Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

M.N. Zhirkov – the first researcher of the Yakut khomus: questions of origin, execution, existence

Pavlova-Borisova Tat'yana Vladimirovna

PhD in Art History

Associate Professor, Department of Culturology, Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University

677000, Russia, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Yakutsk, Kulakovsky str., 42

pavlovaborisova@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2023.12.69486

EDN:

CJQIEI

Received:

24-12-2023


Published:

31-12-2023


Abstract: The article is devoted to a previously unexplored problem - M.N. Zhirkov's study of the Yakut khomus, the study of which he undertook for the first time in the history of Yakut musical culture. The author of this article summarizes for the first time the aspects posed by the researcher about the Yakut khomus. The subject of research is the scientific views of M.N. Zhirkov about the Yakut musical instrument - the khomus. The object of study is the scientific heritage of the first Yakut composer and an outstanding musical figure. The main results of our research are the following theses. At the beginning of the twentieth century, there was an increase in interest in traditional musical instruments and their performing practices. This statement is also relevant in relation to the Yakut khomus, which in modern conditions is experiencing its revival and active introduction into musical and cultural turnover. The article uses a retrospective and historical-comparative, as well as a comprehensive research method, in which the khomus is considered as an integral part of the traditional, and now wider, musical culture of the Yakuts, taking into account the data available today from archaeology, ethnography, and history. M.N. Zhirkov is presented as the first researcher of the Yakut khomus and as the composer and founder of the national school of composition. In the fundamental work "Yakut folk Music", published only after almost half a century after author's death (a new edition of this study dates back to 2022, made in an edition preserving the style and position of M.N. Zhirkov from the standpoint of the historical time when the famous scientific work was created), its author for the first time turned his gaze to the issues of the origin, existence, and functioning of the khomus in the traditional musical culture of the Yakuts. The materials presented by him have not previously been generalized in the scientific literature and are of great interest to modern researchers of the Yakut Khomus.


Keywords:

Yakut khomus, plate khomus, arc khomus, jew's harp, playing practice, syyia tardyy, national instruments, Mark Zhirkov, Yakut music, folklore

This article is automatically translated.

The first Yakut composer, the founder of the national school of composition, M.N. Zhirkov, throughout his life, carried out a lot of work on collecting materials and studying Yakut folk music, including folk instruments. The result of his scientific activity was the writing of the study "Yakut folk music", which for many years after the premature departure of the composer from life was kept in the storerooms unpublished. For a long time, M.N. Zhirkov's materials were little known to a wide range of fans of Yakut folk music, including folk instruments and, in particular, about khomus [5; 14]. Almost half a century later, the Yakut musicologist G.G. Alekseeva published the work of M.N. Zhirkov in 1981 [5].

The second edition was carried out four decades later in 2022 by the author of this article as part of the publication of the Collected Works of M.N. Zhirkov as volume IX - in an edition preserving the peculiarities of the researcher's scientific style [4].

In general, the Yakut khomus is known as a phenomenon in science and has been actively studied in recent years [1; 2; 3; 6; 7; 8; 17; 18; 19; 20; 22; 23], but, as the materials of our research show, the fundamental role in the development of problems about the Yakut khomus especially in the initial period of development of the Yakut musical science, belongs to M.N.Zhirkov [13; 14; 15; 16].

The purpose of this article is to consider the main scientific views of M.N.Zhirkov on the origin of the Yakut khomus, its existence, and the peculiarities of performance, as well as to study his contribution as the first researcher of this instrument in the field of historical regional musicology.

The article uses a retrospective, historical-comparative, organological method as well as a comprehensive research method, in which the khomus is considered as an integral part of the traditional, and now the entire musical culture of the Yakuts, taking into account the data available to date from archaeology, ethnography, and history.

In his fundamental work, M.N. Zhirkov outlined the fundamental views on the genre, style composition, history of the study of Yakut folk music, intonation and rhythmic features of folk tunes, as well as the existence and prospects for the development of national musical instruments.

