteristic that determines the state of a stable level of development of cognitive mental processes, emotional-volitional regulation and behavioral reactions in the process of professional activity [16]. NPU is defined as a person's ability to regulate their interaction with their environment, as well as act purposefully in this environment [7, 17]. The main elements of the NPU include: self-esteem, the level of emotional stability, the presence of social approval from the people around him [5]. The influence of cognitive abilities on a person's neuropsychiatric stability is of interest [11], which was the purpose of the study. The purpose of the work: to develop a mathematical model for predicting neuropsychiatric stability based on the characteristics of the cadet's cognitive abilities. Materials and methods. 1822 cadets of the Naval Polytechnic Institute aged from 18 to 26 years were examined. The level of neuropsychiatric stability was determined using the MLO "Adaptivity" technique [3]. Military personnel with an NPS level of more than 7 walls (n=565) were assigned to the "High NPS" group, from 4 to 7 walls (n=1186) – to the "Medium NPS" group, 71 surveyed were assigned to the "Low NPS" group with a level of less than 4 walls [15]. Cognitive abilities were assessed using the KR – 3 – 85 technique [6]. Statistical processing was carried out using the Statistica 10.0 program. The normality of the distribution was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion. Comparative analysis using the parametric t-Student criterion. When conducting multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was applied, that is, in three groups, differences in p were considered statistically significant.<0,017 (0,05/3=0,017) [4]. Mathematical modeling was carried out on the basis of discriminant analysis [9]. The results and their discussion. When conducting discriminant analysis using the "step-by-step forward" method, a model for predicting the level of neuropsychiatric stability of a cadet was obtained: Wilkes Lambda: 0.95595 approx. F (6.3634)=13.799 p<0.0001 and the discriminant variables are determined (Table 1). Table 1 Discriminant variables
It was revealed that the combination of cognitive development indicators is a predictor of neuropsychiatric stability of military university cadets.: the ability to establish logical relationships between concepts based on analysis and synthesis operations, the level of development of verbal and logical thinking - the analogy subtest (AN); tempo characteristics of mental activity, the level of development of operational thinking and operational memory, as well as the characteristics of attention – the arithmetic counting subtest (AS); the ability to transform visual images in space, The level of development of spatial-figurative thinking is the "cubes" (K) subtest. It is shown that the level of communication abilities increases from low to high neuropsychiatric stability. At the same time, the differences between the indicators of high NPS differ significantly (p<0.017) compared with the average and low severity, the differences between the groups with low and medium resistance are determined at the trend level (0.017<r<0.05) (Table 2). Table 2 Comparative analysis of discriminant variables, (x±s)
Notes: *p 0.017 <r<0.05 with the "Low NPU" group ** p<0.017 with the "Medium NPU" and "Low NPU" groups
Based on a discriminant model for predicting the level of neuropsychiatric stability of a cadet, the examined person belongs to one of three groups. The components of the classification functions: variables and coefficients for variables, constants of three LCFS, to determine the prognosis of the level of neuropsychiatric stability of the cadet are presented in Table 3. Table 3 Classification functions for predicting the level of neuropsychiatric stability of a cadet
The discriminant model has a predictive ability of 68%, while none of the observations from the medium and high NPS groups were misdiagnosed as low NPS. In the low NPS group, 53.5 cadets were correctly identified, which suggests that this model is most effectively able to identify cadets in this group in order to carry out corrective measures with them (Table 4). Table 4 Accuracy of recognition of the cadet's neuropsychiatric stability forecast (basic calculation)
The algorithm for determining the prediction of the level of neuropsychiatric stability of a cadet is shown in Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Algorithm for determining the prediction of the level of neuropsychiatric stability of a cadet
To determine the forecast of the level of neuropsychiatric stability of a cadet, calculations are performed using all available formulas, the group whose results are the largest and is the desired one. This procedure is standard for linear classification functions. (LCF-i)max= Low NPU (1), Medium NPU (2), High NPU (3). Example 1. The following indicators were determined for the subject: An = 9, AC = 9, K = 8. When calculating the formulas LKF-1 = 17.025; LKF-2 = 15.209; LKF-3 = 18.116. The maximum number corresponds to the calculation of the formula for LKF-3, thus, the examined person is predicted to have high neuropsychiatric stability. Example 2. The following indicators were determined for the subject: An = 6, AC = 7, K = 6. When calculating the formulas LCF-1 = 7.2923; LCF-2 = 9.5829; LCF-3 = 9.3772. The maximum number corresponds to the calculation of the formula for LCF-2, thus, the examined person is predicted to have average neuropsychiatric stability. Example 3. The following indicators were determined for the subject: An = 4, AC = 4, K = 3. When calculating the formulas LCF-1 = 1.2372; LCF-2 = -0.75; LCF-3 = 0.077. The maximum number corresponds to the calculation of the formula for LCF-1, thus, the examined person is predicted to have low neuropsychiatric stability. Conclusions. 1. Predictors of the neuropsychiatric stability of military personnel are a combination of indicators of cognitive development: the ability to establish logical relationships between concepts based on analysis and synthesis operations, the level of development of verbal and logical thinking; tempo characteristics of mental activity, the level of development of operational thinking and operational memory, as well as the characteristics of attention; the ability to transform visual images in space, the level of development of spatial-figurative thinking. 2. A model for predicting the level of neuropsychiatric stability was obtained: Wilkes Lambda: 0.95595 approx. F (6.3634)=13.799 p<0.0001, predictive ability of 68%, which allows it to be used in medical and psychological support activities for military university cadets. References
1. Agafonov, P.V., Khalimov, Yu.Sh., Gaiduk, S.V., & Kryukov, E.V. (2021). The influence of psychological characteristics of military personnel on adaptation to the conditions of the Far North. Marine Medicine, 3, 41-48.
