Library
|
Your profile |
Theoretical and Applied Economics
Reference:
Bekryashev A.
Adam Smith on uncertainty and security. Part 1.
// Theoretical and Applied Economics.
2023. № 4.
P. 73-86.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8647.2023.4.69369 EDN: OMFUAT URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=69369
Adam Smith on uncertainty and security. Part 1.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8647.2023.4.69369EDN: OMFUATReceived: 18-12-2023Published: 31-12-2023Abstract: The subject of the article is the study of Adam Smith's conceptual ideas about uncertainty and security and their relationship. Methods of conceptual analysis are used in two versions. The presentist approach aims to interpret Smith's ideas about uncertainty in terms of modern concepts (fundamental and epistemological uncertainty and their forms). The antiquarian approach aims to explain the features of Smith's concepts in the context of the theological, philosophical ideas and methodological ideas he shared. The analysis is used in presentist and antiquarian variants. The first part of the article shows that Smith uses several concepts of uncertainty. One of them corresponds to the modern idea of epistemic uncertainty. Smith also develops an original concept of ambiguity, which, in the author's opinion, can be most constructively understood from the standpoint of a generalized version of Niels Bohr's principle of complementarity. However, in Smith's system this type of uncertainty is of fundamental importance and is associated with the feeling of sympathy. The third part of the article examines the influence of theological ideas on Smith's ideas about uncertainty. The peculiarities of scientists' interpretation of the uncertainty of the future are explored. The second part also examines selected conceptual relationships between uncertainty and security. In Smith's theoretical system, the reduction of uncertainty plays a special role in ensuring the long-term survival of society (ensuring security - in the presentist interpretation). Smith associates it with following the rules of the virtue of justice, which have the greatest certainty and, functioning like the rules of grammar, perform the function of creating order. Keywords: fundamental uncertainty, epistemological uncertainty, security, complementarity principle, classical economic theory, ambiguity, sympathy, system knowledge, contextual knowledge, ergodicThis article is automatically translated. His proposed approach creates the basis for generalizing the idea of complementarity beyond the particular problem of the appropriateness of applying the norms of abstract virtue and, thus, reflects an understanding of the depth and complexity of Smith's theoretical thinking. It is also important to note that in Smith's theoretical system, reducing this uncertainty plays a special role in ensuring the survival of society. Smith directly links the long-term survival of society with the pursuit of the virtue of justice. [2, pp. 101-103] The rules of this virtue are the most definite and are compared by Smith with the rules of grammar [2, pp. 176-177] in their function of forming order. The understanding of Smith's conceptual ideas about uncertainty can hardly be complete without taking into account the religious context of the great scientist's scientific activity. Its influence is supposed to be considered in the second part of the article. References
1. Smith, А. (1962). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Izdatelstvo socialno-ekonomicheskoj literatury.
2. Smith, А. (1962). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Мoscow: Respublika. 3. Smith, A. (1982). Essays on philosophical subjects. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. 4. Viner, J. (1991). Essays on the Intellectual History of Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 5. Winch, D. (1996). Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750-1834. New York: Cambridge University Press. 6. Winch, D. (1978). Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7. Haakonssen, K. (1981). The Science of the Legislator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 8. Fleischacker, S. (2004). On Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations”: A Philosophical Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 9. Rothschild, E. (1996). The Debate on Economic and Social Security in the Late Eighteenth Century: Lessons of a Road Not Taken. Development and Change, 2(2), 331–351. 10. Persky, J. (1989). Adam Smith’s Invisible Hands. Econ. Perspectives, 3, 195–201. 11. Grampp, W.D. (2000). What Did Smith Mean by the Invisible Hand? Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 441–465. doi:10.1086/262125 12. Ослингтон, П. (2015). Бог и рынок: "невидимая рука" Адама Смита. Христианское чтение, 1, 181–206. 13. Harrison, P. (2011). Adam Smith and the History of the Invisible Hand. Journal of the History of Ideas, 72(1), 29–49. doi:10.1353/jhi.2011.a413473 14. Clark, Ch. (1992). Economic Theory and Natural Philosophy. The Search for the Natural Laws of the Economy. Jamaica, New York: Edward Elgar. 15. Newton, I. (2004). Isaac Newton: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809293 16. Knight, F. (2003). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Delo. 17. Keynes, J. М. (1993). Selected works. Ekonomika. 18. Keynes, J. М. General theory of employment. In Istoki. Issue 3. Izdatelskij dom Gos. Un-ta – Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2001. 19. Dequech, D. (2000). Fundamental Uncertainty and Ambiguity. Eastern Economic Journal, 26(1), 41–60. 20. Davidson, P. (1996). Reality and Economic Theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18(4), 491–492. doi:10.2307/4538504 21. North, D. (2010). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Izdatelskij dom Gos. Universiteta – Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 22. Blaug, М. (1994). Economic theory in retrospect. Delo Ltd. 23. Best, J. (2005). The limits of transparency. Ithaca and London. Cornell University Press. 24. Rozov, М.А. (2008). The theory of social relay races and problems of epistemology. Novyj hronograf. 25. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. London: Routledge. 26. Dow, S.C.&Chick, V. (2012). The Meaning of Open Systems. In Foundations for New Economic Thinking (178–196). London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137000729_11 27. Bohr, N. (1971). Selected scientific works, 2. Nauka. 28. Rozov, М.А. (1994). Presentism and antiquarianism – two pictures of history. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki, 3, 13–26. 29. Blaug, М. (2004). The Methodology of Economics, or How Economists Explain. NP «ZHurnal Voprosy ekonomiki». 30. Schabas, M. (2005). The Natural Origins of Economics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 31. Samuelson, P. (1968). What Classical and Neoclassical Monetary Theory Really Was. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1(1), 1–15. doi:10.2307/133458 32. Spengler, J. (1975). Adam Smith and Society’s Decision-makers. In Andrew S. Skinner, Thomas Wilson (Eds), Essays on Adam Smith (237–246). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 33. Bloom, N. (2014). Fluctuations in Uncertainty. Journal of economic perspectives, 28(2), 153-176. doi:10.1257/jep.28.2.153 34. Smith, A. (1977). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. 35. Davidson, P. (1991). Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 129–143.doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.129 36. Rozmainskij (2007). Monetary economics as the main “objective world” of post-Keynesian theory. Ekonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 5(3), 58–68. 37. Rozov, М.А. (2009). Engineering design in scientific knowledge. In V.A. Lektorskij (Ed.), Constructivist approach in epistemology and human science (54–67). Kanon-plyus. 38. Pauli, В. (1947). General principles of wave mechanics. М. – L.: ОGIZ. 39. Gendlin, E.T. (1991). Thinking beyond patterns: body, language and situations. In B. den Ouden & M. Moen (Eds.), The presence of feeling in thought (25-151). New York: Peter Lang.
Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|