   Among them, special attention was paid by the researcher to the Yakut harp - khomus.  He further notes that the German harp is better known as a maultrommel – it is characterized by motor sound production and in joint compositions it is more used as an instrument that sets the rhythmic basis, so it obviously has a name – "mouth drum". By chang, the Iranian angular harp, common among the peoples of the East, the Yakut composer, apparently, meant the eastern harp of chankovuz. In Uzbekistan, he is better known as kopuz. In modern science studying the harp, interest in it does not subside, researchers find new forms of this instrument among other peoples, conduct a comparative analysis [21].

In the light of modern theoretical studies of the harp as a widespread musical instrument [9; 10; 11; 24; 25; 26] the historical significance of the Yakut khomus looks in a new way. In the world classification of the harp, it occupies a special place as a kind of musical instrument in Northeast Asia at the junction of various ethnic cultures.

M.N. Zhirkov disagreed with Z.'s researchers. Ewald, V. Kosovanov, S. Avayantsev, according to whom "... due to the delay in the processes of decomposition of the tribal system (...) in the field of ideological superstructures," all the northern tribes of Siberia generally have "the most primitive stage of musical thinking, compared with other Siberian nationalities" and "extremely weak development of instrumental music - "...the instruments of the described nationalities are limited to the so-called "harp", common among all the peoples of the north..." [4, p.73], but at the same time M.N. Zhirkov supports the position of scientists of that period that the khomus is "the most common musical instrument among the Yakut people" from the very limited traditional musical instruments of this ethnic group.

M.N. Zhirkov in chapter 2 "On musical instruments of the Yakut people in the historical and ethnographic literature" of his study "Yakut folk music" examines the first mentions of khomus, which were known by that time in the sources of the pre-revolutionary period - the works of Russian travelers and researchers.

The Russian traveler of German origin A.F. Middendorf wrote the following: "These, full of life, observers of nature are ready to sing at any time, but the only musical instruments that I met with them were (...) violin and harp. Both are obviously borrowed from the Russians."[8],  

Researcher and naturalist R.K. Maak believed that: "Yakut dances are never accompanied by music and in general the Vilyui Yakuts do not know any music and do not know any musical instruments and do not have any musical instruments, except for the ill-sounding harp borrowed from Russians, on which idle Yakuts sometimes strum for whole days" [7].

Political messenger V.L. Seroshevsky noted that: "The Yakuts are very fond of listening to instrumental music, especially playing the violin. They themselves do not have any musical instruments except khamys, an instrument consisting of an iron frame with a spring in the middle, which is played with fingers, taking the frame in their lips and varying the tones with the help of teeth and tongue. This device is similar to the Little Russian "drum". I saw him in the valley of the Carpathian Mountains in the hands of shepherds. I wonder if he was brought there from Asia or, conversely, made his way to the far northeast along with the conquering Cossacks. The accompaniment to the song on khamys is impossible, and the singer inserts its silvery, gentle sounds only as an ornament, like the blows of a cymbal. However, I know one song that describes the spring flight of birds and where the singing of the latter in the intervals between verses is reproduced exclusively by playing the khamys" [17, pp.570-571].

   M.N. Zhirkov offers his own version of the interpretation of the etymology of this national term, given by V.Seroshevsky: "It can be assumed that the name of the Yakut musical instrument khomus came from the plant "reed", since reed in Yakut is khomus. Probably, many of us were fond of homemade khomuses made of kindling or reeds from under tea reed boxes in childhood. They sounded, however, muffled, but still made a musical sound" [4, p.76].

Thus, the composer hypothesizes that the title  The Yakut instrument khomus-khamys comes from the word "reed", common in the Turkic languages (Turk., kypch., Crimea.-tat., Azerbaijan., tat. kamys - i.e. "plant", "reed beds" (according to Radlov) [12].

M.N. Zhirkov gives an image of a homemade khomus made of a splinter or reed [4, p.71] - kulu h un khomus. It was made of a thin splinter (wood chips) or a reed plate with a protruding narrow edge – the so-called "applied" (M.N. Zhirkov's definition) reed tongue, which, when struck with the fingers of a hand, as a result of vibration, emitted a dull sound of a certain height.