2. Berg, T.N. (2005). Neuropsychic stability and ways to identify it. Vladivostok: Mor. state Univ. 3. Bily, A.M., & Vasilkov, A.M. (2018). Psychophysiological predictors of human-system integration on modern ships of the Russian Navy. Marine Medicine, 3, 64-74. 4. Grzhibovsky, A.M., Gorbatova, M.A., Narkevich, A.N., & Vinogradov, K.A. (2020). Necessary sample size to compare average values in two paired groups. Marine Medicine, 4, 82-88. 5. Zabrodsky, D.S., Zaitsev, A.G., & Soshkin, P.A. (2022). Fundamental principles of ensuring individual health: a review. Marine Medicine, 3, 7-21. 6. Kolyakin, V.V., Baurova, N.N., & Zun, S.A. (2015). Optimization of mass psychoprophylactic examinations of cadets of military universities. Marine Medicine, 4, 9-12. 7. Kochubeynik, N.V., Stepanov, V.A., Sklyarov, V.N., Linkenko, S.N., & Karakhanyan, K.S. (2022). The use of innovative barotherapeutic agents in the correction of borderline functional states of persons in hazardous professions. Marine Medicine, 1, 38-43. 8. Melnik, E.V., & Silich, E.V. (2009). Neuropsychic stability as a component of individualization of psychological training of athletes. Bulletin of the Grodno University Yanka Kupala. Series 3. Physiology, pedagogy, psychology, 3(88), 138-142. 9. Mitkina, E.A., Kozlova, Yu.G., Gorbatova, M.A., & Grzhibovsky, A.M. (2023). Analysis of the reliability of assessing dichotomous outcomes: sample size and calculation of kappa statistics. Marine Medicine, 3, 102-112. 10. Mosyagin, I.G. (2023). The role and place of marine medicine. Marine medicine, 3, 7-12. 11. Osipova, A.A., & Tyurbeeva, D.S. (2023). Psychological features of coping behavior of military personnel. Living Psychology, 1(41), 15-23. 12. Rakhmanov, R.S., Bogomolova, E.S., Razgulin, S.A., & Spirin, S.A. (2023). Assessment of the reaction of the body of seafarers during work at sea using integral health indicators: a cohort study. Marine Medicine, 3, 56-63. 13. Tyagnerev, A.T., Bezkishkiy, E.N., Lobozova, O.V., Stepanov, V.A., Linkenko, S.N., Afendikov, S.G., & Karakhanyan, K.S. (2019). The problem of monitoring the functional state and performance of naval personnel of the Navy in the process of professional activity. Marine Medicine, 4, 74-83. 14. Kholmatova, K.K., Kharkova, O.A., Gorbatova, M.A., & Grzhibovsky, A.M. (2022). Hybrid research in medicine and healthcare. Marine medicine, 3, 105-117. 15. Fertikova, T.E. (2019). The state of health of students and health-preserving technologies: regional experience of Russian universities. Marine Medicine, 2, 34-44. 16. Chermyanin, S.V., Korzunin, V.A., & Yusupov, V.V. (2008). Methodological aspects of diagnosing neuropsychic instability among specialists in extreme activities. Medical-biological and social-psychological problems of safety in emergency situations, 6, 49-54. 17. Chernyavsky, E.A., Zelenina, N.V., Yusupov, V.V., & Grigorov, A.V. (2022). The use of modern psychophysiological hardware and software systems in predicting resistance to combat stress. Proceedings of the Russian Military Medical Academy, 3, 277-282.
First Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
Second Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|