Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Fetisova E.E.
The works of I. Lisnyanskaya in the concext of neo-Acmeism
// Philosophy and Culture.
2017. ¹ 1.
P. 86-97.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=68580
Fetisova E.E. The works of I. Lisnyanskaya in the concext of neo-AcmeismAbstract: This article, based on separate examples, illustrates the distinctive features of I. Lisnyanskaya lyrical perception of the world – a neo-Acmeist “sixtier” – in intertextual communication with the traditional (classical) Acmeism, poetry of A. Akhmatova and M. Tsvetaeva, as well as the culture of European Renaissance. The author determines the foundation, concept, and “semantic poetics” of neo-Acmeism alongside its specific mythology, which in turn, structures a poetic model of the world. The article analyzes the spatial and time continuum, its coordinates, artistic space and time as a peculiar aesthetics and verbal phenomenon. The notion of synchronic-reminiscent chronotope, shifted relatively to the boundaries of the actual space and time, is being introduced; and thanks to this, the “monologue on polyphonic basis” is being formed within mythology. In the center of comparative approach lies the resemblance of expressive means and author’s stylistics – from literary approaches, general phrases, quotes, allusions to the integrity of the author’s concept of lyrical plot, artistic space, and synchronic-reminiscent chronotope, which in a similar way is presented in the poems of I. Lisnyanskaya, “Divine Comedy” of Dante, lyrical cycles of A. Akhmatova, and poetry of A. Tarkovsky. The comparative analysis along with the method of semiotic reconstruction of a poetic text serve as the key towards understanding of the semantics and inner structures of neo-Acmeism paradigm. The author comes to a conceptual conclusion that neo-Acmeism continued the mission of symbolism; it transforms the concept of the world as an “aesthetic phenomenon” (Schopenhauer) into the principle of mystical energetism, cognizing the world through the “mystical elucidation”. The scientific novelty consists in the fact that the works of I. Lisnyanskaya are subjected to comprehensive interpretation, as well as viewed in light of the action of mechanism of the cultural memory – as the synthesis of form and content. Keywords: Archetype, Prototype, Literary context, Reminiscence, Lyrical character, Synchronic-reminiscent chronotope, Divine Comedy, Neo-Acmeism, Literary studies, Philology
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Lisnyanskaya I. L. Shkatulka: v kotoroy stikhi i proza. M.: Russkiy mir': Moskovskiy uchebnik, 2006. 480 s.
2. Bryusov V. Vchera, segodnya i zavtra sovremennoy russkoy poezii // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost, vstup. st., preambuly i primech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp; AST, 2002. S. 225–237. 3. Levin Yu. I., Segal D. M., Timenchik R. D., Toporov V. N., Tsiv'yan T. V. Russkaya semanticheskaya kul'turnaya paradigma // Russian Literature (Hague). 1974. ¹ 7-8. P. 49-89. 4. Nayman A. Rasskazy o Anne Akhmatovoy: Iz knigi «Konets pervoy poloviny KhKh veka». M., 1989. 237 s. 5. Kikhney L. G. Poeziya Anny Akhmatovoy: Tayny remesla. M., 1997. 148 s. 6. Leyderman N.L., M.N. Lipovetskiy. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: V 2 t. T. 2. – 2-izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Akademiya, 2006. 688 s. 7. Levin Yu. I., Segal D. M., Timenchik R. D., Toporov V. N., Tsiv'yan T. V. Russkaya semanticheskaya kul'turnaya paradigma // Russian Literature (Hague). 1974. ¹ 7-8. P. 49-89. 8. Evropeyskaya kul'tura: KhKhI vek / Pod red. E. V. Vodop'yanovoy. M.; SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2013. 480 s. 9. Serova M. V. Anna Akhmatova: Kniga Sud'by (fenomen «akhmatovskogo teksta»: problema tselostnosti i logika vnutristrukturnykh vzaimodeystviy). Ekaterinburg, 2005. 332 s. 10. Solov'ev V.S. Sochineniya: V 2 t. M., 1989. T. 2. 588 s. 11. Akhmatova A. Sobr. soch.: V 6 t. T. 2. Stikhotvoreniya. 1941-1959. M.: Ellis Lak, 2000. 528 s. 12. Lotman Yu. M. Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda // Tr. po znakovym sistemam. XVIII. Tartu, 1984. 768 s. 13. Dante Alig'eri. Bozhestvennaya komediya / Per. s ital. M. Lozinskogo; Vstup. st. K. Derzhavina. M.: Pravda, 1982. 670 s. 14. Lozinskiy M. Primechaniya // Dante Alig'eri. Bozhestvennaya komediya. Per. s ital. M. Lozinskogo; Vstup. st. K. Derzhavina. M.: Pravda, 1982. 670 s. 15. Pakhareva T. A. Syuzhet «moleniya o chashe» v poeticheskoy ideologii i mifologii A. Akhmatovoy // Russkiy yazyk, literatura, kul'tura v shkole i VUZe: Yubileynye chteniya k 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A. A. Akhmatovoy. ¹ 5 (29). Kiev, 2009. S. 2-6. 16. Chukovskaya L. K. Zapiski ob Anne Akhmatovoy: V 3 t. T. 2. M., 1997. 432 s. 17. Mandel'shtam O. E. Utro akmeizma // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstup. st., preambuly i primech. O. A. Lekmanova. M.: AST, 2002.-S. 189-194. 18. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. M., 1988. 740 s. 19. Lisnyanskaya I. Roskosh' prostoty // Lisnyanskaya I. L. Shkatulka: v kotoroy stikhi i proza. M.: Russkiy mir': Moskovskiy ucheb., 2006. 480 s. 20. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. «Inna Lisnyanskaya s rannego vozrasta byla proniknuta chuvstvom sostradaniya…» // Lisnyanskaya I. L. Shkatulka: v kotoroy stikhi i proza. M.: Russkiy mir': Moskovskiy uchebnik, 2006. 480 s. 21. Russkie pisateli KhKh veka: Biograficheskiy slovar' / Sost. P. A. Nikolyukin. M.: BRE, 2000. 1124 s. |