Fig.1. A chomus made of wood

It should be noted that such a plate harp among the Yakuts, made of chips, splinters, wood, was called wooden - mas khomus - according to the material from which it could be made, but did not have a wide existence. There is also a mention of the existence among the Yakuts of a lamellar harp made of bone - the so-called bone - uoh khomus or horn, i.e. from the horn of an animal - muos khomus, but M.N. Zhirkov does not provide information about them. These plate harps according to the systematics of musical instruments by E.Hornbostel and K.Sachs They belong to idioglottic harps - plucked idiophones, index 121.21. In the Yakut culture, they were perceived rather as toys-crafts for brightening up leisure, including children's, since they were easy to manufacture and use.

Attention should be paid to the fact that M.N.Zhirkov, in the classification of musical instruments of the Yakut people proposed by him in this work, refers the khomus to wind reed instruments. This observation needs to be corrected - according to the widely known taxonomy of E.Hornbostel and K.Sachs apply index 121.221 to the Yakut metal chomus, a class of plucked heteroglottic (with a tongue attached to the instrument frame) arc idiophones.

Among the prototypes of the so-called "wind reed instruments" M.N. Zhirkov singled out "a leaf of grass clamped between lips or fingers..." p[4, p. 70].

When identifying the spectral textures of music performed on harps made of five different materials, researchers A.V. Nikolsky, E.E. Alekseev, I.E. Alekseev, V.E. Dyakonova came to the conclusion that "grass and metal arc harps form two poles of textured arrangement. Between them are bamboo, bone and wooden frame harps. The order of increasing sampling of batches (components of the spectral texture) coincides with the order of increasing complexity of manufacturing technology and limiting the availability of appropriate material for the general public" [11, p.13].

In their opinion, these materials are divided into the following groups:

"1. Herbal instruments are distinguished by a simple quiet clicking sound, low harmony, lack of a pedal and poor texture differentiation, which also characterizes the yash-komus, mas khomus and komus charts attributed by Yu.I. Sheikin to proto-drums [19].

2. Bamboo, wooden and bone instruments are distinguished by a loud, low and harsh tone of heterogeneous content, noticeable harmony, good or incomplete texture differentiation and the presence of two or three types of texture for each of the materials.

3. Metal instruments are distinguished by the longest-sounding, full and homogeneous tone with the highest harmony and excellent control over the tonal organization (TO) of each of the parties - from triad to microchromatic" [11, pp. 13-14].

 As Yu.I. Sheikin wrote, "the simplicity of manufacturing brings the sounding vein closer to the harp and especially the harp - idiophones in the form of elastic tongues made of chips, twigs and thin pointed bone. A sliver - mas khomus - made of birch or dried larch on the root is known among the Sakha people as a children's sound toy. According to the memoirs of the outstanding bearer of the Sakha folklore tradition in the XX century, S.A. Zverev - Kyl Uol, the mas khomus was almost the first instrument of the Sakha, because a child could make and master it. An ordinary sliver with a thin tip of the tutar bocciuog was used, which was brought to the slightly open mouth, and a slight pinch of the finger produced a sound vibration (Chakhov A.I. Sakha was a musical instrument. Yakutsk, 1993. pp.6-7). A.P. Reshetnikova rightly draws attention to one of the tales of Sakha, in which the hero, getting angry, "began to speak so loudly that the khomuses broke off from strong pillars," i.e. slivers-harps - "sounding slivers" [22, p.80].

 About the arc metal Yakut khomus in the named work, the author left the following description: "The most common musical instrument among the Yakut people, belonging by nature to the specified group of instruments, is the khomus. It consists of a horseshoe-shaped iron rim with elongated legs. A steel plate in the form of a dragonfly leg with a curved thin end is attached to this horseshoe at one end" [4, p.76].

 Fig.2. Yakut metal chomus

 As illustrations, M.N. Zhirkov cites images made by graphic artist E.M. Shaposhnikov and member of the Union of Writers of the USSR E.P. Shestakov (Erciman).

 One of them depicts a Yakut girl in a national costume playing a khomus. The instrument itself is practically not visible in her hands, but the reader defines her as a khomusist by the characteristic position of her hands – with her left hand she holds the khomus at her mouth, and with her right she methodically strikes his tongue.

According to the sitting position of the performer, the position of the body, the tilt of her head down, the collected position of the hands, in which the elbows are slightly pressed against the body, we can conclude about the traditional style of playing on the khomus, called syyy tardy – i.e., "moderate", "long-drawn" game with calm phases of inhalation and exhalation, with a long intense

297á.jpg

Fig.3. Yakutka playing on a khomus

 sound production, in contrast to the dynamic manner of playing practiced by modern Yakut performers on the khomus - with fast phases of inhalation and exhalation at a sufficiently high tempo, especially in the final parts of the compositions.  It can be sustained, as a rule, standing straight, when the shoulders are widely deployed, the elbows are raised and spread apart, which allows you to achieve a multiple, methodically repeated sharp wrist swing, providing greater sound dynamics.        

Indeed, during the years of M.N. Zhirkov's writing of the study "Yakut folk Music", the traditional manner of performing on a khomus was practiced - syya tardy (from syya - i.e. "gradually" and tardy - i.e. "twitching, twitching")  It was the women who filled their leisure time in this way: "They play on it, biting it with their teeth and adjusting the sounds with their lips and tongue. This instrument was widespread among the Yakuts, but it was mainly played by women," the composer wrote quite rightly [4, p.76].

Currently, a large number of young male homusists have come forward, striving for virtuoso mastery of this instrument for public performances in the framework of both amateur, amateur and professional concert performance.

The composer further mentions in his work: "... researchers have not yet established the names of the most prominent virtuoso performers on this instrument, who were and are among the people," which allows us to conclude that the existence of this Yakut instrument during the period described by the author of the study was characteristic of traditional culture, including with a certain characteristic the anonymity of musical creativity.     

In contrast, starting from the 30s of the twentieth century, the names of Yakut homusists began to be more actively introduced into the musical and cultural context of the Soviet era - among them it is necessary first of all to mention Luka Tournina, Prokopy Sleptsova, and later Ivan Alekseev-Khomus Uybaan, etc. Currently, many well-known modern homusist performers are almost all amateur or professional artists who lead an active performing practice, including on the concert stage.

M.N. Zhirkov also notes that the khomus as an artifact was not found by archaeologists during excavations on the territory of Yakutia, in particular, it relies on data obtained by academician A.P. Okladnikov, who mentions only the discovery of an object similar to a bone flute by him [4, C.77], unlike, for example, the harps of the ancient Slavic culture of the Ekimauka settlement, dating from the IX-X centuries, as well as Russian harps found during excavations in Veliky Novgorod, which belong to the period of the XI-XV centuries. 

Based on this circumstance, the researcher agrees with the opinion of R.K. Maak and A.F. Middendorf that the khomus was borrowed by the Yakuts from the Russians: "It is unclear exactly where this instrument was borrowed by the Yakuts. It is only known that the Golds and Orochons borrowed it from the Yakuts. The harp or khomus was widespread among many peoples throughout Russia, as well as in Austria-Hungary, among the Balkan peoples, Turkic, Finnish, Mongolian tribes and many others. Among Russians it was called dyrdla, among Ukrainians – drymba, among Serbo-Croats – drambule, among Cheremis and Chuvash – kabash or kabas, among Germans – zimngelkugel, among Kirghiz – Timir komuz, among Uzbeks – chang. During archaeological excavations in Yakutia, the khomus was not found anywhere. This gives reason to agree with the opinions of R. Maak and A.F. Middendorf on the borrowing of khomus Yakuts among Russians" [4, p.76].

Nevertheless, according to A.V. Nikolsky, E.E. Alekseev, I.E. Alekseev, V.E. Dyakonova, "the time of the genesis of the first organic harps can be established by dating the migration of the Siberian indigenous population to America... but there are absolutely no facts of the use of the harp by the indigenous population of America in the pre-Columbian era," and then they continue: "Altai and Sayan are the homeland of the harp. The Yakuts, for whom the khomus represents the national emblem, originate, judging by linguistic data, from the same region" [11, p.21].

Thus, additional sources and materials are needed to solve this problem - the issue requires further research involving more data, including from archaeological sources, to clarify the hypothesis expressed by M.N. Zhirkov in support of the conclusions of R. Maak and A.F. Middendorf.

In accordance with the above facts, it is necessary to draw the following conclusions about the explication of M.N.Zhirkov's scientific views on khomus:

1. The founder of the Yakut school of composition, M.N. Zhirkov, was one of the first to investigate the issues of origin, history, existence, and performance in the Yakut language in the period up to the first half of the XX century.

2. M.N. Zhirkov's materials are of great scientific interest and are very relevant in modern conditions, when interest in the Yakut khomus and the practice of playing it has grown significantly.

3. M.N. Zhirkov in his research provided information about two types of khomuses:

 - wooden (reed) lamellar khomus/ khamys - which was much less common among the Yakuts;

- metal arc clamp is widely and universally used.

4. M.N. Zhirkov supported the hypothesis expressed by the first Russian travelers, researchers of the life and way of life of the Yakut people R. Maak and A.F. Middendorf, expressed by them in relation to the Yakuts borrowing a harp from Russian explorers.

5. This hypothesis currently does not find wide support among modern researchers of the Yakut Khomus and additional sources and materials, including those of archaeological origin, are needed to solve this problem in order to shed light on this issue to one extent or another.

6. The observations made by M.N. Zhirkov, the images of the Yakut khomus known to him at that time indicate that this national practice was actively present in the musical culture of the Yakuts.

7. Having studied the khomus as a phenomenon of the national musical culture of the Yakuts, composer M.N. Zhirkov subsequently began to take active measures to modernize it in order to introduce it into the professional musical culture of this ethnic group.

8. The information collected and introduced by M.N. Zhirkov into musical and cultural circulation has had a great impact on modern generations of Yakut khomus makers, khomus performers who are currently guided by the data provided by him.

References
1. Akimova, A.S. (2021). O terminologii yakutskogo khomusa. [On the terminology of the Yakut khomus]. Modern scientist, 4, 184-187.
2. Alekseev, E.P. (2020). Yakutskiy stil' ispolnitel'stva na khomuse v istoricheskom kontekste. [Yakut style of performing the khomus in the context of historical development]. Bulletin of the North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov. Series “Economics. Sociology. Culturology", 2, 36-43.
3. Alekeev E.E. (Ed.). (1991). Vargan and his music (Materials of the 1st All-Union Conference, 1988). Yakutsk: Polygraphist.
4. Zhirkov, M.N. (2022). Collected works. In 10 volumes. Vol. 9. Yakut folk music. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
5. Zhirkov, M.N. (1981). Yakut folk music. Yakutsk: Book. publishing house.
6. Alekseev, I.E. (Ed.). (2021). Catalog of museum objects from the collections of the Museum and the Khomus Center of the Peoples of the World. Yakut khomus. Yakutsk: Book publishing.
7. Maak, R.K. (1887). Vilyuisky district of the Yakut region. St. Petersburg: Type. and chromolithogram. A. Transhelya.
8. Middendorf, A.F. (1878). Travel to the North and East of Siberia. North and East of Siberia in natural. Indigenous people of Siberia: (end of the entire essay). St. Petersburg: Type. AN.
9. Nikolsky, A.V., Alekseev, E.E., Alekseev, I.E., & Dyakonova, V.E. (2020). Kak, gde i kogda skladyvalis’ autentichnye vargannye traditsii Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka. Chsst’ 1: Opredeleniya muzyki, tembrovoi muzyki I vargannoi artikul’yatsionnoi systemy [How, where and when the authentic jew's harp traditions of Siberia and the Far East developed. Part 1: Definitions of music, timbre music and jew's harp articulation system]. Languages and folklore of the indigenous peoples of Siberia, 1, 9-32.
10. Nikolsky A.V., Alekseev E.E., Alekseev I.E., & Dyakonova V.E. Kak, gde i kogda skladyvalis’ autentichnye vargannye traditsii Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka. Chast’ 2: Strukturnye, psikho-akusticheskie I istoriko-geograficheskie osobennosti formirovaniya volalinoi systemy traditsionnoi vargannoi muzyki. [How, where and when the authentic jew's harp traditions of Siberia and the Far East developed. Part 2: Structural, psycho-acoustic and historical-geographical features of the formation of the vocal system of traditional jew's harp music]. Languages and folklore of the indigenous peoples of Siberia, 2, 9-24.
11. Nikolsky A.V., Alekseev E.E., Alekseev I.E., & Dyakonova V.E. (2021). Kak, gde i kogda skladyvalis’ autentichnye vargannye traditsii Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka. Chast’ 3: Vliyanie materialov, ikh dostupnosti i istorii razvitiya tekhnologiy ikh izgotovleniya na akusticheskie svoistva vargana i tonovuyu organizatsiyu ego muzyki. [How, where and when the authentic jew's harp traditions of Siberia and the Far East developed. Part 3: The influence of materials, their availability and the history of the development of technologies for their production on the acoustic properties of the harp and the tonal organization of its music]. Languages and folklore of the indigenous peoples of Siberia, 1, 9-31.
12. Radlova, V.V. (1893). Experience of the dictionary of Turkic dialects . In 4 volumes. Vol. 1. Part 2. St. Petersburg: Printing house of the Imperial Academy of Sciences.
13. Pavlova-Borisova, T.V., & Cherdantseva, A.L. (2021). Zvuchanie khomusa kak marker kul'turnoi identichosti sakha. [The sound of khomus as a marker of Sakha cultural identity]. Languages and culture of khomus of the peoples of Eurasia: speech and musical communications. Yakutsk: North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosova, 248-251.
14. Pavlova-Borisova, T.V. (2022). O trude M.N. Zhirkova "Yakutskata narodnaya muzyka. [About the study “Yakut folk music” M.N. Zhirkova]. Zhirkov M.N. Collected essays. In 10 volumes. Vol. 9. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
15. Pavlova-Borisova, T.V. (2022). O popul'yarizatsii i razvitii khomusa. [On the popularization and development of the Yakut khomus: to the 90th anniversary of N.S. Berestov]. Ethnopedagogy as a factor in preserving Russian identity. Kirov: Interregional Center for Innovative Technologies in Education, 59-62.
16. Pavlova-Borisova, T.V. (2021). Pervyi yakutkiy kompozitor Mak Zhirkov: traditsionnye i akademicheskie formy vorchestva. [The first Yakut composer Mark Zhirkov: traditional and academic forms of creativity]. Musical culture of Siberia: traditional and academic forms of creativity. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Conservatory named after. M.I. Glinka, 117-124.
17. Seroshevsky, V.L. (1896). Yakuts: ethnographic experiencer of esearch. St. Petersburg: Publishing house. IRGO with funds donated by A.I. Gromova.
18. Alekseev, I.E. (Ed.). (2019). Khomus (vargan): istoricheskie, kul'turnye i muzykal'no-terapevticheskie traditsii. [Khomus (harp): historical and cultural traditions and musical therapeutic practices]. Collection of articles and materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference (with international participation). Yakutsk: Book publishing.
19. Hornbostel, E.M., von Sachs, K. (1987). Sistematika muzykal'nykh instrumentov. [Systematics of musical instruments]. Folk musical instruments and instrumental music. Moscow: Soviet Composer.
20. Khudyakov, I.A. (1969). Brief description of the Verkhoyansk district. Leningrad: Nauka.
21. Tsyrenov, Ch.Ts., Tsyrenova, N.D. (2021). Daurskiy vargan: maloizvestnyi natsionalnyi instrument.[Daurian harp: a little-known national instrument]. Genesis: historical studies, 12, 346-352.
22. Sheykin, Yu.I. (2002). History of the musical culture of the peoples of Siberia: a comparative historical study. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.
23. Electronic resource (2021). Languages and culture of khomus (trump) of the peoples of Eurasia: speech and musical communications.” Yakutsk. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?selid=46319195&id=46319106.
24. Bakx, P., Crane, F. (2017). The 1000 Names of the Jew’s Harp. Middelburg. The Netherlands: Foundation Antropodium. Retrieved from http://www.antropodium.nl/Duizend Namen Mhp NOMENCLATUUR.htm (accessed December 21, 2023).
25. Tadagawa, L. (2017). Asian Excavated Jew’s Harps: A Checklist (2) – Lamellate Jew’s Harps (2). Institute of Ethnomusicology Bulletin of Tokyo College of Music, 6, 57-68.
26. Turbat, T. (2017). Archaeological Jew’s Harps from Ancient Nomadic Cultures of Eastern Eurasia [Åâðàçèéí çүүí õýñãèéí ýðòíèé íүүäýë÷äèéí àðõåîëîãèéí äóðñãàëààñ èëýðñýí õýë õóóðóóä]. In: Turbat T., ed. Archaeological Survey. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, Academic Council of the Institute of History and Archeology of the Ministry of Nature. Environment and Tourism, 36, 169-180.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for publication in the journal Genesis: Historical Studies under the heading "M.N. Zhirkov – the first researcher of the Yakut khomus: questions of origin, performance, existence", as follows from the author's goal—setting, is a set of basic provisions of the famous Soviet musicologist and composer Mark Nikolaevich Zhirkov (1892 - 1951), stemming from the results of his research on the Yakut national musical instrument "khomus". The author writes: "The purpose of this article is to consider the main provisions of composer M.N. Zhirkov's research on the Yakut national instrument – the khomus." Although, as the reviewer notes, a different purpose is indicated in the title of the article in the form of an assertion: proof of the superiority of M.N. Zhirkov in the study of the Yakut khomus. If we take into account that Mark Nikolaevich himself refers to certain ethnographic and archaeological sources in his well-known and republished work, then his primacy consists in explicating the ethnological problem of the origins of the appearance of the musical instrument "khomus" in the musical culture of Sakha in the field of historical regional musicology. The author's lack of explanation of the meaning of the title he chose for the article does not relate to significant theoretical errors, but nevertheless, in the opinion of the reviewer, it would be logical for the author to summarize the result of his generalizations in the form of an argumentation of the thesis presented in the title of the article in the final conclusion. In the light of the additional generalizations undertaken by the author of research by colleagues of ethnic varieties of the harp, the author's remark is certainly valuable that the hypothesis of historical borrowing of the harp from the Russian pioneers "currently does not find wide support among modern researchers of the Yakut khomus and additional sources and materials, including archaeological origin, are needed to solve this problem in one way or another to shed some light on this issue." In this sense, the article is problematic and goes beyond generalizing the accumulated experience of theoretical discussions about the musical culture of the peoples of Yakutia. In general, it can be summarized that the subject of the study was disclosed by the author at a level worthy of publication in a scientific journal. The methodology of the research is based on the generalization and explication in the context of current theoretical discussions of the totality of the main provisions of the authoritative Soviet musicologist and composer M. N. Zhirkov on the study of the Yakut khomus. The opinion of an authoritative scientist and the results of his research are in this case a weighty argument for ongoing discussions. Therefore, most likely, the author emphasized in the title the primacy of M. N. Zhirkov in a musicological appeal to the cultural origins of the Yakut khomus. According to the reviewer, it would be appropriate for the author to further emphasize his own opinion on the identified problematic issue in the final conclusion. The author explains the relevance of the chosen topic to the reader as part of the need to popularize the legacy of the founder of the Yakut musical regionalism. However, as the reviewer notes, it is equally important to actualize the lack of grounds for unambiguously determining the historical origins of the appearance of the harp in the musical culture of the peoples of Yakutia. The scientific novelty of the article, which consists in the author's search for sufficient empirical grounds for the statements made by M. N. Zhirkov on the origin and existence of the Yakut khomus, seems trustworthy. The style of the text is generally scientific, although some typos in words (for example, in the expression "as an integral part of the traditional"), as well as in the use of punctuation marks (in some cases there are unnecessary spaces before punctuation marks, in others there is a random dot), require additional literary proofreading and proofreading of the text. The structure of the article corresponds to the logic of presenting the results of scientific research, although the content of the final conclusion, in the opinion of the reviewer, could be strengthened by emphasizing the author's position on the most pressing problematic issue. The bibliography as a whole reveals the problematic area of research, although it is not designed to integrate the results obtained into a wide field of international studies of regional musical culture (there is no review of foreign specialized literature over the past 3-5 years). The appeal to the opponents is quite correct, sufficient and appropriate. The article is certainly of interest to the readership of the journal "Genesis: Historical Research" and after a little revision by the author can be published.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "M.N. Zhirkov – the first researcher of the Yakut khomus: questions of origin, performance, existence" to the journal "Genesis: historical research", in which a study of the scientific activities of the Yakut composer, founder of the national school of composition M.N. Zhirkov on the collection of materials and the study of Yakut folk music, including, folk instruments. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that M.N. Zhirkov throughout his life carried out a lot of work on collecting materials and studying Yakut folk music, including folk instruments. The result of his scientific activity was the writing of the study "Yakut folk Music", which for many years after the premature death of the composer was kept unpublished in the storerooms. For a long time, M.N. Zhirkov's materials were little known to a wide range of fans of Yakut folk music, including folk instruments and, in particular, about the khomus. In 1981, Yakut musicologist G.G. Alekseeva published the work of M.N. Zhirkov. The second edition was carried out in 2022 by the author of this article as part of the publication of the Collected Works of M.N. Zhirkov as the IX volume. In his fundamental work, M.N. Zhirkov outlined the fundamental views on the genre, style composition, history of the study of Yakut folk music, intonation and rhythmic features of folk tunes, as well as the existence and prospects for the development of national musical instruments. The observations made by M.N. Zhirkov and the images of the Yakut khomus, known at that time, indicate that this national practice was actively present in the musical culture of the Yakuts. The relevance of the research is due to the interest of both the scientific community and the general public in the socio-cultural realities of indigenous peoples. The methodological basis is an integrated approach, including a retrospective, historical-comparative, organological method, as well as an analysis of the scientific text. The theoretical basis is the works of such researchers as M.N. Zhirkov, et al. The empirical base consists of descriptions of the Yakut khomus, as well as ethnographic records and memoirs of contemporaries. The purpose of this article is to consider the main scientific views of M.N. Zhirkov on the origin of the Yakut khomus, its existence, and the peculiarities of performance, as well as to study his contribution as the first researcher of this instrument in the field of historical regional musicology. Based on the analysis of the scientific validity of the studied issues, the author concludes that the Yakut khomus as a phenomenon in science is known and has been actively studied in recent years, but, as the materials of the research conducted by the author show, the fundamental role in the development of the problems of the Yakut khomus, especially in the initial period of development of Yakut musical science, belongs to M.N. Zhirkov. To achieve this goal, the author has done a detailed analysis of the work of M.N. Zhirkov, dedicated to the Yakut version of the folk instrument of the harp – khomus. The author cites the researcher's hypothesis regarding the etymology of the instrument's name, Zhirkov's polemic with other scientists. M.N. Zhirkov supported the hypothesis expressed by the first Russian travelers, researchers of the life and way of life of the Yakut people R. Maak and A.F. Middendorf, expressed by them regarding the Yakuts borrowing the harp from Russian explorers. As the author notes, this hypothesis currently does not find wide support among modern researchers of the Yakut khomus, therefore, the solution to this problem requires additional research of sources and materials, including archaeological origin. M.N. Zhirkov in his research provided information about two types of khomus: wooden (reed) lamellar khomus/khamys, It was much less common among the Yakuts; a metal arc clamp, widespread and ubiquitous. Having studied the khomus as a phenomenon of the national musical culture of the Yakuts, composer M.N. Zhirkov subsequently began to take active measures to modernize it in order to introduce it into the professional musical culture of this ethnic group. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. The author notes that the information collected and introduced by M.N. Zhirkov into musical and cultural circulation has had a great impact on modern generations of Yakut khomus makers, khomus performers, who are currently guided by the data provided by him. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the socio-cultural realities of certain indigenous peoples is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the research consists of 26 sources, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse. The author fulfilled his goal, obtained certain scientific results that made it possible to summarize the material, showed deep knowledge of the studied issues. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication. However, the text of the article needs correction.